Cover not available
Article published In:
Babel
Vol. 67:4 (2021) ► pp.460–481

Investigating translation trainees’ self-perceived competence

A process-oriented, collaborative seminar on translation and translation revision

 | University of Salerno
 | University of Ferrara
Pushed by the increasing internationalization of education and recent economic dynamics, training programs are shifting their focus to acquiring competences and know-how through real-life materials to enhance learners’ employability and access to the work market. Moreover, recent research has called for the implementation of editing/revision content in translation programs, overcoming the assumed distance between translation and editing/revision professions. In light of social constructivism and process-oriented pedagogical trends in translation training, an intensive twenty-hour seminar was designed and piloted in a Master’s degree program in Specialized Translation with the intent of increasing students’ awareness of the translation process, including translation revision and their sense of perceived competence. Rasch analysis of pre- and post-test questionnaires detected positive changes in students’ self-perceived proficiency in translation, translation revision, and editing, with critical implications for the usefulness of process-oriented, realistic approaches integrating both translation and editing/revision content in translation training programs.
Keywords: curricular development, curricular design in translation, editing, perceived competence, translation revision, translation training
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Shifts in translator training approaches
  • Foregrounding translation revision
  • The Awareness in Editing and Translation seminar
  • Materials and method
    • Participants
    • Instruments
    • Statistical model
    • Reliability statistics
  • Results and discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 8 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00232.lat
References (40)
References
Angelone, Erik. 2010. “Uncertainty, Uncertainty Management and Metacognitive Problem Solving in the Translation Task.” In Translation and Cognition, edited by Gregory M. Shreve and Erik Angelone, 17–40. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mona, and Carol Maier. 2011. “Ethics in Interpreter and Translator Training.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 5 (1): 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biel, Lucja. 2011. “Training Translators or Translation Service Providers? EN 15038: 2006 Standard of Translation Services and Its Training Implications.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 161: 61–76.Google Scholar
Bisiada, Mario. 2018. “Translation and Editing: A Study of Editorial Treatment of Nominalisations in Draft Translations.” Perspectives 26 (1): 24–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breedveld, Hella. 2002. “Writing and Revising Processes in Professional Translation.” Across Languages and Cultures 3 (1): 91–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casas-Tost, Helena, and Sara Rovira-Esteva. 2008. “Chinese-Spanish Translation Studies in Tertiary Institutions in Spain: Historical Review and Future Perspectives.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 2 (2): 185–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Almeida, Giselle, and Sharon O’Brien. 2010. “Analyzing Post-Editing Performance: Correlations with Years of Translation Experience.” Proceedings of 14th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, Saint-Raphaël, 27–28 May.Google Scholar
Duffy, Thomas M., and David H. Jonassen. 1991. “Constructivism: New Implications for Instructional Technology?” Educational Technology 31 (5): 7–12.Google Scholar
Dunlosky, John, and Katherine A. Rawson. 2012. “Overconfidence Produces Underachievement: Inaccurate Self Evaluations Undermine Students’ Learning and Retention.” Learning and Instruction 22 (4): 271–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elliot, Andrew J., and Carol S. Dweck. 2005. “Competence and Motivation: Competence as the Core of Achievement Motivation.” In Handbook of Competence and Motivation, edited by Andrew J. Elliot and Carol S. Dweck, 3–12. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
European Committee for Standardization. 2006. European Standard EN 15038. Translation Services – Service Requirements. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.Google Scholar
Gile, Daniel. 2009. Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training, rev. ed. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiraly, Donald. 2014. A Social Constructivist Approach to Translator Education. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruger, Haidee. 2007. “Training Text Editors as Part of a General Programme in Language Practice: A Process-Oriented Approach.” Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 25 (1): 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Künzli, Alexander. 2006. “Teaching and Learning Translation Revision: Some Suggestions Based on Evidence from a Think-Aloud Protocol Study.” In Current Trends in Translation Teaching and Learning, edited by Mike Garant, 7–21. Helsinki: Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Li, Dechao. 2011. “Think-Aloud Teaching in Translation Class: Implications from TAPs Translation Research.” Perspectives 19 (2): 109–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linacre, John M. 2006. Winsteps (Version 3.63) [Computer software]. Chicago: Winsteps.com.Google Scholar
2007. “How to Simulate Rasch Data.” Rasch Measurement Transactions 21 (3): e1125.Google Scholar
Lörscher, Wolfgang. 1992. “Investigating the Translation Process.” Meta: Journal des traducteurs / Meta: Translators’ Journal 37 (3): 426–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maia, Belinda, Johann Haller, and Margherita Ulrych, eds. 2002. Training the Language Services Provider for the New Millennium. Porto: Universidade do Porto.Google Scholar
Massof, Robert W., and Donald C. Fletcher. 2001. “Evaluation of the NEI Visual Functioning Questionnaire as an Interval Measure of Visual Ability in Low Vision.” Vision Research 41 (3): 397–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meister, Lova. 2017. “Threshold Concepts and Ways of Thinking and Practising: The Potential of a Framework for Understanding in Translation Didactics.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 11 (1): 20–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mossop, Brian. 2007. “Empirical Studies of Revision: What We Know and Need to Know.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 81: 5–20.Google Scholar
. 2014. Revising and Editing for Translators, 3rd ed. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Núñez, Juan L., and Alicia Bolaños-Medina. 2018. “Predictors of Problem-Solving in Translation: Implications for Translator Training.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 12 (3): 282–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olvera-Lobo, María Dolores, et al.. 2009. “Teleworking and Collaborative Work Environments in Translation Training.” Babel 55 (2): 165–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olvera-Lobo, María Dolores, et al.. 2007. “A Professional Approach to Translator Training (PATT).” Meta: Journal des traducteurs / Meta: Translators’ Journal 52 (3): 517–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
PACTE. 2003. “Building a Translation Competence Model.” In Triangulating Translation: Perspectives in Process Oriented Research, edited by Fabio Alves, 43–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesudovs, Konrad, Estibaliz Garamendi, and David B. Elliott. 2004. “The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) Questionnaire: Development and Validation.” Optometry and Vision Science 81 (10): 769–777. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rasch, Georg. 1993. Probabilistic Models for some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Chicago: MESA.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Kirsten Wølch, and Anne Schjoldager. 2011. “Revising Translations: A Survey of Revision Policies in Danish Translation Companies.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 151: 87–120.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Matthew G., and Sarah K. Tauber. 2011. “The Influence of Delaying Judgments of Learning on Metacognitive Accuracy: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Psychological Bulletin 137 (1): 131–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robert, Isabelle. 2008. “Translation Revision Procedures: An Explorative Study.” In Translation and Its Others. Selected Papers of the CETRA Research Seminar in Translation Studies 2007, edited by Pieter Boulogne, 91–116. Leuven: KU Leuven.Google Scholar
Robert, Isabelle, and Louise Brunette. 2016. “Should Revision Trainees Think Aloud while Revising Somebody Else’s Translation? Insights from an Empirical Study with Professionals.” Meta: Journal des traducteurs/Meta: Translators’ Journal 61 (2): 320–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robert, Isabelle S., Aline Remael, and Jim J. J. Ureel. 2017. “Towards a Model of Translation Revision Competence.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 11 (1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robin, Edina. 2016. “The Translator as Reviser.” In The Modern Translator and Interpreter, edited by Ildikó Horváth, 341–346. Budapest: Eötvös University Press.Google Scholar
Schnell, Bettina, and Nadia Rodríguez. 2017. “Ivory Tower vs. Workplace Reality.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 11 (2–3): 160–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Edward, and Everett Smith. 2007. “Instrument Development Tools and Activities for Measure Validation Using Rasch Models: Part I – Instrument Development Tools.” Journal of Applied Measurement 8 (1): 97–123.Google Scholar
Wright, Benjamin D., and Geoff Masters. 2006. “Number of Person or Item Strata: (4*Separation + 1)/3.” Rasch Measurement Transactions 16 (3): e888.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Tekwa, Kizito
2024. Process-oriented collaborative translation within the training environment: comparing team and individual trainee performances using a video-ethnography approach. Education and Information Technologies 29:5 ► pp. 6443 ff. DOI logo
Peng, Wenqing, Mu Hu & Peng Bi
2023. Investigating Blended Learning Mode in Translation Competence Development. Sage Open 13:4 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.