References
Anderson, Stephen. R.
1971On the role of deep structure in semantic interpretation. Foundations of Language 7. 387–396.Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia L.
1995Case marking and reanalysis. Grammatical relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beavers, John
2010The Structure of Lexical Meaning: Why Semantics Really Matters. Language 86. 821–864. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017The spray/load alternation. In Martin Everaert, Henk van Rimsdijk, Rob Goedemans & Bart Hellebrandse, (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 466–478. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, [URL]. (7 August, 2018.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blake, Barry
1994Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. & Herbert H. Clark
1979When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55. 767–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David
2000The fallacy of argument alternation. In Ravin Yael & Claudia Laecock (eds.), Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches, 111–128. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur
1995Verbal syntax in the early Germanic languages. Ithaca: Cornell University doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. J.
1968The case for case. In Emmon Bach & Robert Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory. 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade, Willem Koopman & Wim van der Wurff
2000The syntax of early English (Cambridge Syntax Guides 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fumiko, Yoshikawa
2007An etymological note on verbs which show locative alternation. Studies in the Humanities and Sciences XXXXVIII No. 2. 203–223.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. E.
1995Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
van. Kemenade, Ans
1987Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans
1997V2 and embedded topicalization in Old and Middle English. In Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), Parameters of morphosyntactic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 326–352.Google Scholar
van. Kemenade, Ans, and Bettelou Los
2003Particles and prefixes in Dutch and English. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology. 79–118. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
1998Morphology and lexical semantics. In Andrew Spencer and Arnold Zwicky (eds.), The handbook of morphology, 248–271. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
2006English alternations: a unified account. [URL]. (16 December, 2015.)
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
2005Argument realization (Research Surveys in Linguistics Series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McFadden, Thomas
2013Resultativity and the development of Germanic preverbal ge- from Old to Middle English. [URL]. (1 November – 16 December, 2015.)
Millward, C. M. & Mary Hayes
2012A biography of the English language. Boston: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce
1985Old English syntax. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Oxford English Dictionary (OED) 2013 Oxford: Oxford University Press, [URL]. (1 November – 16 December, 2015.)Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven
1989Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rappaport, Malka and Beth Levin
1988What to do with θ-roles. In Wendy Wilkins (ed.). Syntax and Semantics 21. Thematic Relations. San Diego: Academic Press, 7–36.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin
1998Building verb meanings. In Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors. 97–134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2008The English dative alternation: the case for verb sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics 44. 129–167.Google Scholar
Schwartz-Norman, Linda
1976The Grammar of Content and Container. Journal of Linguistics 12. 279–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth. C.
1972The history of English syntax. A transformational approach to the history of English sentence structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann, et al.
2003York-Toronto-Helsinki parsed corpus of Old English prose (YCOE). York: University of York.Google Scholar
Toller, Thomas N. & Alistair Campbell
(eds.) [1838] 1972An Anglo- Saxon dictionary, based on the manuscript collection of late Joseph Bosworth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Visser, Frederik Th.
1963/1973An historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Walkden, George
2014Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasow, Thomas
1997Remarks on grammatical weight. Language Variation and Change 9. 81–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar