Cover not available
Part of
Child Bilingualism and Second Language Learning: Multidisciplinary perspectives
Edited by Fangfang Li, Karen E. Pollock and Robbin Gibb
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 10] 2020
► pp. 137–166

Chapter 8
Current developments in bilingual primary education in the Netherlands

 | Utrecht University
 | Utrecht University
This contribution addresses two studies of the processes and outcomes of English as a foreign language (EFL) in Dutch primary education. Firstly, this article describes a preliminary study of the learning outcomes at the end of primary education, comparing pupils’ language proficiency after either two years or six to eight years of low-intensity EFL programs. Secondly, it describes the outcomes of a subsequent classroom observation study in a high-intensity bilingual primary education pilot in grade 1, focusing on teacher language use and teacher-pupil interaction. Results are related to learning outcome in terms of pupils’ receptive vocabulary knowledge. Conclusions focus on foreign language teaching in primary education in general, and bilingual primary education in particular.
Article outline
  • Introduction
    • Content and language integrated learning
    • Bilingual primary education in the Netherlands
    • Factors influencing second language learning
    • The role of linguistic input on vocabulary development
    • The present studies
  • Study 1
    • Method
      • Participants
      • Instruments
      • Procedure
    • Results
      • Written test results
      • Oral proficiency test results
    • Discussion Study 1
  • Study 2
    • Method
      • Participants
        • Teachers
        • Pupils
      • Materials and procedure
        • The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test
        • Classroom observations
        • Transcription procedure
      • Data analysis
        • Linguistic analyses
        • Amount of talk
        • Lexical diversity
        • Lexical sophistication
        • Syntactic complexity
    • Statistical analyses
      • Results
    • The relation between teachers’ input and children’s vocabulary
    • Word-level model
    • Utterance-level model
      • Discussion Study 2
  • General discussion and conclusion
    • Limitations and future research
    • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.10.08gra
References (54)
References
Ascentis Anglia. (2009). Handbook for teachers; Full examination syllabus and specifications. Lancaster: Ascentis.Google Scholar
Aukrust, V. G., & Rydland, V. (2011). Preschool classroom conversations as long-term resources for second language and literacy acquisition. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(4), 198–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowers, E. P., & Vasilyeva, M. (2011). The relation between teacher input and lexical growth of preschoolers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(1), 221–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. London: George Allen & Unwin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cantone, K. F. (2007). Code-switching in bilingual children. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Cenoz, J. (2013). Discussion: Towards an educational perspective in CLIL language policy and pedagogical practice. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 389–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chall, J. S., & Dale, E. (1995). Readability revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability formula. Boston, MA: Brookline Books.Google Scholar
Cook, V. (2016). Second language learning and language teaching (5th ed.). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costache, O. (2017). English language use in bilingual primary schools: The relation between teacher input and children’s vocabulary knowledge (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Utrecht University. Retrieved from <[URL]> (11 June, 2020).
Council of Europe. (2001). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from <[URL]> (11 June, 2020).
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T. & Smit, U. (Eds.). (2010). Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Graaff, R. (2015). Vroeg of laat Engels in het basisonderwijs; Wat levert het op? [Early or late English in primary education; What is the impact?]. Levende Talen Tijdschrift, 16(2), 3–15.Google Scholar
De Houwer, A. (2007). Parental language input patterns and children’s bilingual use. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(3), 411–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, D. K., & Porche, M. V. (2011). Relation between language experiences in preschool classrooms and children’s kindergarten and fourth-grade language and reading abilities. Child Development, 82(3), 870–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Driessen, G., Krikhaar, E., De Graaff, R., Unsworth, S., Leest, B., Coppens, K., & Wierenga, J. (2016). Evaluation pilot bilingual primary education. Nijmegen: ITS, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Dunn, L., & Dunn, D. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4th ed.). Bloomington, MI: NCS Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2004). Individual differences in second language learning. In The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 525–51). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enever, J. (2011). ELLiE. Early language learning in Europe. London: British Council.Google Scholar
EP-Nuffic. 2017. Streefwoordenlijst Engels voor groep 1 en 2 uit het tweetalig primair onderwijs (TPO) [English Target word list for Kindergarten in Bilingual primary education]. Den Haag, the Netherlands: Nuffic.Google Scholar
Gámez, P. B. (2015). Classroom-based English exposure and English language learners’ expressive language skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 31, 135–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gámez, P. B., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012). The relation between exposure to sophisticated and complex language and early-adolescent English-only and language minority learners’ vocabulary. Child Development, 83(4), 1316–1331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gámez, P. B., Neugebauer, S. R., Coyne, M. D., McCoach, D. B., & Ware, S. (2017). Linguistic and social cues for vocabulary learning in dual language learners and their English-only peers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 40, 25–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelman, A., Carlin, J., Stern, H., Dunson, D., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. (2013). Bayesian Data Analysis (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F., & Lindholm-Leary, K. (2013). Two case studies of content-based language education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geurts, B., & Hemker, B. (2013). Balans van het Engels aan het eind van de basisschool 4; uitkomsten van de vierde peiling in 2012 [English at the end of primary education 4; outcomes of the fourth census in 2012]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: Cito.Google Scholar
Geurts, B., de Graaff, R., & Hemker, B. (2014). Engels in het basisonderwijs: Opbrengsten Eibo en vvto [English in primary education: Outcomes of early and late English programs]. In A. Corda, K. Philipsen & R. de Graaff (Eds.), Handboek vroeg vreemdetalenonderwijs: Engels op de basisschool (pp. 121–137). Bussum, the Netherlands: Coutinho.Google Scholar
Guiraud, P. (1960). Problèmes et méthodes de la statistique linguistique [Problems and methods of statistical linguistics]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 45(3), 337–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hüttner, J., & Rieder-Bünemann, A. (2007). The effects of CLIL instruction on children’s narrative competence. Vienna English Working Papers, 15(3), 41–46.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, H. (1948). Theory of Probability. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Justice, L. M., McGinty, A. S., Zucker, T., Cabell, S. Q., & Piasta, S. B. (2013). Bi-directional dynamics underlie the complexity of talk in teacher-child play-based conversations in classrooms serving at-risk pupils. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(3), 496–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, E., & Muñoz, C. (2013). The influence of exposure, parents, and linguistic distance on young European learners’ foreign language comprehension. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10(1), 105–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(1995). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (Ed.). (2006). Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Contrasting effects of starting age and input on the oral performance of foreign language learners. Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 463–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolov, M., & Mihaljević Djigunović, J. (2011). All shades of every color: An overview of early teaching and learning of foreign languages. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 95–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Núñez, B., & Dafouz, E. (2007). Lecturing through the foreign language in a CLIL University context: Linguistic and pragmatic Implications. VIEWS, 16(3), 36–42.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., Nicoladis, E., Crago, M., & Genesee, F. (2011). Bilingual children’s acquisition of the past tense: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language, 38(3), 554–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quiroz, B. G., Snow, C. E., & Zhao, J. (2010). Vocabulary skills of Spanish – English bilinguals: impact of mother – child language interactions and home language and literacy support. International Journal of Bilingualism, 14(4), 379–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models : Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rietveld, T., & Van Hout, R. (1993). Statistical techniques for the study of language and language behaviour. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowe, M. L. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development. Child Development, 83(5), 1762–1774. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheele, A. F., Leseman, P. P., & Mayo, A. Y. (2010). The home language environment of monolingual and bilingual children and their language proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(1), 117–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thijs, A., Tuin, D., & Trimbos, A. (2011). Engels in het basisonderwijs: Verkenning van de stand van zaken [English in elementary education: An exploration of the state of the art]. Enschede, The Netherlands: SLO.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2016). Early child L2 acquisition: Age or input effects? Neither, or both? Journal of Child Language, 43(3), 608–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S., Persson, L., Prins, T., & De Bot, K. (2014). An investigation of factors affecting early foreign language learning in the Netherlands. Applied Linguistics, 36(5), 527–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Hout, R., & Vermeer, A. (1988). Spontane taaldata en het meten van lexicale rijkdom in tweedetaalverwerving [Spontaneous speech data and measuring methods of lexical richness in second language acquisition]. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, 32, 108–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(2), 217–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weitz, M., Pahl, S., Flyman Mattsson, A., Buyl, A., & Kalbe, E. (2010). The input quality observation scheme (IQOS): The nature of L2 input and its influence on L2 development in bilingual preschools. Bilingual Preschools, 1, 5–44.Google Scholar
Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). A default Bayesian hypothesis test for correlations and partial correlations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(6), 1057–1064. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Goriot, Claire & Roeland van Hout
2023. Primary-school teachers’ beliefs about the effects of early-English education in the Dutch context: communicative scope, disadvantaged learning, and their skills in teaching English. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 26:4 ► pp. 498 ff. DOI logo
Michel, Marije, Christine Vidon, Rick de Graaff & Wander Lowie
2021. Language Learning beyond English in the Netherlands: A fragile future?. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 9:1 ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.