Article published In:
AILA Review: Online-First Articles

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) of CLIL pedagogy and globalisation in Japan

ORCID logo | CLIL Institute for Teacher Education
 | Tohoku University
The paper discusses the potential of CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) pedagogy in the current practice of ELT (English Language Teaching) and the issues of global education from a viewpoint of DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) in Japan. DEI into CLIL pedagogy ensures a variety of learning environments, appropriate CLIL learning, and a sense of belonging. CLIL can also provide better ideas and resources to cultivate DEI. This paper therefore argues that CLIL pedagogy has the potential to change and incorporate issues related to DEI. The Japan CLIL Pedagogy Association (J-CLIL) conducted a questionnaire survey on CLIL and its sponsored events and activities in 2021. Results show that: (1) many teachers are not aware of DEI; (2) their mindset can become gradually diverse; (3) current education lacks equity with respect to students; and (4) inclusive education is still not satisfactory. Ensuring equity in DEI is crucial in the realm of CLIL teacher education. Therefore, it is imperative for CLIL teacher education to be more attuned to DEI concerns to enhance the implementation of CLIL practices effectively. The DEI process needs to be integrated into CLIL and globalisation within the Japanese context. For that purpose, there needs to be more research and practice necessary to promote a CLIL type of languages-integrated learning, and this paper argues that it can be done through the IMT (Integrated Multifunctional Teacher) development program in Japan.
Keywords: CLIL pedagogy, DEI, ELT, globalisation, Integrated Multifunctional Teacher
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.CLIL pedagogy and globalisation
  • 3.CLIL pedagogy and DEI
  • 4.CLIL pedagogy in Japan
    • 4.1CLIL implementation through the viewpoint of diversity
    • 4.2The role of translanguaging and scaffolding for equity
    • 4.3The state of CLIL affairs associated with inclusion
  • 5.Awareness of DEI in CLIL pedagogy
  • 6.CLIL awareness based on the research in Japan
    • 6.1The questionnaire survey
    • 6.2The applied analysis for the ongoing characteristics of CLIL implementation
    • 6.3Teacher awareness of DEI and CLIL pedagogy
      • 6.3.1Diversity
      • 6.3.2Equity
      • 6.3.3Inclusion
      • 6.3.4DEI necessary for CLIL pedagogy
    • 6.4CLIL teacher education and DEI
  • 7.A new challenge for CLIL
  • 8.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 12 November 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.24003.sas
References (100)
References
Airey, J. (2016). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) and English for Academic Purposes (EAP). In K. Hyland. & P. Shaw (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (pp. 71–83). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Azevedo, J. P., Wagner, D., Rogers, F. H., Cloutier, M. H., Chakroun, B., Chang, G. C., & Mizunoya, S. (2021). The State of the Global Education Crisis: A Path to Recovery. UNESCO, UNICEF, World Bank. [URL]
Benesse. (2022). Benesse Report 2022. [URL]
Bolton, K., Botha, W., & Kirkpatrick, A. (Eds.). (2020). The Handbook of Asian Englishes. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. (2014). Contextual factors driving the growth of undergraduate English-medium instruction programmes at universities in Japan. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 50–63.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruton, A. (2013). CLIL: Some of the Reasons Why … and Why Not. System, 411, 587–597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). CLIL: Detail Matters in the Whole Picture. More Than a Reply to J. Hüttner & U. Smit. (2014). System, 531, 119–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Questions About CLIL Which are Unfortunately Still not Outdated: A Reply to Pérez-Cañado. Applied Linguistics Review, 10 (4), 591–602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Y. G. (2007). Factors associated with the notion that native speakers are ideal language teachers: an examination of elementary school teachers in Japan. JALT journal, 29 (1). 7–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2021). CLIL vs EMI: Different approaches or the same dog with a different collar? In M. L. Carrió-Pastor & B. Bellés-Fortuño (Eds.), Teaching language and content in multicultural and multilingual classrooms. Palgrave Macmillan. 13–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, G. (2014). Critical Analysis of CLIL Taking Stock and Looking Forward. Applied Linguistics, 35 (3), 243–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chawala, S. (2021, February 18). Education in Japan. In EDUCATION SYSTEM PROFILES. WENR. [URL]
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (1999). Supporting students in content and language integrated learning contexts: Planning for effective classrooms. In J. Masih (Ed.), Learning through a Foreign Language: Models, Methods and Outcomes (pp. 46–62). London: CILT.Google Scholar
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dafouz, E. & Smit, U. (2016). Towards a Dynamic Conceptual Framework for English-Medium Education in Multilingual University Settings. Applied Linguistics, 37(3), 397–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dafouz, E., & Smit, U. (2019). ROAD-MAPPING English Medium Education in the Internationalised University. Cham: Palgrave Pivot.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: from practice to principles? Annual Review of applied linguistics, 31 1, 182–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., Lorenzo, F. & Nikula, T. (2014). You can stand under my umbrella. Immersion, CLIL and Bilingual Education. A response to Cenoz, Genesee & Gorter (2013), Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 213–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. (2003). The Native Speaker: Myth and Reality. London: Cromwell Press Ltd.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenton-Smith, B., Humphreys, P., & Walkinshaw, I. (Eds.). (2017). English Medium Instruction in Higher Education in Asia-Pacific. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcia, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: a global perspective. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gilanyi, L., Gao, X., & Wang, S. (2023). EMI and CLIL in Asian schools: A scoping review of empirical research between 2015 and 2022. Heliyon, 91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Global Education Monitoring Report Team. (2023). Global education monitoring report, 2023: technology in education: a tool on whose terms? Paris: UNESCO. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graddol, D. (2006). English Next: Why Global English May Mean the End of ‘English as a Foreign Language’. UK: British Council.Google Scholar
Holliday, A. R. (2005). The struggle to teach English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. (2021). Education and Elitism. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hüttner, J. & Smit, U. (2014). CLIL (content and language integrated learning): The bigger picture. A response to: A. Bruton. 2013. CLIL: Some of the reasons why… and why not. System 41 (2013): 587–597. System, 441, 160–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ichikawa, S. (1991). Distinctive Features of Japanese Education NIER Occasional Paper. National Institute for Educational Research. [URL]
Ikeda, M., Izumi, S., Watanabe, Y., Pinner, R., & Davis, M. (2021). Soft CLIL and English Language Teaching Understanding Japanese Policy, Practice and Implications. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imura, M. (2003). Nihon no Eigokyoiku 200 nen (Two hundred years of the Japanese Education). Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Institute for International Cooperation Japan International Cooperation Agency. (2004). The History of Japan’s Educational Development: What implications can be drawn for developing countries today. Tokyo: JICA. [URL]
Japan Business Federation (Keidanren). (2000). Gurobaru-ka Jidai no Jinzai Ikusei ni Tsuite (Report on Fostering Human Resources in the Age of Globalization). [URL]
J-CLIL Survey Committee. (2022). J-CLIL Survey Report on CLIL Pedagogy in Japan 2021. Tokyo: J-CLIL. [URL]
Jones, A. B. (2019). The Role of English Education in Japan. Memoirs of Learning Utility Center for Konan University Students, 41. 21–31.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, B. (2016). Native speakerism and English language education in Japan. Bulletin of the Institute for Excellence in Higher Education Tohoku University, 21, 201–209.Google Scholar
(2023). A CLIL Course on Karate and Japanese Culture: Developing Intercultural Awareness and Language Learning. In T. Muller, J. Adamson, S. Herder, & P. S. Brown (Eds.), Re-Envisioning EFL Education in Asia. Sheridan (pp. 43–59). WY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kerr, K. & Ainscow, M. (2017). Equity in Education: Time to stop and think. A report on the state of equity in the English education system. Manchester: The University of Manchester. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, A. (2017). Language education policy among the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). European Journal of Language Policy. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, A. & Lixun, W. (Eds.). (2021). Is English an Asian Language? Queensland, Hong Kong: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kubota, R. (2015). Globalization and Language Education in Japan. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl, & S. May (Eds.), Second and Foreign Language Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, A. & Man, E. (2009). Bilingual Education: Southeast Asian Perspectives. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llinares, A. & Cross, R. (2022). New challenges for CLIL research. AILA Review, 35(2), 169–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition 3791 (pp. 259–278). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madrid, D., & Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2018). Innovations and Challenges in Attending to Diversity Through CLIL. Theory Into Practice, 57 (3), 241–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maljers, A., Marsh, D., & Wolff, D. (2007). Windows on CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in the European Spotlight. The Hague: European Platform for Dutch Education.Google Scholar
Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE — the European dimension: actions, trends and foresight potential. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
McKinsey & Company. (2022). How COVID-19 caused a global learning crisis. [URL]
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Oxford: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
Mensel, L. V., Hiligsmann, P., Mettewie, L., & Galand, B. (2020). CLIL, an elitist language learning approach? A background analysis of English and Dutch CLIL pupils in French-speaking Belgium. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 33(1), 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MEXT. (2002, December 15). Japanese Government Policies in Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 2002. [URL]
. (2020, September 15). Education in Japan beyond the crisis of COVID-19 -Leave No One Behind-. [URL]
Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Schuck, K., & Ting, T. (2015). A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning — mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 41–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. A. & Polinsky, M. (Eds.) (2022). The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics. (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murata, K. (2019). The realities of the use of English in the globalised world and the teaching of English: a discrepancy? JACET Journal 2019. 631, 7–26.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Y. (2016). Globalization of English and English language teaching in Asia. The Hiyoshi review of natural science Keio University. Language, culture, and communication, 481, 117–127.Google Scholar
(2017). Fundamental Issues on the Globalization of English and English Language Teaching in Japan. Educational Studies 59 International Christian University, 177–182.Google Scholar
Negishi, M. (2012). The development of the CEFR-J: Where we are, where we are going. Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research Research Project Report, 105–116.Google Scholar
NIER. (2022, December 23). National Institute for Educational Policy Research 2022. [URL]
Nikula, T., Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinates, A., & Lorenzo, F. (2016). More than content and language: the complexity of integration in CLIL and multilingual education. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, & U. Smit (Eds.), Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education. (pp. 1–25). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikula, T., Skinnari, K., & Mård-Miettinen, K. (2022). Diversity in CLIL as experienced by Finnish CLIL teachers and students: matters of equality and equity, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 26,(9), 1066–1079. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nishimura-Sahi, O. (2020). Policy borrowing of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) in Japan: An analysis of the interplay between global education trends and national policymaking. Asian Pacific Journal of Education, 42 (3), 574–587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
NIRA. (2023). Watashi no Koso, 67 1. [URL]
OECD. (2018a, December 23). PISA 2018 Global Competence. [URL]
. (2018b). Preparing our youth for an inclusive and sustainable world. The OECD PISA global competence framework. Paris. [URL]
. (2019). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. Paris: TALIS, OECD Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2020a). PISA 2018 Results: Are students ready to thrive in an interconnected world? Volume VI. Paris. [URL]
. (2020b). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume II): Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals. Paris: TALIS, OECD Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohmori, A. (2014). Exploring the Potential of CLIL in English Language Teaching in Japanese Universities: An Innovation for the Development of Effective Teaching and Global Awareness. The Journal of Rikkyo University Language Center, 321, 39–51.Google Scholar
Osaki Exum, A. (2023, December 28). How Japan’s international school landscape is evolving. The Japan Times. [URL]
Paran, A. (2013). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Panacea or Policy Borrowing Myth? Applied Linguistics Review, 4 (2), 317–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parra, M. O. & Proctor, P. (2022). The Translanguaging Pedagogies Continuum. The Journal of Education, 1–22. [URL]
Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2017). Stopping the “pendulum effect” in CLIL research: Finding the balance between Pollyanna and Scrooge. Applied Linguistics Review. 8(1), 79–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023). Guest editorial. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 26(9). 1015–1021, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, H., Sahan, K., & Zhou, S. (2022). Global English Medium Instruction: Perspectives at the crossroads of Global Englishes and EMI. Asian Englishes, 24(2), 160–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sakamoto, M. (2012). Moving towards effective English language teaching in Japan: issues and challenges. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33(4), 409–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasajima, S. (2008). CLIL and LSP. Otsuka Forum. 261, 50–56.Google Scholar
(2014). An Exploratory Study of Japanese EFL Teachers’ Kokoro. Verlag: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
(2019). Teacher Development: J-CLIL. In K. Tsuchiya & M. D. Perez-Murillo. (eds.). Content and Language Integrated Learning in Spanish and Japanese Contexts: Policy, Practice and Pedagogy. Cham: Palgrave, 287–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasajima, S., Yamano, Y., Isobe, S., Machida, J., Sakamoto, H., Takizawa, M., Gidoin, K., Takahashi, N., Matsuura, Y., Okio, R., Kanbara, J., Ichiyanagi, K., Miyata, K., Pakula, H. M., & Wewer, T. (2019). Manabi wo Tsunagu Shogakko Gaikokugo Kyoiku no CLIL Jissen. Tokyo: Sanshusha.Google Scholar
Sasajima, S. (2020). Kyoiku toshiteno CLIL (CLIL Pedagogy in Japan). Tokyo: Sanshusha.Google Scholar
Sasajima, S., Lin, A. M. Y. & He, P., Yang, W., Harada, T., Tsuchiya, K., & Ikeda, M. (2020). Featured Article: Collaboration of CLIL pedagogy in Asia. The Journal of the Japan CLIL Pedagogy Association (JJCLIL) 2 1, 7–38.Google Scholar
Sasajima, S. (2022). Integrated Multifunctional Teacher (IMT) Education for Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education: A View from English Language Teaching (ELT). A Report on Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research(KAKEN) Results. [URL]
Scholastic Inc. (2016). Teachers and Principals School Report: Equity in Education. [URL]
Seidel, J. V. (1998). Qualitative data analysis. (originally published as Qualitative Data Analysis in The Ethnograph v5.0: A Users Guide, Appendix E, 1998, Colorado Springs, CO: Qualis Research.) [URL]
Stew, M. (2018). The CEFR and English Education in Japan. Journal of Policy Studies 56 1. 33–38.Google Scholar
Tsuchiya, K., & Pérez Murillo, M. D. (Eds.). (2019). Content and language integrated learning in Spanish and Japanese contexts: Policy, practice and pedagogy. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
UN ESCAP. (2023). Asia and the Pacific SDG progress report 2023. United Nations Publication. [URL]
UNDP. (2023, November 4). UNDP CAREERS. Diversity, Equity And Inclusion. [URL]
UNICEF. (2023a, October 21). Inclusive education: Every child has the right to quality education and learning. [URL]
. (2023b, December 10). UNICEF and the Sustainable Development Goals. [URL]
Williams, C. (1994). Arfarniad o ddulliau dysgu ac addysgu yng nghyd-destun addysguwchradd ddwyieithog [An evaluation of teaching and learning methods in the context of bilingual secondary education]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Bangor, UK: University of Wales.
Vickers, E. & Un, L. (2019). Editorial — Asian perspectives on diversity and its　implications for education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(2), 159–164, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yamanaka, S., Suzuki, K. H. (2020). Japanese Education Reform Towards Twenty-First Century Education. In F. M. Reimers. (eds.). Audacious Education Purposes. Springer, Cham. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, A. (2017). Global Human Resource Development’ and Japanese University Education: ‘Localism’ in Actor Discussions. Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook, 111. 83–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zein, S. & Butler, Y. G. (2022). English for Young Learners in Asia: Challenges and Directions for Teacher Education. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar