Grammatical prototypes and competing motivations in a theory of linguistic change

Kemmer, Suzanne

doi:10.1075/cilt.84.10kem

Part of

Explanation in Historical Linguistics
Edited by Garry W. Davis and Gregory Iverson
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 84] 1992
► pp. 145–166

Grammatical prototypes and competing motivations in a theory of linguistic change

Suzanne Kemmer

Published online: 15 October 1992

https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.84.10kem

Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Order by:

Divjak, Dagmar, Natalia Levshina & Jane Klavan

2016. “Cognitive Linguistics: Looking back, looking forward”. Cognitive Linguistics 27:4 ► pp. 447 ff.

PETRÉ, PETER

2016. Grammaticalization by changing co-text frequencies, or why [BE Ving] became the ‘progressive’. English Language and Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 31 ff.

PETRÉ, PETER

2017. Connecting the past and the present – a response to Pentrel. English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 283 ff.

Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott

2003. Grammaticalization,

Kihm, Alain

2000. Review of Véronique (1996): Matériaux pour l’étude des classes grammaticales dans les langues créoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 15:1 ► pp. 225 ff.

[no author supplied]

2019. Patient-Subject Constructions in Mandarin Chinese [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 12],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.