Cover not available
Article published In:
Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 10:1 (2019) ► pp.84–112

How the Chinese language encourages the paradigm shift toward discourse in linguistics

Pressure from ‘the three zeros’

 | University of Oregon
The Chinese language has encouraged the paradigm shift in linguistics away from Chomsky-style sentence-internal rules toward usage-based discourse. Analysts have debated two possibilities: is Chinese an allegedly ‘inferior’ and ambiguous language because it rests on the ‘three zeros’: zero subjects, zero anaphora, and zero tense? Or does Chinese use ‘hidden complexity’ (Bisang 2009) to make reference clear by discourse marking? Chinese pressure points on linguistic theory center on these ‘three zeros’. Zero subjects have influenced a broader research category of topic-centered languages. Zero anaphora influenced reference tracking beyond the sentence. Zero tense expanded understanding of time and aspect. The process of the shift comes from international networks of multilingual scholars of Chinese. They have collaborated to form a critical mass of explicitly comparative, empirical research. Chinese interdisciplinary research has been especially influential in typology, child language, cross-cultural communications, translation and artificial intelligence. Fifty years ago, mainstream conferences, textbooks, books, and journals almost never featured Chinese. Now they routinely do.
Keywords: history of linguistics – Chinese, isolating language – Chinese, zero subject, zero anaphora, zero tense, hidden complexity, discourse-oriented language
Article outline
  • 1.Chinese encourages the linguistics paradigm shift toward discourse
    • 1.1Paradigm shifts in linguistics
      • 1.1.1Chomsky’s formal paradigm
      • 1.1.2The discourse paradigm
  • 2.Chinese ‘hidden complexity’ creates pressure points from the ‘three zeros’: Zero subject, zero anaphora and zero tense
    • 2.1Is Chinese a so-called ‘inferior’ language?
    • 2.2Chinese as a fully expressive language: Discourse beyond the sentence
    • 2.3Pressure points from the Chinese ‘three zeros’: Zero subject, zero anaphora and zero tense
      • 2.3.1Zero subjects stimulate understanding of topic
      • 2.3.2Zero anaphora stimulates understanding of reference tracking
      • 2.3.3Zero tense stimulates understanding of aspect and default assumptions
  • 3.How the paradigm shifts: International networks of comparative scholars
    • 3.1Critical mass
    • 3.2International connections
    • 3.3China’s rise
    • 3.4Non-China factors
  • 4.Breakthrough areas of Chinese influence: Typology, psycholinguistics, cross-cultural communication, translation and computers
    • 4.1Making Chinese-resistant theory Chinese-receptive
      • 4.1.1Typology
      • 4.1.2Psycholinguistics: Child language, brain and discourse, aphasia
      • 4.1.3Cross-cultural communications and comparative rhetoric
      • 4.1.4Translation and artificial intelligence demand discourse context
    • 4.2Evidence of influence on mainstream linguistics
  • References
Published online: 12 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.00015.erb
References (94)
References
Ai, Ruixi Ressy. 2014. ‘Topic-comment structure, focus movement, and gapping formation’. Linguistic Inquiry. 45:1,125–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Akmajian, Adrian, and Ann K. Farmer, Lee Bickmore, Robert A. Demers, and Robert M. Harnish, eds. 2017. Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication. Seventh edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ambridge, Ben and Elena V. M. Lieven. 2011. Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Au, Terry Kit-fong. 1992. ‘Counter-factual reasoning’. In G. R. Semin and K. Fiedler, eds. Language, interaction and social cognition. NY: Sage. 194–213.Google Scholar
. 2006. ‘The relationship between language and cognition’. In Ping Li, et al., eds. 281–286.Google Scholar
Beck, David and Donna B. Gerdts. 2017. ‘The contribution of research on the languages of the Americas to the field of linguistics’. International Journal of American Linguistics. 83:1;7–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellos, David. 2011. Is that a fish in your ear? Translation and the meaning of everything. NY: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 2009. ‘On the evolution of complexity: Sometimes less is more in East and mainland Southeast Asia’ in Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil and Peter Trudgill, eds. Linguistic complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 34–49.Google Scholar
. 2012. ‘Classifiers in Sinitic languages: From individuation to definiteness-marking’. Lingua. 1221:335–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. ‘Grammaticalization and contact – hidden complexity in the languages of East and mainland Southeast Asia’. Course on Linguistic complexity, grammaticalization and contact. Indian summer school in Linguistics at N[ational] R[esearch] U[niversity], H[igher] S[chool of] E[conomics]. Moscow. September 3, 2014.
Bisang, Walter, Wang Luming and Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky. 2013. ‘Subjecthood in Chinese: Neurolinguistics meets typology’. In Zhuo Jing-Schmidt, ed. Increased empiricism: Recent advances in Chinese linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 23–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Alfred. 1981. The linguistic shaping of thought: A study in the impact of language on thinking in China and the West. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 2002. ‘Searching for meaning in language: A memoir’. Historiographica Linguistica 291:246–261. Also [URL]
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Ping. 2015. ‘Referentiality and definiteness in Chinese’. In Wang and Sun, eds. 404–413.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chu, Chauncey C. 1998. A discourse grammar of Mandarin Chinese. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall. 1998. A sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. ‘ The sociology of philosophies: A precis’. Philosophy of the social sciences. 30:2,157–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Interaction ritual chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DéChaine, Rose-Marie and Eric Vatikiotis-Bateson. 2012. Linguistics for dummies. Mississauga, Ontario: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2018. ‘On the order of demonstrative, numeral, adjective and noun’. Language. 94:4,798–833. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erbaugh, Mary S. 1990. ‘Mandarin oral narratives compared with English: The Pear/Guava stories’. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association. 25:2,21–42.Google Scholar
1992. ‘The acquisition of Mandarin’ in Dan Isaac Slobin, ed. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Volume 31. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 373–456.Google Scholar
, ed. 2002. Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing. Columbus, OH: National East Asian Languages Resource Center, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
2013. ‘Classifier choices in discourse across the seven main Chinese dialects’. In Zhuo Jing-Schmidt, ed. Increased empiricism: Recent advances in Chinese linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 101–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. ‘The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 32:5,429–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan. 2014. The language myth Why language is not an instinct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. 2017. ‘Indigenous linguists: Bringing research into language revitalization’. International Journal of American Linguistics. 83:4,607–617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. ‘Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements’. In Joseph H. Greenberg, ed. Universals of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 73–113.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., edited by Jonathan Webster. 2005. Studies in Chinese language. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
He, Agnes Weiyun. 2015. ‘Chinese as a heritage language’. In Wang and Sun, eds. 578–589.Google Scholar
. 2018. ‘A non-linear view of interactional competence: Speaking Chinese as a heritage language’. In Chuanren Ke, ed. The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge. 336–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herman, Edward S. and Chomsky, Noam. 1988, 2002. Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media, with a new introduction by the authors. NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Hodge, Bob and Kam Louie. 1998. The politics of Chinese language and culture. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huang, Chiung-chih. 2006. ‘Child language acquisition of temporality in Mandarin Chinese’ in Li, Tan, Bates, and Tzeng, eds. 53–60.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren and Nianwen Xue. 2015. ‘Modeling word concepts without conventions: Linguistic and computational issues in Chinese word identification’ in Wang and Sun, eds. 348–361.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, Zhuo Jing-Schmidt and Barbara Meisterernst, eds. 2019. The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. T. James, Y. H. Audrey Li, and Andrew Simpson, eds. 2014. The handbook of Chinese linguistics. Malden, MA: John Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2014. Pragmatics: Second edition. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2018. ‘What tone teaches us about language’. Language. 94:3;698–709. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971 [1959]. ‘On linguistic aspects of translations’. Selected writings: Volume II. The Hague: Mouton. 260–266.Google Scholar
Jenks, Peter. 2018. ‘Articulated definiteness without articles’. Linguistic Inquiry. 49:3,501–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo. 2017. What are they good for? A constructionist account of counterfactuals in ordinary Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 1131,30–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo and Xinjia Peng. 2018. ‘Linguistic theories and teaching Chinese as a second language.’ In Chuanren Ke, ed., The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Second Language Acquisition, 63–81. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Robert B. 1966. ‘Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education’. Language Learning 16 (1 and 2):1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ke, Chuanren, ed. 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klavans, Judith and Amanda Stent. 2017. ‘Computational linguistics’. Chapter 18 in the e-version of O’Grady et al., eds. 18(1):18–37.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Landecker, Heidi. 2014. ‘A Deaf linguist explores Black American Sign Language’. Chronicle of Higher Education. January 9, 2014.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1976. ‘Subject and topic: A new typology of language’. In Charles N. Li, ed. Subject and topic. NY: Academic Press. 457–489.Google Scholar
. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Ping. 2006. ‘Modeling language acquisition and representation: connectionist networks’ in Li et al., eds. 320–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Ping, Li Hai Tan, Elizabeth Bates, and Ovid J. L. Tzeng, eds. 2006. The Handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics. Volume 1: Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Ping and Yasuhiro Shirai. 2000. The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Chien-Jer Charles. 2018. ‘Subject prominence and processing dependencies in prenominal relative clauses: The comprehension of possessive relative clauses and adjunct relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese’. Language. 94:4, 758–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Jo-Wang. 2003. ‘Temporal reference in Mandarin Chinese’. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 259–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Lisa G. 1985. ‘Reasoning counterfactually in Chinese: Are there any obstacles?’ Cognition. 211:239–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Meichun. 2015. ‘Tense and aspect in Mandarin Chinese’ in Wang and Sun, eds. 274–289.Google Scholar
Lu, Xiaofei and Berlin Chen (eds.). 2019. Computational and Corpus Linguistic Approaches to Chinese Language Learning. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Stephen and Virginia Yip. 2011. Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar: Second Edition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2014. The language hoax: Why the world looks the same in any language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Grady, William, John Archibald, Mark Aronoff, and Janie Rees-Miller, eds. 2017. Contemporary linguistics: An introduction. Seventh edition. Boston and New York: Bedford/St. Martins.Google Scholar
Pan, Yuling. 2000. Politeness in Chinese face-to-face interaction. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Pillsbury, Michael. 2015. The hundred-year marathon: China’s secret strategy to replace America as the global superpower. NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Poibeau, Thierry. 2017. Machine translation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Matthew. 2016. Translation: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowland, Caroline. 2013. Understanding child language acquisition. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, David E. and McClelland, Jay L. 1987. ‘Learning the past tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing?’ in Brian MacWhinney, ed. Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 195–248.Google Scholar
Qian, Guanlian 钱冠连. 1997. 汉语文化语用学 (Pragmatics in Chinese culture: Speechology in humanistic networks.) Beijing: Qinghua University Press.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron, Suzanne Wong Scollon, and Rodney F. Jones. 2012. Inter-cultural communication: A discourse approach. Third Edition. Hoboken, N. J.: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron, Suzanne Wong Scollon and Andy Kirkpatrick. 1998. Contrastive discourse in Chinese and English: A critical appraisal. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Shei, Chris, ed. 2019. Routledge handbook of Chinese discourse analysis. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlota S. 1997. The parameter of aspect: 2nd edition. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Modes of discourse: The local structure of texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlota S. and Mary S. Erbaugh. 2005. ‘Temporal interpretation in Mandarin Chinese’. Linguistics. 43:4,713–756. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tai, James H.-Y. and Jane S. Tsay. 2015. ‘Taiwan Sign Language; History, structure, and adaptation’. In Wang and Sun, eds. 729–750.Google Scholar
Tang, Gladys. 2015. ‘Hong Kong Sign Language’. In Wang and Sun, eds. 710–728.Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin, ed. 2016. Integrating Chinese linguistic research and language teaching and learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. ‘Spoken Chinese corpora: Construction and sample application in research and language pedagogy’. Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan (中國語學)。 2641:25–43.Google Scholar
Tardif, Twila. 2015. ‘Early vocabulary learning in Chinese-speaking children’. In Wang and Sun, eds. 641–653.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
T’sao, Feng Fu. 1979. A functional study of topic in Chinese: The first step toward discourse analysis. Taipei: Student Book Company.Google Scholar
T’sou, Benjamin K. and Oi Yee Kwong. 2015. ‘Some basic and salient linguistic features across Chinese speech communities from a corpus linguistics perspective’. In Wang and Sun, eds. 601–614.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. and Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, William S. Y. and Chaofen Sun, eds. 2015. The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics. NY: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wee, Lian-Hee and Mingxing Li. 2015. ‘Modern Chinese phonology’. In Wang and Sun, eds. 474–490.Google Scholar
Whaley, Lindsay J. 1979. Introduction to typology: The unity and diversity of language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Xu, Liejiong. 2015. ‘Topic prominence’. In Wang and Sun, eds. 393–403.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi. 2015. ‘Intonation in Chinese’. In Wang and Sun, eds. 490–502.Google Scholar
Yang, Chin Long, Peter C. Gordon, and Randall Hendrick. 2006. ‘The comprehension of co-reference in Chinese discourse’. In Ping Li et al., eds. 257–267.Google Scholar
Yip, Virginia and Stephen Matthews. 2007. The bilingual child: Early development and language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, Linda Wai Ling. 1994. Cross-talk and culture in Sino-American communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Xiaonong and Wang Caiyu. 2015. ‘Tone’. In Wang and Sun, eds. 503–515.Google Scholar