Article published In:
Address from a World Perspective
Edited by Heinz L. Kretzenbacher, Catrin Norrby and Jane Warren
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29:2] 2006
► pp. 17.117.18
References (13)
Bayer, K. 1979. ‘Die Anredepronomina Du und Sie: Thesen zu einem semantischen Konflikt im Hochschulbereich’. Deutsche Sprache 7 (3): 212–219.Google Scholar
Clyne, M.G. 1995. The German language in a changing Europe. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, M.; Kretzenbacher, H.L.; Norrby, C.; Schüpbach, D. 2006. ‘Perceptions of variation and change in German and Swedish address’. Journal of sociolinguistics 10 (3): 283–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, M.; Kretzenbacher, H.L.; Schüpbach, D. 2004. ‘“Der größte Schritt, den man manchmal tun könnte”: Zur Anrede im Deutschen im internationalen Vergleich’. Sprachreport 41: 2–8.Google Scholar
Ehlers, K.-H. 2004. ‘Zur Anrede mit Titeln in Deutschland, Österreich und Tschechien. Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenerhebung’. Brücken. Germanistisches Jahrbuch Tschechien – Slowakei NF 121: 85–115.Google Scholar
Glück, H.; Sauer, W.W. 1997. Gegenwartsdeutsch. 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Metzler. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickey, R. 2003. ‘The German address system: Binary and scalar at once’. In Diachronic perspectives on address term systems, edited by Taavitsainen I.; Jucker A.H. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kallmeyer, W. 2003. ‘“Sagen Sie bitte du zu mir”: Werner Kallmeyer, Soziolinguist am Institut für Deutsche Sprache in Mannheim, über die Kunst der richtigen Anrede. Das Gespräch führte C. Schmitt’. Die Zeit 27. Accessed July 2, 2003. Available from: [URL].
Kretzenbacher, H.L. 1991. ‘Vom Sie zum Du – und retour?’ In Vom Sie zum Du – mehr als eine neue Konvention? Antworten auf die Preisfrage der Deutschen Akademie für Sprache und Dichtung vom Jahr 1989, edited by Kretzenbacher H.L.; Segebrecht W. Hamburg: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Noelle-Neumann, E.; Köcher, R. Eds. 1997. Allensbacher Jahrbuch der Demoskopie Band 10, 1993-1997. München: K. G. Saur/Allensbach: Verlag für Demoskopie.Google Scholar
Norrby, C. 2006. ‘Variation in Swedish address practices’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29 (2): 18.1–18.15. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Spross, E.M. 2001. ‘Das Du-Wort. Zur Anrede im Umgang mit anderen’. Unpublished PhD thesis. Graz, Austria: Karl-Franzens-Universität.Google Scholar
Warren, J. 2006. ‘Address pronouns in French: Variation within and outside the workplace’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29 (2): 16.1–16.17. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Cited by (18)

Cited by 18 other publications

Bączkowska, Anna
2022. Forms of Address in Polish Nonprofessional Subtitles. In Language Use, Education, and Professional Contexts [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],  pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
den Hartog, Maria, Marjolein van Hoften & Gert-Jan Schoenmakers
2022. Pronouns of address in recruitment advertisements from multinational companies. Linguistics in the Netherlands 39  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Kretzenbacher, Heinz L.
2022. Perceptions of national and regional standards of addressing in Germany and Austria. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Liebscher, Grit, Jennifer Dailey-O’Cain, Mareike Müller & Tetyana Reichert
2022. Negotiating identities through pronouns of address in an immigrant community. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 375 ff. DOI logo
Schüpbach, Doris, John Hajek, Heinz L. Kretzenbacher & Catrin Norrby
2021. Approaches to the study of address in pluricentric languages: methodological reflections . Sociolinguistica 35:1  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Kuepper, Marie-Christin & Anne Feryok
2020. Concept-based pragmatics instruction . Language and Sociocultural Theory 6:2  pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Cook, Manuela
2019. Chapter 1. N-V-T, a framework for the analysis of social dynamics in address pronouns. In The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 304],  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Blood, Rosalind
2018. “When you speak to a police officer and (call them)du”. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 3:1  pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Brosig-Koch, Jeannette & Timo Heinrich
2018. The role of communication content and reputation in the choice of transaction partners. Games and Economic Behavior 112  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Levshina, Natalia
2017. A Multivariate Study of T/V Forms in European Languages Based on a Parallel Corpus of Film Subtitles. Research in Language 15:2  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Wierzbicka, Anna
2015. A whole cloud of culture condensed into a drop of semantics. International Journal of Language and Culture 2:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wierzbicka, Anna
2016. Terms of Address in European Languages: A Study in Cross-Linguistic Semantics and Pragmatics. In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 9],  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Norrby, Catrin Elisabeth
2006. Variation in Swedish address practices. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29:2  pp. 18.1 ff. DOI logo
Norrby, Catrin Elisabeth
2006. Variation in Swedish address practices. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29:2  pp. 18.1 ff. DOI logo
Warren, Jane
2006. Address pronouns in French. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29:2  pp. 16.1 ff. DOI logo
Warren, Jane
2006. Address pronouns in French. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29:2  pp. 16.1 ff. DOI logo
Weissenböck, Maria
2006. Pronouns of address in western Ukrainian. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29:2  pp. 20.1 ff. DOI logo
Weissenböck, Maria
2006. Pronouns of address in western Ukrainian. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29:2  pp. 20.1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.