Cover not available
Article published In:
Babel
Vol. 61:2 (2015) ► pp.219–241

Audience Attitude and Translation Reception

The case of Genji Monogatari

This article proposes a skopos-based analysis of the English translations of the eleventh century Japanese literary work, Genji monogatari (“The Tale of Genji”) as a means of understanding the basis for the translations’ differing receptions among their target audiences. The translations, by Suematsu Kenchō, Arthur Waley, Edward Seidensticker and Royall Tyler, are widely spaced chronologically, being published between 1888–2001, and were each produced with differing audiences and aims, thus making them a useful corpus for this analysis. In addition, all of the translators have written, with varying degrees of explicitness, about their motivations and purposes in conducting their translations. First, through an analysis of the translators’ writings, introductions, and individual circumstances, the article will demonstrate how the skopos for each translation can be determined. Second, through an analysis and comparison of text excerpts, it will demonstrate how the skopos influenced the translation choices of the individual translators, with material being, for example, omitted, changed in psychological tone, or rendered more explicit, depending upon the individual translator’s overriding purpose in their work. Finally, through an analysis of the reviews of the various translations, it will consider the extent to which each translator was successful in achieving a positive and intended response to his translation in the target audience.
Keywords: audience, skopos, reception, Genji monogatari, Japanese
Published online: 29 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.61.2.04mac
References (68)
Aaltonen, Sirkku. 2003. “Retranslation in the Finnish Theatre.” Caderno de Tradução 111: 141–159.Google Scholar
Berman, Antoine. 1990. “La retraduction comme espace de la traduction.” Palimpsestes 41: 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowring, Richard. 1982. Murasaki Shikibu: Her Diary and Poetic Memoirs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
. 1988. Murasaki Shikibu The Tale of Genji, Landmarks of World Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Siobhan. 2006. “Narrative Theory and Retranslation Theory.” Across Languages and Cultures 7 (2):145–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew. 2000. “A Causal Model for Translation Studies.” In Intercultural Faultlines, ed. by Maeve Olohan, 15–27. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Hypotheses about Translation Universals.” In Claims, Changes and Challenges in Translation Studies, ed. by Gyde Hansen, Kirsten Malmkjaer, and Daniel Gile, 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Gruchy, John Walter. 2003. Orienting Arthur Waley Japonism, Orientalism and the Creation of Japanese Literature in English. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Deane, Sharon L. 2011. Confronting the Retranslation Hypothesis: Flaubert and Sand in the British Literary System, University of Edinburgh.
Gambier, Yves. 1994. “La Retraduction, Retour et Détour.” Meta: Translator’s Journal 39 (3): 413–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gürçağlar, Şehnaz Tahir. 2009. “Retranslation.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, ed. by Mona Baker and Gabriela Saldanha, 233–236. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gutt, Ernst-August. 1996. “Implicit Information in Literary Translation A Relevance-Theoretic Perspective.” Target 8 (2): 239–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa Masaharu, Itō Hiroshi, Imanishi Yuichirō, and Yoshioka Hiroshi. 1989. Tosa Nikki, Kagerō Nikki, Murasaki Shikibu Nikki, Sarashina Nikki, Shin Nihon Koten Bungaku Taikei. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko. 2011. The Routledge Course in Japanese Translation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hatim, Basil. 1999. “Implications of Research into Translator Invisibility.” Target 11 (2): 201–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermans, Theo. 1996. “The Translator’s Voice in Translated Narrative.” Target 8 (1): 23–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane. 1997. Translation Quality Assessment: A Model Revisited. Turbingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Imaizumi Tadayoshi, Mori Shōichi, and Wokazaki Masatsugu. 1976. Genji Monogatari. Tokyo: Ōfusha.Google Scholar
Jenn, Ronald. 2006. “From American Frontier to European Borders.” Book History 91: 235–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamens, Edward. 2003. ““A Beautiful, Quiet World”? The Tale of Genji and its English Translations.” Journal of Japanese Studies 29 (2): 325–339.Google Scholar
Keene, Donald. 1970. “In Your Distant Street Few Drums Were Heard.” In Madly Singing in the Mountains: An Appreciation and Anthology of Arthur Waley, ed. by Ivan Morris, 52–62. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Martin de Leon, Celia. 2008. “Skopos and Beyond A Critical Study of Functionalism.” Target 20 (1): 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Senko K. 1998. Principles of Japanese Discourse: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo
McCullough, Helen. 1977. “Review: The Seidensticker Genji.” Monumenta Nipponica 32 (1): 93–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Genji and Heike Selections from The Tale of Genji and The Tale of the Heike. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mehl, Margaret. 1993. “Suematsu Kenchō in Britain, 1878–1886.” Japan Forum 5 (2): 173–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Midorikawa, Machiko. 2003. “Coming to Terms with the Alien – Translations of ‘Genji Monogatari’.” Monumenta Nipponica 58 (2): 193–222.Google Scholar
Miller, Roy Andrew. 1986. Nihongo: In Defense of Japanese. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Miner, Earl, Hiroko Odagiri, and Robert E. Morrell. 1985. The Princeton Companion to Classical Japanese Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Ivan. 1964. The World of the Shining Prince: Court Life in Ancient Japan. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
. 1970. “The Genius of Arthur Waley.” In Madly Singing in the Mountains: An Appreciation and Anthology of Arthur Waley, ed. by Ivan Morris, 67–87. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
. 1975. As I Crossed a Bridge of Dreams. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene A. 1964. Toward a Science of Translating. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene A., and Charles Russell Taber. 1969. The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Niimura, Janice P. 2001. Courtly Lust. The New York Times, [[URL] ].Google Scholar
Nord, Christiane. 1991. “Scopos, Loyalty, and Translational Conventions.” Target 3 (1): 91–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Translating as a Purposeful Activity. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Paloposki, Outi, and Kaisa Koskinen. 2004. “A Thousand and One Translations: Revisiting Translations.” In Claims, Changes and Challenges in Translation Studies: Selected Contributions from the EST Congress, Copenhagen 2001, ed. by Daniel Gile, Gyde Hansen, and Kirsten Malmkjaer, 27–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puette, William J. 1983. The Tale of Genji A Reader’s Guide. Tokyo: Charles E. Tuttle Company.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony. 2004. “Propositions on Cross-cultural Communication and Translation.” Target 16 (1): 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Refsing, Kirsten, and Lita Lundquist. 2009. Translating Japanese Texts. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Reiss, Katharina. 2000. Translation Criticism – The Potentials and Limitations. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Risku, Hanna. 2002. “Situatedness in Translation Studies.” Cognitive Systems Research 3 (3): 523–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidensticker, Edward. 1980. “Chiefly on Translating the Genji.” Journal of Japanese Studies 6 (1): 15–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidensticker, Edward G. 1981. The Tale of Genji. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
. 1983. Genji Days. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
Smiley, Jane. 2006. “Consuming Narratives.” The Guardian, [[URL] ]Google Scholar
St. André, James. 2003. “Retranslation as Argument: Canon Formation, Professionalization, and International Rivalry in 19th Century Sinological Translation.” Caderno de Tradução 111: 59–93.Google Scholar
Suematsu, Kenchō. 1974. Genji Monogatari. Tokyo: Tuttle.Google Scholar
Susam-Sarajeva, Şebnem. 2003. “Multiple Entry Visa to Travelling Theory: Retranslations of Literary and Cultural Theories.” Target 15 (1): 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Tomi. 2008. “The Tale of Genji, National Literature, Language, and Modernism.” In Envisioning the Tale of Genji: Media, Gender and Cultural Production, ed. by Haruo Shirane, 243–287. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Yōhei. 2013. Hentai Ōji to Warawanai Neko. Japan.Google Scholar
Tyler, Royall. 1996. “Lady Murasaki’s Erotic Entertainment: The Early Chapters of The Tale of Genji.” East Asian History 121: 65–78.Google Scholar
. 1999. ““I Am I”: Genji and Murasaki.” Monumenta Nipponica 54 (4): 435–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. The Tale of Genji. Harmondsworth: Viking.Google Scholar
. 2003a. “Rivalry, Triumph, Folly, Revenge: A Plot Line through The Tale of Genji.” Journal of Japanese Studies 29 (2): 251–287.Google Scholar
. 2003b. Translating The Tale of Genji. (20 June 2013), [[URL] ]Google Scholar
. 2009. “The Disaster of the Third Princess: Essays on the Tale of Genji.” Canberra: ANU E Press. [[URL] ]Google Scholar
Ury, Marian. 1976. “The Imaginary Kingdom and the Translator’s Art: Notes on Re-Reading Waley’s Genji.” Journal of Japanese Studies 2 (2): 267–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1977. “Review: The Complete Genji.” Review of The Tale of Genji by Shikibu, Murasaki; Seidensticker, Edward G. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 37 (1): 183–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence. 1995. The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. The Scandals of Translation: Towards an Ethics of Difference. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Retranslations: The Creation of Value.” Bucknell Review 47 (1): 25–38.Google Scholar
Vovin, Alexander. 2003. A Reference Grammar of Classical Japanese Prose. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Waley, Arthur. 1935. The Tale of Genji. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. 1966. “The Tale of Genji.” In Collected Essays, ed. by Virginia Woolf, 264–268. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Hu, Bei
2023. Flowing to the reception side. In Translation Flows [Benjamins Translation Library, 163], ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Jazini, Alireza
2021. Translation policy. Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 7:3 ► pp. 339 ff. DOI logo
Božović, Petar
2019. How should culture be rendered in subtitling and dubbing?. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 65:1 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.