Article published In:
Address from a World PerspectiveEdited by Heinz L. Kretzenbacher, Catrin Norrby and Jane Warren
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29:2] 2006
► pp. 17.1–17.18
Edited by Heinz L. Kretzenbacher, Catrin Norrby and Jane Warren
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29:2] 2006
► pp. 17.1–17.18
Pronominal address in German
Rules, anarchy and embarrassment potential
Choice of address forms, a socially crucial feature in German communication, is context-dependent on situations (a) where the unmarked form of address is du (T), (b) where it is Sie (V), and (c) where the two systems (a and b) coexist. The first two situations are, apart from their fuzzy edges, rather clearcut. The third situation, however, appears anarchic and has a high embarrassment potential. In an empirical study based on 72 interviews conducted in three regions of the German speaking area, the three prototypical situations are explored. A number of potentially conflicting rules and preferences for ambiguity are isolated. These include individual preferences, network preferences and perceptions of social distance, based on factors such as relative age, emotional closeness of interlocutors, and perceived commonalities between them. In spite of the complex interplay of competing rules and preferences and the consequent embarrassment potential, German speakers appear to reject any imposition from outside of a particular address form. This study is part of a larger, Australian-based project comparing the address systems of French, German and Swedish.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References (13)
Bayer, K. 1979. ‘Die Anredepronomina Du und Sie: Thesen zu einem semantischen Konflikt im Hochschulbereich’. Deutsche Sprache 7 (3): 212–219.
Clyne, M.G. 1995. The German language in a changing Europe. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. 
Clyne, M.; Kretzenbacher, H.L.; Norrby, C.; Schüpbach, D. 2006. ‘Perceptions of variation and change in German and Swedish address’. Journal of sociolinguistics 10 (3): 283–315.
Clyne, M.; Kretzenbacher, H.L.; Schüpbach, D. 2004. ‘“Der größte Schritt, den man manchmal tun könnte”: Zur Anrede im Deutschen im internationalen Vergleich’. Sprachreport 41: 2–8.
Ehlers, K.-H. 2004. ‘Zur Anrede mit Titeln in Deutschland, Österreich und Tschechien. Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenerhebung’. Brücken. Germanistisches Jahrbuch Tschechien – Slowakei NF 121: 85–115.
Glück, H.; Sauer, W.W. 1997. Gegenwartsdeutsch. 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Metzler.
Hickey, R. 2003. ‘The German address system: Binary and scalar at once’. In Diachronic perspectives on address term systems, edited by Taavitsainen I.; Jucker A.H. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kallmeyer, W. 2003. ‘“Sagen Sie bitte du zu mir”: Werner Kallmeyer, Soziolinguist am Institut für Deutsche Sprache in Mannheim, über die Kunst der richtigen Anrede. Das Gespräch führte C. Schmitt’. Die Zeit 27. Accessed July 2, 2003. Available from: [URL].
Kretzenbacher, H.L. 1991. ‘Vom Sie zum Du – und retour?’ In Vom Sie zum Du – mehr als eine neue Konvention? Antworten auf die Preisfrage der Deutschen Akademie für Sprache und Dichtung vom Jahr 1989, edited by Kretzenbacher H.L.; Segebrecht W. Hamburg: Luchterhand.
Noelle-Neumann, E.; Köcher, R. Eds. 1997. Allensbacher Jahrbuch der Demoskopie Band 10, 1993-1997. München: K. G. Saur/Allensbach: Verlag für Demoskopie.
Norrby, C. 2006. ‘Variation in Swedish address practices’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29 (2): 18.1–18.15. .
.Spross, E.M. 2001. ‘Das Du-Wort. Zur Anrede im Umgang mit anderen’. Unpublished PhD thesis. Graz, Austria: Karl-Franzens-Universität.
Warren, J. 2006. ‘Address pronouns in French: Variation within and outside the workplace’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29 (2): 16.1–16.17. .
.Cited by (18)
Cited by 18 other publications
Bączkowska, Anna
2022. Forms of Address in Polish Nonprofessional Subtitles. In Language Use, Education, and Professional Contexts [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 71 ff. 
den Hartog, Maria, Marjolein van Hoften & Gert-Jan Schoenmakers
2022. Pronouns of address in recruitment advertisements from multinational companies. Linguistics in the Netherlands 39 ► pp. 39 ff.
Kretzenbacher, Heinz L.
2022. Perceptions of national and regional standards of addressing in Germany and Austria. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 69 ff.
Liebscher, Grit, Jennifer Dailey-O’Cain, Mareike Müller & Tetyana Reichert
2022. Negotiating identities through pronouns of address in an immigrant community. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 375 ff.
Schüpbach, Doris, John Hajek, Heinz L. Kretzenbacher & Catrin Norrby
2021. Approaches to the study of address in pluricentric languages: methodological reflections
. Sociolinguistica 35:1 ► pp. 165 ff.
Kuepper, Marie-Christin & Anne Feryok
2020. Concept-based pragmatics instruction . Language and Sociocultural Theory 6:2 ► pp. 158 ff.
Cook, Manuela
2019. Chapter 1. N-V-T, a framework for the analysis of social dynamics in address pronouns. In The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 304], ► pp. 17 ff.
Blood, Rosalind
2018. “When you speak to a police officer and (call them)du”. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 3:1 ► pp. 117 ff.
Brosig-Koch, Jeannette & Timo Heinrich
2018. The role of communication content and reputation in the choice of transaction partners. Games and Economic Behavior 112 ► pp. 49 ff.
Levshina, Natalia
2017. A Multivariate Study of T/V Forms in European Languages Based on a Parallel Corpus of Film Subtitles. Research in Language 15:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
Wierzbicka, Anna
2015. A whole cloud of culture condensed into a drop of semantics. International Journal of Language and Culture 2:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Wierzbicka, Anna
2016. Terms of Address in European Languages: A Study in Cross-Linguistic Semantics and Pragmatics. In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 9], ► pp. 209 ff.
Norrby, Catrin Elisabeth
2006. Variation in Swedish address practices. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 18.1 ff.
Norrby, Catrin Elisabeth
2006. Variation in Swedish address practices. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 18.1 ff.
Warren, Jane
2006. Address pronouns in French. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 16.1 ff.
Warren, Jane
Weissenböck, Maria
2006. Pronouns of address in western Ukrainian. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 20.1 ff.
Weissenböck, Maria
2006. Pronouns of address in western Ukrainian. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 20.1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.