Cover not available
Part of
Afroasiatic: Data and perspectives
Edited by Mauro Tosco
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 339] 2018
► pp. 11–22

Did Proto-Afroasiatic have marked nominative or nominative-accusative alignment?

The case system of Berber and Cushitic displays nominative-absolutive alignment, or a marked nominative system, a feature intermediary between ergative-absolutive and nominative-accusative alignment. Comparison of the cases of the nouns with the paradigms of the personal pronoun:
A.
independent / predicative (etc.) pronoun,
B.
dependent / object (etc.) pronoun,
C.
suffix / genitival (etc.) pronoun.
The two paradigms of the Semitic pronoun (independent and suffix pronoun) are a reduction of an original tripartite system, the suffix pronoun assuming functions of the dependent pronoun.
The numerous paradigms of the Berber and Chadic pronouns can be reduced to the same three basic paradigms. They can on their part be reduced to two, insofar as the independent and the dependent pronouns are ultimately of the same origin.
Correlation of noun cases and pronoun paradigms:
Proto-Afroasiatic
Noun
Absolutive case
Nominative case
Pronoun
1. Absolute pronoun (A),
2. dependent pronoun (B)
1. Suffix pronoun (C),
2. conjugation morpheme
Keywords: Afroasiatic cases, syntactic alignment, nominative-absolutive, alignment, marked nominative, paradigms of personal pronoun
Article outline
  • 1.Cases in Berber and Cushitic
  • 2.The nominative-absolutive alignment, or marked nominative system
  • 3.The personal pronoun in languages with nominative-absolutive alignment
  • 4.The personal pronoun in Afroasiatic: Egyptian, Cushitic
  • 5.The personal pronoun in Berber
  • 6.Chadic: the personal pronouns in Hausa
  • 7.Originally only two paradigms of the personal pronoun?
  • 8.Correlation of noun cases and pronoun paradigms
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 February 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.339.02sat
References (31)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Yu. 1995. “Split Ergativity in Berber Languages”. St. Petersburg Journal of African Studies 4.39–68.Google Scholar
Banti, Giorgio. 2003. “Grammatical Notes”. Vergari and Vergari 2003:7–36.Google Scholar
Beguinot, Francesco. 1942. Il berbero Nefusi di Fassato. 2a edizione. Roma: Istituto per l’Oriente.Google Scholar
Blažek, Václav, 1995. “The Microsystem of Personal Pronouns in Chadic, Compared with Afroasiatic”. Studia Chadica et Hamitosemitica, ed. by Dymitr Ibriszimow, Rudolf Leger, 1–22. Köln: Köppe.Google Scholar
Brugnatelli, Vermondo. 1986. “Alternanze accentuali e morofo-sintassi nominale nel berbero orientale”. Contributi di orientalistica, glottologia e dialettologia, 61–72. Milano: Cisalpino-Goliardica.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 2013. “Alignment of Case Marking of Full Noun Phrases”. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, chapters 98–99. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at [URL]
Dixon, Robert Malcolm Ward. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galand, Lionel. 1990. “Du nom au verb d’état. Le témoignage du berbère.” Proceedings of the Fifth International Hamito-Semitic Congress, ed. by Hans G. Mukarovski, I, 123–138. Wien: Veröffentlichung der Institute für Afrikanistik und Ägyptologie der Universität Wien (Beiträge zur Afrikanistik, Band 40).Google Scholar
Gensler, Orin. 2000. “Proto-Afroasiatic as a ‘Marked Nominative‘ Language.” Paper presented at: NACAL 28 (Portland, OR), March 10; WOCAL 3 (Lomé, Togo), August 22; Linguistisches Kolloquium, Humboldt-Universität Berlin, December 12.
Kapeliuk, Olga. 1998. “The Ethio-Semitic Possessive Pronouns as Predicalizers in Historical Perspective.” Aethiopica 1.148–163.Google Scholar
Kossmann, Maarten. 2013. A Grammatical Sketch of Ghadames Berber (Libya). Köln: Köppe.Google Scholar
Lamberti, Marcello. 1999. “The Pronouns of the 1st and 2nd Person in Cushitic and Their Reconstruction”. Afroasiatica Tergestina. Papers from the 9th Italian Meeting of Afro-Asiatic (Hamito-Semitic) Linguistics, ed. by Marcello Lamberti and Livia Tonelli, 347–361. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Lipiński, Edward. 2001. Semitic Languages: Outline of a Comparative Grammar (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 80), 2nd edn. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Newman, Paul. 2000. The Hausa Language: An Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1981. “Afroasiatisch”. Die Sprachen Afrikas, ed. by Bernd Heine, Thilo C. Schadberg & Ekkehard Wolff, 129–148. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
. 1984. “Case in Cushitic, Semitic and Berber”. Current Progress in Afro-asiatic Linguistics: Papers of the Third International Hamito-Semitic Congress, ed. by James Bynon, 111–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Satzinger, Helmut. 1968. „Äthiopische Parallelen zum ägyptischen sḏm.f .“ Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 23:163–166.Google Scholar
. 1991. “Structural Analysis of the Egyptian Independent Personal Pronoun”. Proceedings of the Fifth International Hamito-Semitic Congress 1987, vol. 2 ed. by Hans G. Mukarovsky, 121–135. Wien: Veröffentlichungen der Institute für Afrikanistik und Ägyptologie der Universität Wien.Google Scholar
. 2001. “On Ergativity in Egyptian”. New Data and New Methods in Afroasiatic Linguistics. Robert Hetzron in Memoriam, ed. by Andrzej Zaborski, 173–182. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
. 2002. “The Egyptian Connection: Egyptian and the Semitic Languages”. Israel Oriental Studies 20.227–264.Google Scholar
. 2003a. “Statuses and Cases of the Afroasiatic Personal Pronoun”. Egyptian and Semito-Hamitic (Afro-Asiatic) Studies in Memoriam W. Vycichl, ed. by Gábor Takács, 487–498. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. 2003b. “The Egyptian Conjugations within the Afroasiatic Framework.” Egyptology at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century: Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Egyptologists, Cairo, 2000, vol. 3 ed. by Zahi Hawass & Lyla Pinch Brock, 392–400. Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Some Remarks on the Afroasiatic Case System”. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 94.177–183.Google Scholar
. 2005. “On the Assumed Ergativity of the Berber Language(s)”. Proceedings of the 10th Meeting of Hamito-Semitic (Afroasiatic) Linguistics (Florence, 18–20 April 2001), ed. by Pelio Fronzaroli & Paolo Marrassini, 381–389. Firenze: Università di Firenze, Dipartimento di Linguistica.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. “Zero Article, Bare Noun, Absolutive Case.” In a Festschrift.
Van Putten, Marijn. 2014. A Grammar of Awjila Berber (Libya). Köln: Köppe.Google Scholar
Vergari, Moreno, and Roberta Vergari. 2003. A Basic Saho-English-Italian Dictionary, with an English-Saho Index and Grammatical Notes, by Giorgio Banti and Moreno Vergari. Asmara: Sabur Print Services.Google Scholar
Wolff, Ekkehard. 1981. “Berber”. Die Sprachen Afrikas, ed. by Bernd Heine, Thilo C. Schadberg & Ekkehard Wolff, 171–185. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
World Atlas of Language Structures (WALS). Available online at [URL]
Zaborski, Andrzej. 1998. “Personal Pronoun Systems and their Origin in Some Languages of Ethiopia”. Languages & Linguistics 1.65–86.Google Scholar
. 2001. “The Origin of the Suffix ‘Conjugations’ in Afroasiatic Languages”. Sprawozdania z Posiedzeń Komisji Naukowych 45.59–61.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Satzinger, Helmut
2024. [Review of] Maria Victoria Almansa-Villatoro & Silvia Štubňová Nigrelli (eds), Ancient Egyptian and Afroasiatic. Rethinking the Origins, Languages of the Ancient Near East, University Park/PA: Eisenbrauns 2023. Lingua Aegyptia - Journal of Egyptian Language Studies :32 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Cecchetto, Carlo & Caterina Donati
2023. Labeling (Reduced) Structures: When VPs Are Sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 55:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.