Cover not available
Part of
Variation within and across Romance Languages: Selected papers from the 41st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Ottawa, 5–7 May 2011
Edited by Marie-Hélène Côté and Eric Mathieu
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 333] 2014
► pp. 39–62

Phonology-morphology opacity in Harmonic Serialism

The case of /s/ aspiration in Spanish

| VU University Amsterdam

In this paper I defend the idea that prosodification in Harmonic Serialism is built in harmonically improving steps and propose that prosodic constituents higher than the syllable create opaque domains for syllable-building operations. Those assumptions prevent core syllabification to operate with adjacent segments belonging to different morphs if one of the segments, but not the other, is contained in a prosodic constituent higher than the syllable at some intermediate level of representation. The case of opacity by overapplication of /s/ aspiration in Spanish due to word- and phrasal-level resyllabification finds a straightforward explanation in those terms. The relative transparency of the aspiration process found in different dialects of Spanish is derived by the relative position that the markedness constraint CodaCondition occupies with respect to two families of constraints enforcing prosodification: Parse-Segment » Parse-ProsodicWord, and two morphology-prosody alignment constraints, Align-Left (Stem, ProsodicWord) » Align-Left (MorphologicalWord, ProsodicWord).

Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.333.05tor
References
Baković, Eric
1999 “Spanish Codas and Overapplication”. Romance Linguistics. Theoretical Perspectives: Selected papers from the 27th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XXVII), Irvine, 20–22 February 1997 ed. by Armin Schwegler, Bernard Tranel & Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria, 13–23. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo
2011 “Cyclicity”. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology ed. by Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice, 2019–2048. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Stratal Optimality Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Colina, Sonia
1997 “Identity Constraints and Spanish Resyllabification”. Lingua 103.1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “Interdialectal Variation in Spanish /s/ Aspiration: The role of prosodic structure and output-to-output constraints”. Structure, Meaning, and Acquisition in Spanish: Papers from the 4th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (HLS 4), Bloomington, 17–19 November 2000 ed. by James F. Lee, Kimberly L. Geeslin & J. Clancy Clements, 230–243. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Elfner, Emily
2009 “Syllabification and Stress-Epenthesis Interactions in Harmonic Serialism”. Ms.,University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
In press. “Stress-Epenthesis Interactions in Harmonic Serialism”. Harmonic Grammar and Harmonic Serialism ed. by John J. McCarthy & Joe Pater London Equinox
Fábregas, Antonio
2010 “Revisiting the Phonological Properties of Morphological Constituents: The case of diminutives”. Ms.,University of Tromsø.
Guitart, Jorge
1976 Markedness and a Cuban Dialect of Spanish. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, James
1983 Syllable Structure and Stress in Spanish: A nonlinear analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1993 “Integrity of Prosodic Constituents and the Domain of Syllabification Rules in Spanish and Catalan”. The View from Building 20: Linguistic essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger ed. by Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser. 177–193. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, James & Ellen M. Kaisse
1999 “Palatal Vowels, Glides and Obstruents in Argentinian Spanish”. Phonology 16.117–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hualde, José I
1989 “Silabeo y estructura morfemática en español”. Hispania 72.821–831. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991a “On Spanish Syllabification”. Current Studies in Spanish Linguistics ed. by Héctor Campos & Fernando Martínez-Gil, 475–493. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1991b “Aspiration and Resyllabification in Chinato Spanish”. Probus 3.55–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 The Sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Armin Mester
1994 “Reflections on Coda Condition and Alignment”. Phonology at Santa Cruz ed. by Jaye Padgett & Rachel Walker, vol. 3, 27–46. Santa Cruz: Linguistics Research Center, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Jesney, Karen
2011 “Positional Faithfulness, Non-Locality, and the Harmonic Serialism Solution”. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 39 (NELS 39), Ithaca, 7–9 November 2008 ed. by Suzi Lima, Kevin Mullin & Brian Smith, 429–440. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen M
1996 “The Prosodic Environment of s-Weakening in Argentinian Spanish”. Grammatical Theory and Romance Languages: Selected papers from the 25th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XXV), Seattle, 2–4 March 1995 ed. by Karen Zagona, 123–134. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 “Resyllabification Precedes All Segmental Rules: Evidence from Argentinian Spanish”. Formal Perspectives on Romance Linguistics: Selected papers from the 28th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XXVIII), University Park, 16–19 April 1998 ed. by Jean-Marc Authier, Barbara E. Bullock & Lisa A. Reed, 197–210. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Sympathy Meets Argentinian Spanish”. The Nature of the Word: Studies in honor of Paul Kiparsky ed. by Kristin Hanson & Sharon Inkelas, 199–214. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen M. & April McMahon
2011 “Lexical Phonology and the Lexical Syndrome”. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology ed. by Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice, 2236–2257. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael
1995 “Base Identity and Uniform Exponence: Alternatives to cyclicity”. Current Trends in Phonology: Models and methods ed. by Jacques Durand & Bernard Laks, 363–393. Salford: European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford.Google Scholar
Kimper, Wendell A
2011 “Locality and Globality in Phonological Variation”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29.423–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1973 “Abstractness, Opacity and Global Rules”. Phonological Representations ed. by Osamu Fujimura, 57–86. Tokyo: Tokyo Institute for Advanced Studies of Language.Google Scholar
2000 “Opacity and Cyclicity”. The Linguistic Review 17.351–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J
2000 “Harmonic Serialism and Parallelism”. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 30 (NELS 30), 22–24 October 1999 ed. by Masako Hirotani, Andries Coetzee, Nancy Hall & Ji-yung Kim, 501–524. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.Google Scholar
2007a “Restraint of Analysis”. Freedom of Analysis ed. by Sylvia Blaho, Patrik Bye & Martin Krämer, 203–231. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2007b Hidden Generalizations: Phonological opacity in Optimality Theory. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2008a “The Gradual Path to Cluster Simplification”. Phonology 25.271–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008b “The Serial Interaction of Stress and Syncope”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26.499–546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010a “An Introduction to Harmonic Serialism”. Language and Linguistics Compass 4.1001–1018. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010b “Studying Gen”. Phonological Studies. Journal of the Phonological Society of Japan 13:2.3–12.Google Scholar
2010c “Autosegmental Spreading in Optimality Theory”. Tones and Features (Clements memorial volume) ed. by John Goldsmith, Elizabeth Hume & Leo Wetzels, 195–222. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2012 “Pausal Phonology and Morpheme Realization”. Prosody Matters: Essays in honor of Lisa Selkirk ed. by Toni Borowsky, Shigeto Kawahara, Takahito Shinya & Mariko Sugahara, 341–373. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Alan Prince
1993 “Generalized Alignment”. Yearbook of Mophology ed. By Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle, 79–153. Dordrecht: Springer-Science. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morris, Richard E
2000 “Constraint Interaction in Spanish /s/-Aspiration: Three peninsular varieties”. Hispanic Linguistics at the Turn of the Millennium: Proceedings of the 3rd Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (HLS 3), Georgetown, 8–10 October 1999 ed. by Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger, Alfonso Morales-Front & Thomas J. Walsh, 14–30. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Pater, Joe
2012 “Serial Harmonic Grammar and Berber Syllabification”. Prosody Matters: Essays in honor of Elisabeth Selkirk ed. by Toni Borowsky, Shigeto Kawahara, Takahito Shinya & Mariko Sugahara, 43–72. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon
1997 Prosodic Words. (= HIL dissertations 34.) The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan
2002 “Arguing Optimality”. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 26: Papers in Optimality Theory II ed. by Angela Carpenter, Andries Coetzee & Paul de Lacy, 269–304. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky
1993/2004 “Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar”. Optimality Theory in Phonology: A reader ed. by John J. McCarthy, 1–71. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pruitt, Kathyn
2010 “Serialism and Locality in Constraint-Based Metrical Parsing”. Phonology 27.481–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roca, Iggy
2005 “Strata, Yes; Structure Preservation, No: Evidence from Spanish”. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003: Selected papers from Going Romance 2003, Nijmegen, 20–22 November 2003 ed. by Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jacobs, 197–218. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1995 “The Prosodic Structure of Function Words”. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory ed. by Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey & Suzanne Urbanczyk, 439–447. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.Google Scholar
Wiltshire, Caroline R
2002 “Variation in Spanish Aspiration and Prosodic Boundary Constraints”. Current Issues in Romance Languages: Selected papers from the 29th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XXIX), Ann Arbor, 8–11 April 1999 ed. by Teresa Satterfield, Christina Tortora & Diana Cresti, 375–389. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Prefix Boundaries in Spanish Varieties: A non-derivational OT account”. Optimality-Theoretic Studies in Spanish Phonology ed. by Sonia Colina & Fernando Martínez-Gil, 358–377. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Matthew A
2008 Optimal Interleaving: Serial phonology-morphology interaction in a constraint-based model. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.