Cover not available
Article published In:
Babel
Vol. 65:1 (2019) ► pp.51–60

Translation and political engagement

The role of Ali Shariati’s translations in Islamic Marxists movements in Iran in the 1970s

 | Islamic Azad University
The activist aspect of translation that has illocutionary and perlocutionary dimensions is a sort of speech act that rouses, inspires, bears witness, mobilizes and incites to rebellion, actually participating in social movement and political change. In this way, translators are the producers of new knowledge signifying the assertion of power by choosing deliberately to subvert the traditional allegiance of translation and also interjecting their own world view and politics into their work, and these translators undertake the work they do because they believe the texts they produce will benefit humanity or impact positively upon the receptor culture in ways that are broadly ideological. This paper investigates the issue of an Islamic Marxist translators’ agency applying Pierre Bourdieu’s sociological concepts (habitus, field, capital) in the socio-political context of Iran in the 1960s and 1970s. This study surveys how based on his habitus Ali Shariati, an Islamic Marxist translator and thinker, translated some texts to transfer new knowledge to society as cultural capital which intensified the initiation and facilitation of social reform and political change in Iran in the 1970s. The paper peruses some texts translated by Ali Shariati to show that he wielded his own politics in translation to illuminate Iranians’ thought against the imperial regime to stimulate them to subvert the Pahlavi dynasty.
Keywords: translation, engagement, Ali Shariati, Islamic Marxists, Pierre Bourdieu’s concepts
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Translation and Shariati’s habitus
  • 3.Shariati and field of translation
  • 4.Shariati’s translations and cultural capital
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 26 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00073.ghe
References (28)
References
Abrahamian, E. 1983. Iran between Two Revolution. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
2011: 1390 A.H.. A History of Modern Iran. Transl. by Partovi, M. Tehran: Ney.Google Scholar
Alvaerz, R.; and Vidal, A. C. 1996. Translation, Power, Subversion. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bassnett, S. and Lefevere, A. 2000. Constructing Cultures. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bassnett, S. 2002. Translation Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Behrouz, M. 2002: 1381 A.H.. Rebel with a cause The Failure of the Left in Iran. Tehran: Ghoghnous.Google Scholar
Boroujerdi, M.. 2008: 1387 A.H.. Iranian Intellectuals and the West. Transl. by Shirzadi, J.. Tehran: Farzanrooz.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1988. “The Forms of Capital”. In Handbook of Theory and Research for Sociology of Education, ed. by J. G. Richardson, 246–258. New York: Green Wood Press.Google Scholar
1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cronin, M. 2006. Translation and Identity. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Transl. by A. Sheridan. New York: Vintagebook.Google Scholar
1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. London: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
1998. The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gaventa, J. 2003. Power After Lukes: A review of the Literature. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Gentzler, E. 1993. Contemporary Translation Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1996. “Translation, Counter-Culture, and The Fifties in the USA”. In Translation, Power, Subversion, ed. by R. Alvarez; and C. A. Vidal, 116–137. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
2002. “Translation, Post Structuralism and Power”. In Translation and Power, ed. by M. Tymoczko; and E. Gentzler, 195–218. Amherst and Boston (MA): University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Mirsepasi, A. 2010: 1389 A.H. Negotiating Modernity in Iran, Intellectual Discourse and the Politics of Modernization. Transl. by Tavakolian, J. Tehran: Tarheno.Google Scholar
Nabavi, N. 2009: 1388 A.H.. Intellectuals and the State in Iran: Politics, Discourse, and the Dilemma of Authenhicity. Transl. by Fesharaki, H. Tehran: Shirazeh.Google Scholar
Navarro, Z. 2006. “In Search of Cultural Interpretation of Power”. IDS Bulletin 37 (6): 11–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rainbow, P. 1991. The Foucault Reader: An Introduction to Foucault’s Thought. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Tymoczko, M. 2000. “Translation and Poltical Engagement: Activism, Social Change and The Role of Translation in Geopolitical Shifts”. The Translator 6 (1): 23–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tymoczko, M. and Gentzler, E. 2002. Translation and Power. Amherst and Boston (MA): The University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Tymoczko, M. 2003. “Translation, Ideology and Creativity”. Linguistica Antverpiensia Vol.21: 7–45.Google Scholar
2007. Enlarging Translation, Empowering Translators. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Venuti, L. 1992. Rethinking Translation; Discourse, Subjectivity, Ideology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2000. Translation Studies Reader. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.; and Chesterman, A. 2002. The Map: A Beginner’s Guide to Doing Research in Translation Studies. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Wang, Xiaorui
2022. The translator as an activist: the case of Yan Fu as a pioneer activist translator in the late Qing. Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies 9:2 ► pp. 170 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Xiaorui
2023. Activism in translation: Yan Fu’s translational activism against foreign imperialism in late Qing China. Meta 68:1 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.