Argumentation and Health
Editors
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the role of argumentation in the health care domain. Argumentation and Health is a collection of essays by argumentation theorists reflecting on the way in which the institutional context of health care shapes the argumentative interaction. The volume provides for the first time an overview of the most important recent developments and achievements of the study of argumentation in medical and public oriented health communication. In Argumentation and Health , attention is paid to argumentation in different forms of health communication, such as the medical consultation, direct-to-consumer drug advertising, health brochures and health risk communication.
This book is of interest to argumentation theorists, (health) communication scholars, healthcare practitioners, students of medicine and health-related fields, and all other researchers and practitioners interested in the function and characteristics of argumentation in health communication. Originally published in Journal of Argumentation in Context, Vol. 1:1 (2012).
This book is of interest to argumentation theorists, (health) communication scholars, healthcare practitioners, students of medicine and health-related fields, and all other researchers and practitioners interested in the function and characteristics of argumentation in health communication. Originally published in Journal of Argumentation in Context, Vol. 1:1 (2012).
[Benjamins Current Topics, 64] 2014. vi, 147 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 7 July 2014
Published online on 7 July 2014
© John Benjamins
Table of Contents
-
Introduction
-
Argumentation in the healthcare domainSara Rubinelli and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans | pp. 1–4
-
Argumentation and informed consent in the doctor–patient relationshipJerome Bickenbach | pp. 5–18
-
Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering in shared medical decision-makingFrancisca Snoeck Henkemans and Dima Mohammed | pp. 19–32
-
Reasonableness of a doctor’s argument by authority: A pragma-dialectical analysis of the specific soundness conditionsRoosmaryn Pilgram | pp. 33–50
-
Evaluating argumentative moves in medical consultationsSarah Bigi | pp. 51–65
-
Teaching argumentation theory to doctors: Why and whatSara Rubinelli and Claudia Zanini | pp. 66–80
-
Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity typeRenske Wierda and Jacky Visser | pp. 81–96
-
The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochuresLotte van Poppel | pp. 97–112
-
Argumentation and risk communication about genetic testing: Challenges for healthcare consumers and implications for computer systemsNancy L. Green | pp. 113–129
-
“It is about our body, our own body!”: On the difficulty of telling Dutch women under 50 that mammography is not for themPeter J. Schulz and Bert Meuffels | pp. 130–142
-
Index | pp. 143–144
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Jackson, Sally
Akkermans, Aranka, Sanne Prins, Amber S. Spijkers, Jean Wagemans, Nanon H. M. Labrie, Dick L. Willems, Marcus J. Schultz, Thomas G. V. Cherpanath, Job B. M. van Woensel, Marc van Heerde, Anton H. van Kaam, Moniek van de Loo, Anne Stiggelbout, Ellen M. A. Smets & Mirjam A. de Vos
Mitchell, Gordon R.
2023. Covid-19 and public debate over gain-of-function research on
potentially pandemic pathogens. Journal of Argumentation in Context 12:3 ► pp. 307 ff.
ZHU, Lei & Wei WANG
Rubinelli, Sara, Maddalena Fiordelli, Claudia Zanini & Nicola Diviani
Хоменко, Ірина
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Communication Studies
Main BIC Subject
CFG: Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General