Part of
Changing Genre Conventions in Historical English News Discourse
Edited by Birte Bös and Lucia Kornexl
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 5] 2015
► pp. ixxiv
References (11)
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1953/1986. The problem of speech genres. In speech genres and other late essays (trans. by V. McGee, ed. by C. Emerson and M. Holquist), Texas: University of Texas Press, 60–102.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Dimensions of variation among 18th-century registers. In Hans-Jürgen Diller and Manfred Görlach (eds.), Towards a history of English as a history of genres, 89–109. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, genre and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brownlees, Nicholas (ed.). 2004. News discourse in Early Modern Britain. Selected papers of CHINED 2004. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Diller, Hans-Jürgen. 2001. Genre in linguistic and related discourses. In Hans-Jürgen Diller & Manfred Görlach (eds.), Towards a history of English as a history of genres, 3–43. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (ed.). 2009. Early Modern English news discourse. Newspapers, pamphlets and scientific news discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ljung, Magnus. 2000. Newspaper genres and newspaper English. In Friedrich Ungerer (ed.), English media texts past and present: Language and textual structure, 131–149. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moessner, Lilo. 2001. Text type, style, register: A terminological maze? European Journal of English Studies 5. 131–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solin, Anna. 2011. Genre. In Jan Zienkowski, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Discursive Pragmatics, 119–134. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001. Changing conventions of writing: The dynamics of genres, text types and text traditions. European Journal of English Studies 5. 139–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar