Sports coaching scholars increasingly understand coaching as a socio-pedagogical activity consisting of social interactions between coaches and athletes that aim to teach and improve skills and competencies. Coach feedback for the purpose of correcting player performance is a core feature of this activity, but coaching scholarship exploring the fine-grained organization of coaching corrections remains minimal. This chapter examines how correction events in basketball training are interactionally organized via participants’ mobilization of sequential embodied and linguistic resources. The analysis centres on the participants’ collaborative production and use of reenactments as a means of correcting player conduct, illuminating how the coach and players collaborate to configure an intercorporeal context that enables players to see and feel problematic performances and their correct alternatives.
Cushion, C. (2007). Modelling the complexity of the coaching process. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 2(4), 395–401.
Cushion, C., Armour, K., & Jones, R. L. (2006). Locating the coaching process in practice: Models ‘for’ and ‘of’ coaching. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 11(1), 83–99.
Evans, B. (2013). Order on the court: The interactional organization of basketball practice activities. (Doctoral thesis), University of Western Sydney, Australia.
Evans, B., & Reynolds, E. (2016). The organization of corrective demonstrations using embodied action in sports coaching feedback. Symbolic Interaction, 39(4), 525–556.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Garfinkel, H. (ed.). (1986). Ethnomethodological studies of work. London: Routledge.
Garfinkel, H., & Wieder, D. L. (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 175–206). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Goodwin, C. (1995). Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science, 25(2), 237–274.
Goodwin, C. (2003). The body in action. In J. Coupland & R. Gwyn (eds.), Discourse, the body, and identity (pp. 19–42). Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organisation of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73.
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. In Y. Engestrom & D. Middleton (eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 61–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne and Madrid: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2013). Embodied action and organizational activity. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 283–307). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hindmarsh, J., Hyland, L., & Banerjee. (2014). Work to make simulation work: ‘Realism’, instructional correction and the body in training. Discourse Studies, 16(2), 247–269.
Hindmarsh, J., Reynolds, P., & Dunne, S. (2011). Exhibiting understanding: The body in apprenticeship. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 489–503.
Jones, R. L., Armour, K., & Potrac, P. (2002). Understanding the coaching process: A framework for social analysis. Quest, 54(1), 34–48.
Jones, R. L., Ronglan, L. T., Potrac, P., & Cushion, C. (2011). Concluding thoughts and ways forward. In R. L. Jones, P. Potrac, C. Cushion, & L. T. Ronglan (eds.), The sociology of sports coaching (pp. 179–186). Hoboken, NJ: Routledge.
Keevallik, L. (2010). Bodily quoting in dance correction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(4), 401–426.
Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P. (2011). Can you see the cystic artery yet? A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 521–541.
Lindwall, O., & Ekstrom, A. (2012). Instruction-in-interaction: The teaching and learning of a manual skill. Human Studies, 35(1), 27–49.
Lindwall, O., & Lymer, G. (2014). Inquiries of the body: Novice questions and the instructable observability of endodotic scenes. Discourse Studies, 16(2), 271–294.
Mondada, L. (2006). Video recording as the preservation of fundamental features for analysis. In H. Knoblauch, B. Schnettler, J. Raab, & H.-G. Soeffner (eds.), Video analysis: Methodology and methods (pp. 51–68). Bern: Peter Lang.
Mondada, L. (2007). Operating together through videoconference: Members’ procedures for accomplishing a common space of interaction. In S. Hester & D. Francis (eds.), Orders of ordinary action: Respecifying sociological knowledge (pp. 51–68). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Mondada, L. (2008). Using video for a sequential and multimodal analysis of social interaction: Videotaping institutional telephone calls. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3). Retrieved from [URL]
Nishizaka, A. (2006). What to learn: The embodied structure of the environment. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(2), 119–154.
Okada, M. (2013). Embodied interactional competence in boxing practice: Coparticipants’ joint accomplishment of a teaching and learning activity. Language & Communication, 33(4), 390–403.
Potrac, P., Brewer, C., Jones, R. L., Armour, K., & Hoff, J. (2000). Toward an holistic understanding of the coaching process. Quest, 61(2), 223–236.
Potrac, P., & Jones, R. L. (2009). Power, conflict, and cooperation: Towards a micropolitics of coaching. . Quest, 61(2), 223–236.
Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation, volumes I and II. G. Jefferson (ed), with introduction by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Sharrock, W. W., & Anderson, R. (1982). Talking and teaching: Reflective comments on in-classroom activities. In G. Payne & D. Hustler (eds.), Doing teaching (pp. 170–183). London: Batesford.
Sidnell, J. (2006). Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(4), 377–409.
Tutt, D., & Hindmarsh, J. (2011). Reenactments at work: Demonstrating conduct in data sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(3), 211–236.
Weeks, P. (1985). Error-correction techniques and sequences in instructional settings: Toward a comparative framework. Human Studies, 8(3), 195–223.
Weeks, P. (1996). A rehearsal of a Beethoven passage: An analysis of correction talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29(3), 247–290.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Fele, Giolo & Gian Marco Campagnolo
2024. Seeing bad luck: player participation to tactical video analysis in amateur football. Sports Coaching Review 13:1 ► pp. 60 ff.
Ehmer, Oliver & Geert Brône
2021. Instructing embodied knowledge: multimodal approaches to interactive practices for knowledge constitution. Linguistics Vanguard 7:s4
Evans, Bryn & Oskar Lindwall
2020. Show Them or Involve Them? Two Organizations of Embodied Instruction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:2 ► pp. 223 ff.
Brümmer, Kristina
2019. Spielsysteme, Matchpläne, Spielanalysen. Sport und Gesellschaft 16:3 ► pp. 266 ff.
Evans, Bryn & Richard Fitzgerald
2017. The categorial and sequential work of ‘embodied mapping’ in basketball coaching. Journal of Pragmatics 118 ► pp. 81 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.