References
Abraham, Werner
2006Introduction: Passivization and typology. Form vs. function – a confined survey into the research status quo. In Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and Typology. Form and Function, 1–27. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Elisabeth Leiss
2006aThe impersonal passive: Voice suspended under aspectual conditions. In Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and Typology. Form and Function, 493–508. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006bPersonal and impersonal passives: Definite vs. indefinite diatheses. Transactions of the Philological Society 104:2. 259–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ackema, Peter & Ad Neeleman
1998Conflict resolution in passive formation. Lingua 104. 13–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Brigitte
1998Impersonal verbs in Italic: Their development from an Indo-European perspective. Journal of Indo-European Studies 26. 91–120.Google Scholar
2000Archaic syntax in Indo-European. The spread of transitivity in Latin and French. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Émile
1966 [1946]Structure des relations de personne dans le verbe. In Émile Benveniste (ed.), Problèmes de linguistique générale. Vol. 1, 225–236. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Blevins, James P.
2003Passives and impersonals. Journal of Linguistics 39. 473–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buck, Carl D.
1904A grammar of Oscan and Umbrian: With a collection of inscriptions and a glossary. Boston: Ginn & Co.Google Scholar
Calboli, Gualtiero
1962Studi grammaticali. Studi pubblicati dall’istituto di filologia classica. XI. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
2005The accusative as a ‘default’ case in Latin subordinate clauses. Indogermanische Forschungen 110. 235–266.Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela
2011Impersonal constructions and accusative subjects in Late Latin. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: a cross-linguistic perspective, 169–188. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clackson, James P. T.
2007Indo-European linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976The syntax of action nominals: A cross-linguistic study. Lingua 40. 177–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977In defense of spontaneous demotion: The impersonal passive. In Peter Cole & Jerrold M. Sadock (eds.), Syntax & Semantics 8: Grammatical Relations, 47–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2011Action nominals between verbs and nouns. Rivista di Linguistica 23:1. 7–20.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1971 [1952]Sistema norma e «parole». In Eugenio Coseriu (ed.), Teoria del linguaggio e linguistica generale, 19–103. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Cowgill, Warren
1968The first person singular medio-passive in Indo-Iranian. In Jan C. Heesterman, Godard H. Schokker & Vadesery I. Subramoniam (eds.), Pratidānam. Indian, Iranian, and Indo-European studies presented to Franciscus Bernardus Jacobus Kuiper on his sixtieth birthday, pp. 24–31. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1979Anatolian hi-Conjugation and Indo-European perfect: Instalment II. In Wolfgang Meid & Erich Neu (eds.), Hethitisch und Indogermanisch, vergleichende Studien zur historischen Grammatik und zur dialektgeographischen Stellung der indogermanischen Sprachgruppe Altkleinasiens, 25–39. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
1983On the prehistory of the Celtic passive and deponent inflection. Ériu 34. 73–111.Google Scholar
1987The Second plural of the Umbrian verb. In George Cardona & Norman H. Zide (eds.), Festschrift für H. Hoenigswald, 81–90. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Crawford, Michael H.
1996 (ed.). Roman statutes. London: Institute of Classical Studies – University of London.Google Scholar
Crawford, Michael H., Broadhead, William M., Clackson, James P. T., Santangelo, Federico, S. Thompson, M. Watmough
(eds.) 2011Imagines Italicae: A Corpus of Italic inscriptions. 3 vols. London: Institute of Classical Studies – University of London.Google Scholar
De Bernardo Stempel, Patrizia
1999Nominale Wortbildung des älteren Irischen. Stammbildung und Derivation. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deckman, A
1920A study of the impersonal passive of the ventum est type. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Dupraz, Emmanuel
2011Sabellian demonstratives: Forms and functions. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernout, Alfred
1908–1909Recherches sur l’emploi du passif latin a l’époque républicaine. Mémoires de la Société de linguistique de Paris 15. 273–333.Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & François Thomas
1953Syntaxe Latine. Klincksieck: Paris.Google Scholar
Eyþórsson, Thórhallur
2008The New passive in Icelandic really is a passive. In Thórhallur Eyþórsson (ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory: The Rosendal papers, 173–219. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara
2014Experiential Constructions in Latin. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flobert, Pierre
1967Déponent et passif en italique et en celtique. Annales de Bretagne 74:4. 567–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975Les verbes déponents latins des origines á Charlemagne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Franchi de Bellis, Annalisa
1981Le iovile capuane (Lingue e iscrizioni dell’Italia antica 2). Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
1982Indefinite agent, passive, and the impersonal passive: A functional approach. Lingua 58. 267–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Ramón, José Luis
1993Zur Morphosyntax der passivischen Infinitive im Oskisch-Umbrischen: u. -f(e)i, o. -fír und ursabell. *-fi̯ẹ̅ (*dhi̯eh1 ). In Helmut Rix (ed.), Oskisch-Umbrisch. Texte und Grammatik, 106–124. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Gianollo, Chiara
2005Middle voice in Latin and the phenomenon of split intransitivity. In Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), Latina lingua! Proceedings of the XII Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, 97–109. Roma: Herder.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1979On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1981Typology and functional domains. Studies in Language 5:2. 163–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 [1990]Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Vol. 2. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy & Boniface Kawasha
2006Indiscrete grammatical relations: The Lunda passive. In Tasaku Tsunoda & Taro Kageyama (eds.), Voice and Grammatical Relations: In Honor of Masayoshi Shibatani (Typological Studies in Language 65), 15–41. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gusmani, Roberto
1966Umbrisch pihafi und Verwandtes. Indogermanische Forschungen 71. 64–80.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1990The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14:1. 25–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirt, Hermann
1939Hauptprobleme der indogermanischen Sprachwissenschaft (ed. by H. Arntz). Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Hoffner, Harry A. & H. Craig Melchert
2008A grammar of the Hittite language. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Jay
1977The r-endings of the IE middle. Die Sprache 24. 159–170.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Jay H.
2006The Origin of the Latin gerund and gerundive: A new proposal. In Harvey Goldblatt & Nancy Shields Kollman (eds.), Rus’Writ large: Languages, histories, cultures. Essays presented in honor of Michael S. Flier on his sixty-fifth birthday. Harvard Ukrainian Studies 28:1–4. 195–208.Google Scholar
Ježek, Elisabetta & Paolo Ramat
2009On Parts-of-Speech transcategorization. Folia Linguistica 43:2. 391–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward L.
1975Some Universals of passive in Relational Grammar. In Robin E. Grossman, L. James Sam & Timothy J. Vance (eds.), Papers from the eleventh regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 340–352. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1976Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 303–333. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Alan Timberlake
1985Predicate formation rules in Universal Grammar. In Jeffrey Goldberg, Susannah MacKaye & Michael Wescoat (eds.), Proceedings of the fourth West Coast Conference on formal linguistics, 123–138. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993The middle voice (Typological studies in language 23). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibort, Anna & Joan Maling
2015Modelling the syntactic ambiguity of the active vs. passive impersonal in LFG. In Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG15 Conference, 146–165. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Letizia Vezzosi
2004The Role of predicate meaning in the development of reflexivity. In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 213–244. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
1993Nominalizations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid & Nikolaos Lavidas
2013Reconstructing passive and voice in Proto-Indo-European. Journal of Historical Linguistics 1:3. 98–121.Google Scholar
Kurzová, Helena
Labov, William
1994Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lambert, Pierre-Yves
1998aL’impersonnel. In Jack Feuillet (ed.), Actance et valence dans les langues de l’Europe, 295–346. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1998bL’actance dans les langues celtiques. In Jack Feuillet (ed.), Actance et valence dans les langues de l’Europe, 811–848. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1976Non-distinct arguments in Uto-Aztecan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lazzeroni, Romano
2012Scala o scale di nominalità? Il caso dei nomi d’azione vedici. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 97:2. 1–14.Google Scholar
2014L’attuazione di un mutamento: perfetto e medio in alcune lingue indoeuropee. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 99. 129–154.Google Scholar
In press. Sulla formazione dell’aoristo ‘passivo’ sanscrito. In Velizar Sadovski ed. Festschrift für R. Schmitt
Lehmann, Winfred
1991Impersonal verbs as relics of a subclass in Pre-Indo-European. In Georgij Klimov (ed.), Istoričeskaja lingvistika i typologija [Historical linguistics and typology], 33–38. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
1993Theoretical bases of Indo-European linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
1995Unaccusativity. At the syntax/lexical semantics interface. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lindsay, Wallace M.
1907Syntax of Plautus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
1997Hittite. München & Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
2008Split intransitives, experiencer objects, and transimpersonal constructions. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment, 76–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Akio Ogawa
2011Towards a typology of impersonal constructions: a semantic map approach. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: a cross-linguistic perspective, 19–56. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Anna Siewierska
2011Introduction. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: a cross-linguistic perspective, 1–16. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan & Catherine O’Connor
2015Cognitive illusions: non-promotional passives and unspecified subject constructions. In Ida Toivonen, Piroska Csúri & Emile van der Zee (eds.), Structures in the mind: Essays on language, music, and cognition in honor of Ray Jackendoff, 101–118. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan & Sigrídur Sigurjónsdóttir
2002The new impersonal construction in Icelandic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5. 97–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marinetti, Anna & Aldo Luigi Prosdocimi
1994Appunti sul verbo latino (e) italico. II. Umbrica. Studi Etruschi 59. 168–201.Google Scholar
Martinet, André.
1955Review of W. Porzig, Die Gliederung des indogermanischen Sprachgebiets. Word 11. 126–132.Google Scholar
McCone, Kim
1997The Early Irish verb. Maynooth: An Sagart.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1937Introduction à l’étude comparative des langues indo-européennes. (8th ed.). Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Napoli, Maria
2011How impersonal is the Latin impersonal passive? In Peter Anreiter & Manfred Kienpointner (eds.), Latin linguistics today. Akten des 15. Internationalen Kolloquiums zur lateinischen Linguistik, 171–182. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
2013Semantic constraints on the Latin impersonal passive. On Telicity and Agentivity. In Elly van Gelderen, Michela Cennamo & Jóhanna Barðdal (eds.), Argument structure in flux: The Naples-Capri papers (Studies in Language Companion Series 131), 373–404. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neu, Erich
1968Das hethitische Mediopassiv und seine indogermanischen Grundlagen. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz.Google Scholar
Nolan, Brian
2006The passives of Modern Irish. In Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and typology. Form and function, 132–164. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1994A tale of two passives in Irish. In Barbara Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function, 279–311. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel & Louisa Sadler
2004Nominal tense in cross-linguistic perspective. Language 80. 776–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Alan
1973 Benuso, Couortuso, and the archetype of Tab. Ig. I and VI-VIIa. The Journal of Indo-European Studies 1:3. 356–369.Google Scholar
Panagl, Oswald
2006Zur verbalen Konstruktion deverbativer Nomina. In Emilio Crespo, Jesus de la Villa & Antonio Revuelta (eds.), Word classes and related topics in Ancient Greek, 47–57. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M.
1978Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4. 157–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. & Paul Postal
1984The 1-advancement exclusiveness law. In David M. Perlmutter & Carol G. Rosen (eds.), Studies in Relational Grammar 2, 81–125. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm
1992The Latin impersonal passive. Mnemosyne 45. 159–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Oxford Latin Syntax. Vol. 1: The Simple Clause. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pisani, Vittore
1951Uxor. Ricerche di morfologia indeuropea. Miscellanea Galbiati. Vol. 3. Milano: Hoepli. Fontes Ambrosiani 27. 1–38.Google Scholar
Primus, Beatrice
2010Event-structure and individuation in impersonal passives. In Patrick Brandt & Marco García García (eds.), Transitivity. Form, meaning, acquisition and processing, 209–233. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Animacy and telicity: Semantic constraints on impersonal passives. Lingua 121. 80–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prosdocimi, Aldo Luigi
1996aAppunti sul verbo latino (e) italico. VII. Studi Etruschi 61. 263–312.Google Scholar
1996bLa Tavola di Agnone. Una interpretazione. In Loretta Del Tutto Palma (ed.), La Tavola di Agnone nel contesto italico, 435–630. Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar
Risch, Ernst
1984Gerundivum und Gerundium. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rix, Helmut
1976Die umbrischen Infinitive auf -fi und die urindogermanische Infinitivendung *dhiōi . In Anna Morpurgo Davies & Wolfgang Meid (eds.), Studies in Greek, Italic, and Indo-European Linguistics offered to L.R. Palmer, 319–331. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
1986Die Endung des Akk. Pl. commune im Osk. In Annemarie Etter (ed.), O-o-pe-ro-si: Festschrift für Ernst Risch zum 75. Geburtstag, 583–597. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romagno, Domenica
2002Diatesi indoeuropea e verbi di movimento greci: alcune considerazioni sull’intransitività. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 87. 163–174.Google Scholar
2005Il perfetto omerico. Diatesi, azionalità e ruoli tematici. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Rosén, Hanna
1981Studies in the syntax of the verbal noun in Early Latin. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
1983The mechanisms of Latin nominalization and conceptualization in a historical view. In Wolfgang Haase (eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (II 29,1), 179–211. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Russell, Paul
1995An introduction to the Celtic languages. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sansò, Andrea
2006‘Agent defocusing’ revisited: Passive and impersonal constructions in some European languages. In Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and typology. Form and function, 232–273. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Voice constructions from nominalized VPs: a cross-linguistic type?, [URL].Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian
2012The passive of reflexive verbs and its implications for theories of binding and case. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 15. 213–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Karl H.
1963Zum altirischen Passiv. Indogermanische Forschungen 68. 257–275.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1985Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language 61:4. 821–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
1984The passive. A comparative linguistic analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
2008Introduction: Impersonalization: an agent based vs. a subject based perspective. In Anna Siewierska (ed.), Impersonal constructions in grammatical theory. Transactions of the Philological Society 106:2. 1–23.Google Scholar
2011Overlap and complementarity in reference impersonals: Man-constructions vs. third person plural-impersonals in the languages of Europe. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: a cross-linguistic perspective, 57–89. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simone, Raffaele
2008Coefficienti verbali nei nomi. In Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentina Bambini, Cristina Bertoncin & Margherita Farina (eds.), Categorie del verbo. Diacronia, teoria, tipologia, 83–113. Roma: Il Calamo.Google Scholar
Sorace, Antonella
2000Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language 76:4. 859–890. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Gradience at the lexicon-syntax interface: evidence from auxiliary selection and implications for unaccusativity. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle, 243–268. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spevak, Olga
2014Noun valency in Latin. In Olga Spevak (ed.), Noun valency, 183–210. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, Edgar H.
1944Hittite verbal nouns in -tar and the Latin gerund. Language 20. 206–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1951Comparative grammar of the Hittite language. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald
1996Introduction to Indo-European linguistics. (4th ed.). Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan
1977Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 141–177. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1982The impersonal passive in Lithuanian. Berkeley Linguistics Society 8. 508–524.Google Scholar
Thurneysen, Rudolf
1993 [1946]A grammar of Old Irish (English translation by Daniel A. Binchy & Osborn J. Bergin). Dublin: Dublin University Press.Google Scholar
Untermann, Jürgen
2000Wörterbuch des Oskisch-Umbrischen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Van Hout, Angeliek
2004Unaccusativity as telicity checking. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle, 60–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D.Jr.
1990Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66. 221–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendryes, Joseph
1956Sur l’emploi impersonnel du verbe. Celtica 3. 185–197.Google Scholar
Villanueva Svensson, Miguel
2001The Italic simple R-endings. Glotta 75. 252–266.Google Scholar
Vogel, Petra M.
2006Das unpersönliche Passiv. Eine funktionale Untersuchung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Deutschen und seiner historischen Entwicklung. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Calvert
1969Indogermanische Grammatik. 3. Band: Geschichte der indogermanischen Verbalflexion. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, Jakob
1981Vorlesungen über Syntax. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn.
2006Relations between Actor-demoting devices in Lithuanian: Dedicated to Emma Geniušienė. In Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and typology. Form and function, 274–309. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, Heinrich
1890Über das italo-keltische Passivum und Deponens. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 30. 223–292.Google Scholar