Catalog Search
 
Advanced Search

My shopping cart cart icon
Your cart is empty

My wish list wishlist icon
Your wish list is empty



Last update:
9 February 2010

© John Benjamins
Home

The Quality of Literature

Linguistic studies in literary evaluation

Edited by Willie van Peer
Ludwig Maximilian University

2008. ix, 243 pp.
Publishing status: Available

HardboundIn stock
978 90 272 3336 3 / EUR 99.00 / USD 149.00
Add to shopping cart

e-BookAvailable from e-book platforms
978 90 272 9151 6 / EUR 99.00 / USD 149.00
Ordering information

Add to wish list

Evaluation is central to literary studies and has led to an impressive list of publications on the status and history of the canon. Yet it is remarkable how little attention has been given to the role of textual properties in evaluative processes. Most of the chapters in The Quality of Literature redress this issue by dealing with texts or genres ranging from classical antiquity, via Renaissance to twentieth century. They provide a rich textual and historical panorama of how critical debate over literary quality has influenced our modes of thinking and feeling about literature, and how they continue to shape the current literary landscape. Four theoretical chapters reflect on the general state of literary evaluation while the introduction weaves the different threads together aiming at further conceptual clarification. This book thus contributes to a deeper understanding of the problems that are at the heart of past and present debates over literary quality.


Table of contents

Acknowledgments
vii
Foreword
ix
Introduction
Willie van Peer
1–14
Part I. Textual and generic comparisons
15
1. Canon formation: Ideology or aesthetic quality?
Willie van Peer
17–29
2. Why Hugh Maccoll is not, and will never be, part of any literary canon
Stein Haugom Olson
31–51
3. Popular / canonical: The case of The Secret Agent
Jan Gorak
53–69
4. Literary evaluation and poetic form: Poetic form and creative tension
Tom Barney
71–81
5. Poetic value: Political value
Laurence Lerner
83–94
6. "Too soon transplanted": Coleridge and the forms of dislocation
David S. Miall
95–116
7. Evaluation and stylistic analysis
Mick Short and Elena Semino
117–137
8. The value of Juvenal
Walter Nash
139–156
Part II. Theoretical reflections
157
9. Some correlates of literary eminence
Colin Martindale
159–167
10. Macbeth through the computer: Literary evaluation and pedagogical implications
Sonia Zyngier
169–190
11. How scientific can literary evaluation be? Arguments and experiments
Harald Fricke
191–207
12. Philosophical perspectives on literary value
Paisley Livingston
209–221
13. The qualities of literatures: A concept of literary evaluation in pluralistic societies
Renate von Heydebrand and Simone Winko
223–239
Author index
241–242
Subject index
243


This is an excellent volume, of an academic and intellectual standard that should be attractive to any university press in the English-speaking world… The book is likely to be highly controversial precisely because it goes against the grain of Anglophone literary study of the past quarter-century. This controversy is precisely what is needed in the field ­ and has been needed for many years.
Prof. Donald Freeman

This is a book that could potentially become on the cutting edge of literary study. I have been impressed, over the years, with Prof. Lindauer's attempts to integrate the study of imaginative literature and contemporary psychology. This book looks like a solid contribution to the developing paradigm of literary study and empirical psychology.
John V. Knapp (editor of Style), Northern Illinois University

While there is growing interest in the psychology of beauty and aesthetics applied to visual art forms, literature is often given the short end of the stick. Psych and the Literary Muses is an example of beautiful writing in itself, with research results sprinkled about. How can the written word stir our souls, awaken our senses, and stimulate our thoughts? What properties of the text can have such an affect on the reader? By looking at the Psychology of literature from the vantage point of the text, Lindauer offers fresh and deep insight into the experience of reading, balancing work being done by psychology of creative writing researchers on the psychological quirks of the writer. Lindauer’s broad knowledge base of literature shines through in his writing and only adds to the respectability of his ideas. By connecting the text to such diverse topics as person perception, creativity, learning, and even aging, Lindauer opens up avenues for research that scholars across a variety of fields may not have even known existed. At the same time, he creates bridges across those avenues in a way that scholars, readers, writers, and almost anyone with a healthy (or even unhealthy) dose of interest in the psychology of literature can relate and appreciate.
Dr. Scott Barry Kaufman, Co-Editor of The Psychology of Creative Writing