This paper focuses on the various demonstrative and relative constructions attested in the two Ju dialectal groups for which some level of documentation is available, viz. North-Central and South-Eastern, and proposes a unified diachronic account of the diversity of properties and uses of these constructions. The main claim is that exophoric demonstratives were verbs in Proto-Ju. Demonstrative and relative constructions in modern Ju dialects are shown to derive through various grammaticalisation pathways from these Proto-Ju verbal demonstratives and a relative construction still marginally attested in modern North-Central Ju. The complexity found in North-Central lects is due to numerous innovations (in particular the depredicativisation of non-canonical verbal categories) and the co-occurrence of many historical layers in synchrony. Juǀ’hoan, on the other hand underwent only minor changes, preserving most of the properties of the Proto-Ju demonstrative and relative constructions.
2022. Extending !Xun dialect comparisons with a Ju|’hoan variety spoken in |Xae|xae, Botswana: gender classes, plural markers and loanwords. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 43:1 ► pp. 119 ff.
Pratchett, Lee J.
2021. An areal and typological appraisal of gender in Ju. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 74:2 ► pp. 279 ff.
2020. Where do demonstratives come from?. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:3 ► pp. 403 ff.
Güldemann, Tom & Anne-Maria Fehn
2017. The Kalahari Basin Area as a ‘Sprachbund’ before the Bantu Expansion. In The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics, ► pp. 500 ff.
Guérin, Valérie
2015. Demonstrative verbs: A typology of verbal manner deixis. Linguistic Typology 19:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.