Index
A
- academic debate/discussionSee scholarly debate/discussion
- academic domain33–36, 40–41, 54–55, 217–218, 220, 247, 254, 302, 304, 306–307, 310, 313
- adaptation to audience demand6, 18, 22–30, 43–45, 73, 78–80, 82, 84, 87–93, 138–139, 144, 181–183, 210, 247–248, 250–251, 283–286, 287–288
- adjudication36, 38–41, 45, 147, 174n
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)53–54, 189–196, 203–204, 206–207, 215, 297, 312
- amalgamation of stylistic characteristics27, 29–30, 76, 174, 213, 291
- analytically relevant moves51, 53–55, 64–67, 104–107, 132–135, 160–167, 184, 201–203, 229, 267–275
- analytic overview6, 9–12, 20, 51, 53, 64–67, 104–107, 160–167, 185, 202–204, 229–238, 267–275, 289, 294, 301
- argument scheme12–15, 26–27, 46–50, 64, 66, 202, 269–270
- argumentation by/from example26, 72n, 108–111, 177, 186, 295
- argumentation by/from authority15–16, 108, 110–111, 176n, 203–204, 209–210, 213, 217
- causal argumentation11–12, 15–17, 36, 49–50, 64, 66, 68–71, 83, 85, 108–113, 120, 202–205, 209–210, 270, 295, 297
- complex pragmatic argumentation16–17, 36, 49, 68, 84, 91, 108, 202–207, 213, 240, 246, 249, 276, 202, 297
- complex problem-solving argumentation108–114, 119, 274, 294
- pragmatic argumentation16–17, 19, 26, 37, 49–50, 64–65, 68–70, 83–84, 108, 161, 202–205, 208–209, 232, 240, 242, 246, 269, 274–276, 286, 292, 297–299
- symptomatic argumentation12–13, 15–17, 49–50, 64–72, 83–86, 93, 108, 110–111, 150, 161, 168–171, 175–176, 184–185, 203, 210, 232, 269–270, 274–279, 281, 286, 292–293, 295–296
- argumentational argumentative strategySee argumentative strategy
- argumentation stage11, 19, 23, 25–26, 28–29, 45–46, 53, 55, 60, 83–88, 93, 123, 137, 148–150, 178, 180, 208, 210–211, 219, 222, 249, 286, 292
- argumentation structure11–12, 14–15, 46, 65, 67, 105–107, 161–167, 203, 233–237, 270–273
- coordinative15–17, 47, 50, 69–71, 83, 85–86, 108–113, 168–171, 176, 185, 204, 233, 235, 269, 271n-272, 276–279, 292–293
- multiple15–17, 47, 50, 68, 70, 83, 168, 171, 175, 185, 204–205, 270–271, 276–279, 281, 286, 296
- single15, 49–50, 161, 169, 171, 271n, 278, 281, 286
- subordinative14–15, 47, 50, 70, 72n, 119, 169–170, 175, 185, 202–203, 205–207, 209–210, 213, 233, 235
- argumentative activity type35
- argumentative characterization33–37, 42–43, 60, 76, 174, 279, 290
- argumentative cultures313
- argumentative means and criticismSee argumentation stage
- argumentative moves4, 6–7, 9–12, 14, 17–18, 20–22, 25, 27, 29–31, 43, 46–48, 50–51, 53, 55, 64–68, 104–107, 132–135, 137, 160–167, 171n, 201–203, 229–238, 267–275, 283–284
- argumentative pattern6–10, 14–16, 20–21, 27, 29, 31, 46–48, 50–55, 68–70, 76, 110–113, 168–169, 171, 173, 185, 203–204, 214, 229, 239, 275–278, 281–282, 289, 296–297, 301
- prototypical47–48, 50, 171, 185, 296
- argumentative predicament5
- argumentative strategy18–19, 73, 133, 151–152, 271, 285–286
- confrontational18, 133–135
- mouthpiece173, 176–178, 180–184
- of deduction173, 177–179, 181–184
- of distracting the other party19, 134, 137, 144
- of factualization173, 176n, 178, 180, 182
- of pressurizing the other party135
- of silencing the other party133, 137, 143–144
- argumentative style2–32, 51–55, 76–95, 115–124, 139–145, 173–187, 208–215, 247–254, 282–314
- argumentational23–24, 53, 83–87, 93–94, 119–121, 124, 174–179, 249–251, 286
- concluding23–24, 87–89, 92, 94, 122, 124, 183–184, 282, 287, 293–294, 297, 310
- confrontational23, 25, 28, 77–80, 115–117, 123, 129, 139–145, 180–181, 248, 250, 282–284, 295–302
- compromising140–141, 145, 295, 302, 305, 307, 312
- uncompromising129, 140–145, 302, 305, 307, 312
- general10, 21, 23, 27, 29, 80, 92, 124, 129, 187, 208–213, 288, 290–291, 293, 295, 297–298, 302, 304, 310
- individual6, 308, 310, 313–314
- opening23–24, 80–82, 117–119, 123, 182–183, 248, 284–285
- organisation-related313–314
- argument schemes12–15, 46–50, 64, 66, 126, 161, 185, 202–203, 210, 232–233, 269–270, 281
- audience20, 22–32, 34, 36–38, 44–45, 51, 62, 74, 80–81, 84, 86–89, 93–94, 114–115, 123, 127, 254, 294
- primary44, 73–74, 79, 82, 84, 87, 90–92, 127, 135–136, 138, 142–145, 172, 181–182, 292–293, 295, 305, 307
- secondary44, 127–128, 145, 173n, 182
- universal177–178, 186–187
- audience demand (dimension)4–6, 18, 22, 32, 43, 76, 78–79, 86, 91, 116, 118–119, 121–122, 140, 172, 174, 210–211, 213, 248–253, 283
B
- bargaining/bartering/bidding38–39
C
- categorisation of argumentative styles7, 21–24, 30–32, 301–302, 309, 312
- classification of argumentative stylesSee categorisation of argumentative styles
- causal argumentation12–13, 15–17, 19, 36, 49–50, 64, 66, 68–71, 83, 85, 108–110, 120, 202–204, 207, 238–239, 269–270, 276, 295, 297
- changing/shifting the topic130, 134, 137, 139, 141
- China’s MoFA’s regular press conferences125–128, 135
- civil court’s judgmentSee civil judgment (procedure)
- civil judgment (procedure)/legal verdict53, 147–149, 171–172, 174, 182n, 186, 296–297, 302, 308
- civil lawsuit/cases53, 147–187, 297, 303, 306, 310
- civil summary judgment procedure151–159, 184, 296
- commercial domain38, 40, 44, 53, 59, 305, 310
- communicative acts10–12, 20, 147, 245n
- communicative activity type2, 7–8, 33–53, 59–60, 76–79, 88–90, 128, 134, 139, 150, 172, 174, 180, 184, 189–196, 202–203, 206, 207, 209, 214–215, 218–220, 247, 257, 279, 289, 290–292, 294, 296, 298, 301–314
- hybrid35, 50–51, 59, 76–77, 89–90, 217, 292, 305, 309, 312
- communicative domainSee domain
- communicative practiceSee communicative activity type
- comparative research309, 312–313
- comparison argumentation12–13, 15, 49–50, 116
- complex pragmatic argumentation16–17, 36, 49, 68, 70, 91, 108–110, 114, 203–209, 213, 240, 246, 249, 276, 292, 297
- complex problem-solving argumentation108–114, 119, 274, 294
- concluding argumentative strategySee argumentative strategy
- concluding stage11, 19, 23, 25–26, 61, 78–79, 87–89, 91–93, 107, 128, 137, 148, 180, 183–184, 219n, 222, 280, 287–288, 292, 298
- confrontational argumentative strategySee argumentative strategy
- confrontation stage10–11, 18–19, 23, 60–61, 77–80, 92, 115, 128–129, 132–140, 143–144, 148, 180–181, 208, 210, 218, 222, 247, 249, 283–284, 288, 290, 292, 298, 305
- contextSee institutional macro-context
- conventionalisation of communicative practices34–38, 42–43, 150, 303, 309
- critical discussion3, 5n, 10–11n, 18, 21, 24–25, 31, 33, 35, 40, 43, 45, 52–53, 59n, 127–128, 133–145, 148, 218, 222–223, 247–249, 288, 298
- critical questionSee question in argumentative discourse
D
- declarationSee declarative
- declaring a standpoint indisputable128, 133, 135–137, 139, 141–142
- declaring a standpoint unallowed130, 132–134, 136–137, 139, 141–143
- deductionSee argumentative strategy
- deliberation35, 37–38, 41, 44–45, 51, 57–59, 77, 90
- detached argumentative styles7, 21–32, 51, 76–79, 85–89, 92–94, 123–124, 139–145, 174, 177–187, 209–210, 213, 247–251, 254, 282–288, 291, 293, 295, 297, 299–313
- basically140, 143–145, 305, 307
- in a specific sense41, 302, 305, 308
- compromising140–141, 144–145, 295, 302, 305, 307, 312
- demonstrably177, 181, 186–187, 297, 302, 305, 308, 311–312
- uncompromising140–145, 295. 302, 305, 307, 312
- to a certain degree/extent174n, 302, 304
- fully/full-blown/fully-fledged25, 187, 297, 302
- mostly/predominantly86, 94, 123–124, 174, 254, 284–288, 295, 302, 304
- dialectical approach3, 59n
- dialectical route6–17, 20–21, 25–31, 45–55, 61, 68–72, 76, 107–113, 120, 135n, 168–172, 203–205, 229, 244, 275–279, 281–282, 288–291, 297, 300–301
- difference of opinion3–20, 27, 30, 31, 37–42, 46–48, 57–60, 64, 66, 77, 79, 104, 108, 131, 134, 139–153, 160, 180, 184–185, 198, 201, 208, 210, 229–230, 245, 256–257, 267–268, 289, 292, 294, 296
- multiple mixed15, 50, 104, 148–149, 294
- multiple non-mixed15, 50, 148
- single mixed15, 50, 148–149
- single non-mixed15, 50, 148
- diplomatic domain33, 36, 38, 44–45, 52–53, 302, 305, 310
- direct-to-consumer advertisement255
- disagreement space19, 180, 182
- discussion strategySee argumentative strategy,general
- Disjunctive Syllogism,See logical argument form
- dispute mediation189, 195
- dissociation/dissociating the meaning11n, 132–133, 136, 138, 141
- distracting the other partySee argumentative strategy
- diversity of argumentative styles290, 301
- doctor-patient consultation/exchangesSee medical consultation
- domain1–2, 6–8, 33–42, 44–46, 48–49, 51–55, 59, 147, 150, 189, 218, 220, 247, 254–255, 289, 302–307, 310–312
- Dutch civil lawsuitSee civil lawsuit/cases
E
- election campaign57–62, 79, 88, 92, 293, 304, 311
- negative campaigning60–61, 72–74, 83, 90, 292
- positive campaigning60, 74, 78–79, 86, 88, 99, 92
- encyclopaedia (entries)41, 220, 313
- engaged argumentative styles7, 21–24, 27–29, 30–32, 51, 76–94, 124, 140, 143, 145, 174n, 181, 208–215, 247–250, 282–288, 291–294, 298–313
- in a specific sense302, 305, 308
- (re)conciliatory22, 31, 211, 214, 302, 307–308, 312
- to a certain degree / extent174n, 302, 304
- full-blown/ fully(-fledged)28, 92, 211, 213–215, 293, 298, 302, 308
- mostly / predominantly94, 302, 304
- European Predicament34n, 43
- evidence-based medicine255, 280–281, 300
- extending the scope of empirical research309–310
- extrinsic constraintsSee institutional preconditions
F
- facilitatory domain36, 40, 45, 53–54, 189, 302, 307
- factualizationSee argumentative strategy
- family-centred rounds in medical consultation55, 259–275, 279, 284, 286, 288, 302, 306
- Five Principles of Peaceful Co-existence127, 132, 295
- functional utilisation argumentative styles300–310
G
- genre of communication35–42, 53–54, 57, 189–190, 311
- getting to a compromise38, 44–45, 97, 140–141
H
- handbook, companion, introduction41, 220, 313
- hybrid communicative activity type35, 50–51, 59, 76–77, 89–90, 217, 292, 305, 309, 312
I
- identification of argumentative style3–4, 6–7, 20–21, 32, 51, 53, 55, 61, 64, 72, 76–77, 82, 172–174, 181, 193, 195, 208, 279, 295, 301, 310
- informative questionSee question in argumentative discourse
- informed consent42, 258–259, 269, 299
- initial situationSee confrontation stage
- institutional macro-context33–34, 37–43, 46–48, 140–141, 180, 192, 195, 289–303, 306–308, 310–312, 314
- institutional point28, 34, 42, 47–48, 50, 59, 90, 127, 217n-220, 247, 301, 305, 307
- institutional preconditions34, 42–46, 48, 59, 63, 76, 129, 138, 142, 150, 172, 174, 181–182, 185, 256, 258–259, 267, 279, 282, 290–291, 295–296, 299, 302–304, 306–310, 313–314
- primary34, 44–45, 127–128, 290, 303, 306
- secondary34, 43, 62, 127, 142
- interpersonal conflict mediationSee mediation
- interpersonal domain34n, 310
- intersubjective validity59n
- inventory of argumentative stylesSee categorisation of argumentative styles
J
- judge’s motivation of a verdictSee motivation legal verdict
- justification principle Dutch constitutional law147n, 175, 180
L
- legal domain33, 35–36, 39, 45, 48–49, 53, 147, 302–306, 310
- legislative debate European ParliamentSee plenary debate European Parliament
- levels of defence13–14, 47–48, 50, 64, 66, 71–72, 85, 105–106, 109, 114, 120, 123, 161, 170, 206, 269–270, 272, 278, 293–294, 297, 300
- linguistic style2, 4, 87, 151n, 289, 301
- logical argument form
- Disjunctive Syllogism16–17, 64, 68–69, 78, 87, 292
- Modus Ponens161, 168, 170, 185
M
- macro-contextual constraintsSee institutional preconditions
- maximally argumentative analysis, strategy of271n
- maximally argumentative interpretation, strategy of171n
- mediation8, 36–40, 45, 53–54, 189–215, 290, 297–298, 302–308, 312
- mediation style54, 192–193, 196, 214
- mediator styleSee mediation style
- mediators’ opening statement192–215, 297–298, 302, 308
- medical consultation37, 41–42, 45, 49, 55, 255–260, 267, 279–282, 288, 290, 299–302, 310, 313
- medical domain37, 41–42, 49–50, 55, 255–258, 299–300, 302, 306–307, 310, 313
- medical rounds42, 259–261, 280, 282
- mission34, 38, 44–45, 304
- mixture of argumentative styles77, 300, 305–306
- mock mediation54, 193, 197
- Modus PonensSee logical argument form
- model of a critical discussionSee critical discussion
- motivation legal verdict33, 36, 39, 303
- mouthpiece strategySee argumentative strategy
- multiple argumentation15–17n, 68, 83, 169, 204–205, 270–271, 276–279, 281, 286
N
- negative campaigningSee election campaign
- negotiation36, 38–39, 44, 189, 193, 196, 211
- nurse-patient interactions42, 268
O
- opening argumentative strategySee argumentative strategy
- opening speech rapporteur European Parliament52, 95, 98–104, 107, 113, 115–124, 294, 302, 304, 308
- opening stage10–11, 19, 23, 25, 28, 45–46, 55, 60–61, 81–82, 87–93, 105, 128, 148, 182–183, 210, 219, 222–223, 231–232, 248, 280, 284–285, 288–292, 298
- outcome11–12, 19, 24, 26, 29–31, 35–49, 65, 67, 87–88, 93, 107, 122, 148–150, 167, 183–186, 237–238, 273–274, 296–297
P
- parliamentary debateSee plenary debate European Parliament
- patient-centred medicine255, 258–259, 282, 288, 300, 313
- peer commentary222–223, 225–226
- peer-reviewed research paper54, 218–221, 298–299, 302
- perlocutionary effect/consequence/level60n, 245n
- personal attack132–133, 136, 138, 141–142
- playing down the opponent19
- plenary debate European Parliament34–37, 43, 52, 95–119, 294–295, 302, 304, 307
- point of departure12, 19, 25, 43, 64–66, 74–76, 79–82, 90, 105, 137, 160–161, 182, 202, 268–269, 292
- polarizing argumentative style22
- polarizing-conciliatory distinction22, 247
- political advertisement/advertising35, 51–52, 59–62, 72n, 76–79, 88–90, 181n, 290, 292, 302, 304–305, 309
- political domain8, 33, 35, 44, 49, 51–52, 302–304, 307
- political group European Parliament95–98, 102, 105, 118, 121
- positive campaigningSee election campaign
- pragmatic argumentation16–17, 19, 26, 36–37, 49–50, 64–65, 68–70, 83–84, 91, 108, 161, 202–209, 213, 232, 240, 242, 246, 249, 269, 274–276, 286, 292, 297, 299
- pragmatic problem-solving argumentationSee complex pragmatic argumentation
- pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation3–6, 10–20, 148, 219n, 229, 276, 301–302
- pragma-dialecticsSee pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation
- presentational choice/device (dimension)4, 18, 52–55, 61, 73, 76–82, 85, 87–94, 115–116, 119–121, 124, 138–141, 144, 172–174, 178–187, 195, 208, 211–214, 247–254, 282–302, 306
- pressurizing the other partySee argumentative strategy
- principle of autonomy258, 299
- problem-based approach to mediation196
- problem statement108–111, 118–120, 123, 294
- professional argumentative style308–309
- Program on Negotiation (PON)196–197
- promotion35, 59, 63, 77, 89–90, 174n, 292
- prototypical argumentative pattern45–50, 171, 185, 296
- prototypical argumentative style125, 145, 208, 300, 305–311, 313–314
- putting pressure on the other party135, 137, 139, 141
Q
- quantitative methods47n, 219, 239, 253, 309, 311
- question in argumentative discourse
- critical13–14, 26, 46–50, 70, 114, 126, 150, 184, 296
R
- rapporteur European Parliament52, 95, 97–105, 107, 109–110, 114–122, 294–295, 302
- reconciliatory argumentative styleSee engaged argumentative style
- reconstruction of argumentative discourse6, 9–10, 12, 64, 69, 75–76, 160–161, 208, 282, 289, 300–301
- relationship-based approach to mediation196
- research article/paper54, 218–224, 231, 240, 247, 252–253, 290, 298–299, 307
- response diplomatic spokesperson at China’s MoFA’s press conferences36, 52, 129–131, 302, 313
S
- scholarly articleSee peer-reviewed research paper
- scholarly debate/discussion33, 36, 43, 228, 247, 290, 302–304, 306, 313
- shared decision-making258–259
- silencing the other partySee argumentative strategy
- speech actsSee communicative acts
- stages of the argumentative process5n, 7, 10–11, 19, 21, 23–25, 28, 31, 35, 43–44, 55, 77–80, 88–94, 128, 148, 150, 184, 187, 208, 210, 213, 218, 222, 247, 288–290, 293–295, 298
- standpoint5, 11–15, 24, 35–37, 39, 45–50, 104, 110, 113, 136, 148, 219n
- descriptive13–16, 35–36, 45, 50
- evaluative13–15, 35, 37, 45, 48–50, 60, 149, 160, 168, 170–171, 176, 180, 185, 296
- prescriptive13–17, 35–36, 45, 48, 50, 60, 64, 66, 68–71, 76, 79, 86, 107–108, 110–114, 148, 201, 204–205, 268, 274, 276–278, 290–293, 299
- starting pointsSee opening stage
- stereotypical argumentative style47n, 307, 311
- strategic considerations6, 17–20, 72–77, 80–83, 86, 92, 113–115, 135–139, 172–173, 180, 205–207, 244–246, 279–281, 285, 292–297, 300–301, 310
- strategic design6–10, 17–21, 27, 29–31, 51–55, 72–73, 75–76, 138, 141, 172–174, 177, 179, 186–187, 207, 210, 215, 229, 245, 279–282, 289, 291, 301
- strategic manoeuvres/manoeuvring3–7, 18–21, 33–34, 38, 43–45, 47, 51, 53, 55, 72–76, 83, 89–90, 92, 129–130, 133, 136–139, 141, 144, 172–173, 180, 205, 213, 279–281, 285, 289–295, 300–303, 310
- aspects of3–4, 18, 43, 138, 289, 300
- confrontational129–131, 141, 295
- strategic scenario9, 20–22, 24–25, 27–28, 30–31
- styleSee linguistic style
- sub-category argumentative styleSee categorisation of argumentative styles
- sub-discussion192, 195, 198n, 201–202, 229, 231, 237, 249, 270, 297
- symptomatic argumentation12–13, 15–17, 49–50, 64–72, 83–86, 93, 108, 110–111, 150, 161, 168–171, 150, 168–171, 175–176, 184–185, 203, 210, 232, 269–270, 274–279, 281, 286, 292–293, 295–296
T
- topical choice/selection (dimension)4–6, 22–29, 43, 61, 73, 76–86, 88–89, 91, 93, 115–116, 118–120, 122, 138–139, 141, 143, 170, 172–177, 179–183, 186–187, 195, 208–210, 213, 247–252, 282, 286–287, 290–291, 293–294, 297–298, 300
- topical potential4–5, 18, 253, 281, 283, 285, 288, 295
- traditional view of styleSee linguistic style
- transfer of prototypical stylistic flavour311
- treatment decision255, 258, 260–261, 274, 285–286, 288
- type of argumentationSee argument schemes
- typology of argumentative stylesSee categorisation of argumentative styles