Cover not available
Part of
All Things Morphology: Its independence and its interfaces
Edited by Sedigheh Moradi, Marcia Haag, Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 353] 2021
► pp. 81–98

Chapter 5
Leaving the stem by itself

ORCID logo | Université de Paris, LLF, CNRS
ORCID logo | University of Surrey, SMG
Stem allomorphy plays a central role in the recent history of morphology, in no small part thanks to a research program initiated by Aronoff (1994). Yet, there is no agreed upon way of deciding whether some bit of form should be considered a proper part of a stem allomorph or an independent exponent. We explore the possibility of just doing away with the notion of stem allomorphy in inflection. We use computational methods to identify within each word a sequence of strings that do not take part in any alternation within that word’s paradigm. We then discuss the relationship of such sequences to the classical notion of a stem, and argue that discontinuous stems are both conceptually and empirically more satisfactory.
Keywords: stems, allomorphy, exponence, alignment, European Portuguese, English, French
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The quest for stem allomorphy
  • 3.Automatic inference of stems
    • 3.1Alignment
    • 3.2Unique discontinuous stems
    • 3.3Sets of continuous stems
  • 4.How useful are continuous stem allomorphs?
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 August 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.353.05bon
References (42)
References
Ackerman, Farrell, James P. Blevins & Robert Malouf. 2009. Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds.), Analogy in grammar, 54–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Farrell & Robert Malouf. 2013. Morphological organization: The low conditional entropy conjecture. Language 89. 429–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Albright, Adam & Bruce Hayes. 2006. Modeling productivity with the gradual learning algorithm: The problem of accidentally exceptionless generalizations. In Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry, Matthias Schlesewsky & Ralf Vogel (eds.), Gradience in grammar: Generative perspectives, 185–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Richard Piepenbrock & Leon Gulikers. 1995. Celex. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Beniamine, Sacha. 2018. Typologie quantitative des systèmes de classes flexionnelles. Paris: Université Paris Diderot dissertation.Google Scholar
Blevins, James. 2003. Stems and paradigms. Language 79. 737–767. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James P. 2006. Word based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42. 531–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. Word and paradigm morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bochner, Harry. 1993. Simplicity in generative morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier. 2012. Stems in inflection and lexeme formation. Word Structure 5(1). 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Sacha Beniamine. 2016. Joint predictiveness in inflectional paradigms. Word Structure 9(2). 156–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Gilles Boyé. 2002. Suppletion and stem dependency in inflectional morphology. In Franck Van Eynde, Lars Hellan & Dorothee Beerman (eds.), The proceedings of the HPSG ’01 conference, 51–70. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
. 2014. De formes en thèmes. In Florence Villoing, Sarah Leroy & Sophie David (eds.), Foisonnements morphologiques. etudes en hommage à Françoise Kerleroux, 17–45. Presses Universitaires de Paris Ouest.Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier, Gauthier Caron & Clément Plancq. 2014. Construction d’un lexique flexionnel phonétisé libre du français. In Franck Neveu, Peter Blumenthal, Linda Hriba, Annette Gerstenberg, Judith Meinschaefer & Sophie Prévost (eds.), Actes du quatrième congrès mondial de linguistique française, 2583–2596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Ana R. Luís. 2014. Sur la morphologie implicative dans la conjugaison du portugais: une étude quantitative. In Jean-Léonard Léonard (ed.), Morphologie flexionnelle et dialectologie romane. typologie(s) et modélisation(s). 111–151. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Boyé, Gilles & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr. 2006. The structure of allomorphy in spanish verbal inflection. In Cuadernos de lingüística, vol. 13, 9–24. Instituto Universitario Ortega y Gasset.Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan. 1998. Stem lndexing and morphonological selection in the Russian verb: A network morphology account. In Ray Fabri, Albert Ortmann & Teresa Parodi (eds.), Models of inflection, 196–224. Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron-Faulkner, Thea & Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy. 2000. Stem alternants as morphological signata: Evidence from blur avoidance in Polish nouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18. 813–835. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstairs, Andrew. 1987. Allomorphy in inflection. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1994. Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language 70. 737–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2007. Canonical typology, suppletion and possible words. Language 83.8–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durbin, Richard. 1998. Biological sequence analysis: Probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feng, Da-Fei & Russell F. Doolittle. 1987. Progressive sequence alignment as a prerequisite to correct phylogenetic trees. Journal of Molecular Evolution 25(4). 351–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frisch, Stefan. 1997. Similarity and frequency in phonology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University dissertation.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer B. & R. Harald Baayen. 2005. Shifting paradigms: gradient structure in morphology. TRENDS in Cognitive Science 9. 342–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1975. Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51. 639–671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
List, Johann-Mattis. 2014. Sequence comparison in historical linguistics. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 1992. Irregularity as a determinant of morphological change. Journal of Linguistics 28. 285–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. 1972. Inflectional morphology. A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montermini, Fabio & Olivier Bonami. 2013. Stem spaces and predictibility in verbal inflection. Lingue e Linguaggio 12. 171–190.Google Scholar
Needleman, Saul B. & Christian D. Wunsch. 1970. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology 48(3). 443–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pirrelli, Vito & Marco Battista. 2000. The paradigmatic dimension of stem allomorphy in Italian verb inflection. Rivista di Linguistica 12.Google Scholar
Sims, Andrea D. & Jeff Parker. 2016. How inflection class systems work: On the informativity of implicative structure. Word Structure 9. 215–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 2012. Identifying stems. Word Structure 5. 88–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional morphology. A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. & Raphael Finkel. 2013. Morphological typology: From word to paradigm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swiggers, Pierre & Karel van den Eynde. 1987. La morphologie du verbe français. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics 77–78. 151–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veiga, Arlindo Oliveira da, Sara Candeias & Fernando Perdigão. 2012. Generating a pronunciation dictionary for European Portuguese using a joint sequence model with embedded stress assignment. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society 19(2). 127–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walther, Géraldine. 2013. De la canonicité en morphologie: Perspective empirique, théorique et computationnelle. Paris: Université Paris Diderot dissertation.Google Scholar
Walther, Géraldine & Benoît Sagot. 2011. Modélisation et implémentation de phénomènes flexionnels noncanoniques. Traitement Automatique des Langues 52(2). 91–122.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ulrich. 1989. Inflectional morphology and naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

ESHER, LOUISE
2024. The intricate inflectional relationships underpinning morphological analogy. Journal of Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Beniamine, Sacha & Olivier Bonami
2023. Inflection Class Systems. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pellegrini, Matteo
2023. Flexemes in theory and in practice. Morphology 33:3 ► pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Pellegrini, Matteo
2023. The Theoretical Framework. In Paradigm Structure and Predictability in Latin Inflection [Studies in Morphology, 6], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.