Cover not available
Article published In:
Qualitative Research on Language Learning Strategies and Self-Regulation
Edited by Nathan Thomas, Jason Schneider and Sihan Zhou
[AILA Review 37:2] 2024
► pp. 334–359

Investigating language learning strategy use in adult L2 literacy

A constructivist grounded theory

ORCID logo | University of Amsterdam
The study focuses on the language learning experiences of adult migrants from refugee backgrounds with limited educational experiences before migration. This group is often referred to as LESLLA learners; LESLLA is an acronym for Literacy Education and Second Language Learning for Adults. The study used Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) — a data-driven, bottom-up methodology for qualitative research — to gain understanding of the conditions that help or hinder LESLLA learners’ language development and of the strategies they use to enhance learning and to overcome obstacles. The dataset is comprised of thirty interviews with adult refugees from Syria and Eritrea learning Dutch in the Netherlands. The analyses identified self-efficacy, which has been described as ‘the soul of strategies’ (Oxford, 2017), as a core category, differentiating between learners who showed contentment about their language learning achievements and expressed confidence in further learning, and those who expressed little confidence and a sense of failure. Conditions hindering self-efficacy include the cognitive conditions ‘forgetting’ and ‘stress’, and the social condition ‘isolation’. Facilitative conditions in the cognitive realm are ‘motivation’ and ‘language learning strategies’. ‘Social strategies in new social networks’ is the condition that stands out as strongly supportive for self-efficacy. The data showed how LESLLA learners are often not in the position of power to build their networks. This means that social strategies are not an individuals’ asset but rather a condition that is distributed in a social system.
Keywords: Language Learning Strategies, motivation, self-efficacy, adult literacy, LESLLA, grounded theory, civic integration
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1A research gap
    • 1.2Strategy research in the LESLLA field
    • 1.3Civic integration policy in the Netherlands
    • 1.4Research questions
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Constructivist grounded theory
    • 2.2Researcher positionality
    • 2.3Participants
    • 2.4Interpreters
    • 2.5Interviews
    • 2.6Data analyses and coding
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Main helping and hindering conditions
    • 3.2The learners’ voices
      • Motivation, hopes and aspiration
      • Language learning strategies
      • Hindrances for learning
    • 3.3Motivation
    • 3.4Self-efficacy
    • 3.5Summarizing the findings
  • 4.Concluding discussion
    • 4.1Motivation and investment
    • 4.2Language learning strategies
    • 4.3Limitations and suggestions for further research
  • Note
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 22 November 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.24017.dal
References (48)
References
Algemene Rekenkamer. (2017). Inburgering. Eerste resultaten van de Wet inburgering 2013. Algemene Rekenkamer.Google Scholar
Andringa, S., & Godfroid, A. (2020). Sampling bias and the problem of generalizability in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 40 1, 134–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Benseman, J. (2014). Adult refugee learners with limited literacy: Needs and effective responses. Refuge, 30 (1), 93–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bigelow, M., & Tarone, E. (2004). The role of literacy level in second language acquisition: Doesn’t who we study determine what we know? TESOL Quarterly, 38 (4), 689–700. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded Theory (4th ed.). Sage.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (2011). Strategies in learning and using a second language. (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohen, Andrew D., Yongqi Gu, P., Nyikos, M., Plonsky, L., Harris, V., Gunning, P., Kai-Hui Wang, I., Pawlak, M., Gavriilidou, Z., Mitits, L., Sykes, J. M., & Gao, X. (2023). Tangible insights on the strategizing of language learners and users. Language Teaching, 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment.Google Scholar
Dalderop, K., Andringa, S., & Rispens, J. (2023). Strategy focused instruction in literacy education and second language learning for adults (LESLLA) in the Netherlands. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35 1, 36–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darvin, Ron, & Norton, B. (2021). Investment and motivation in language learning: What’s the difference? Language Teaching. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Waal, T. (2017). UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Conditional belonging. A legal-philosophical inquiry into integration requirements for immigrants in Europe. [URL]
Deygers, B., & Vanbuel, M. (2022). Gauging the impact of literacy and educational background on receptive vocabulary scores. Language Testing, 39 (2), 191–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 Motivational Self System. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self (pp. 9–42). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2021). Teaching and Researching Motivation (3rd ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, A., Baker, S., Charitonos, K., Jack, V., & Moser-Mercer, B. (2020). Ethics-in-practice in fragile contexts: Research in education for displaced persons, refugees and asylum seekers. British Educational Research Journal, 46 (4), 829–847. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerson, K., & Damaske, S. (2021). The science and art of interviewing. In The Science and Art of Interviewing. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, C., & Cansiz, G. (2015). Language Learning strategies: An holistic view. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5 (3), 473–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Carol. (2020). Language learning strategies: Is the baby still in the bathwater? Applied Linguistics, 41 (4), 607–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groenendijk, C. A., de Hart, B., & van Oers, R. (2021). Lessen van 25 jaar inburgering in Nederland. Nederlands Juristenblad, 33 1.Google Scholar
Hadley, G. (2017). Grounded Theory in SLA (1st ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Harris, V. (2019). Diversity and integration in language learning strategy instruction. In A. U. Chamot & V. Harris (Eds.), Learning strategy instruction in the language classroom. (pp. 38–52). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hollifeld, M., Warner, T. B., Krakow, B., & Westermeyer, J. (2018). Mental health effects of stress over the life span of refugees. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 7 (25), 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, A. G. D. (2020). Researcher positionality- A consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research- A new researcher guide. International Journal of Educational Research, 8 (4), 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hooft, H., Vandermeerschen, H., Chakkar, S., Vandommele, G., De Cuyper, P., & Schiepers, M. (2020). Laaggeletterheid bij volwassen nieuwkomers in de Belgische asielopvang. [URL]
Housen, M. (2022). Stagneren in het taalleerproces. Les, 40 (221). [URL]
Huang, J., & Newbern, C. (2012). The effects of meta-cognitive reading strategy instruction on reading performance of adult ESL learners with limited English and literacy skills. Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary and Basic Education, 1 (2), 66–78.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. (2016). The discourse of language learning strategies: towards an inclusive approach. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20 (8), 855–870. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
King, K. A., & Bigelow, M. (2012). Acquiring English while learning to do school: Resistance and accommodation. In P. Vinogradov & M. Bigelow (Eds.), Low Educated Second Language and Literacy Acquisition (pp. 157–182). University of Minnesota. [URL]
Kosny, A., MacEachen, E., Lifshen, M., & Smith, P. (2014). Another person in the room: Using interpreters during interviews with immigrant workers. Qualitative Health Research, 24 (6), 837–845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaud, A. H., Fortier, V., & Amireault, V. (2022). “Do I have to sign my real name?” Ethical and methodological challenges in multilingual research with adult SLIFE learning French as a second language. Languages, 7 (126), 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naif, A. H., & Saad, N. S. M. (2017). Language learning strategies use and challenges faced by adult arab learners of Finnish as a second language in Finland. English Language Teaching, 10 (4), 111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norlund Shaswar, A., & Wedin, A. (2019). Language learning strategies and teaching practices in adult L2 education: The case of Swedish for immigrants. Apples Journal of Applied Language Studies, 13 (3), 17–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norton, B. (2013). Identity and Language Learning (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2005). For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. Modern Language Journal, 89 (3), 427–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford, R. L. (1989). Strategy Inventory for Language Learning Version 7.0.Google Scholar
(2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Routledge.Google Scholar
Reimer, J. (2008). Learning Strategies and Low-Literacy Hmong Adult Students. [URL]
Rocca, L., Carlsen, C. H., & Deygers, B. (2020). Linguistic integration of adult migrants: requirements and learning opportunities. [URL]
Significant. (2018). Inburgering: systeemwereld versus leefwereld: Evaluatie Wet inburgering 2013.Google Scholar
Strube, S. (2014). Worstelen met de mondelinge vaardigheden. Les, 32 (192). [URL]
(2015). Het is makkelijker gezegd dan gedaan. Kopzorgen in de alfaklas. Les, 33 1(online only). [URL]
Thomas, N., & Rose, H. (2019). Do language learning strategies need to be self-directed? Disentangling strategies from self-regulated learning. TESOL Quarterly, 53 (1), 248–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vluchtelingenwerk Nederland. (2021). Vluchtelingen in getallen 2021. Vluchtelingenwerk Nederland. [URL]
[URL] . (2024). [URL]
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Thomas, Nathan, Jason Schneider & Sihan Zhou
2024. Qualitative research on language learning strategies and self-regulation. AILA Review 37:2 ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.