This study examines the variation between the active and the bei passive in Mandarin Chinese from a probabilistic perspective. The variables considered include discourse continuity factors and adversity. Two different models were built for the active-agentless passive variation and the active-agentive passive variation. Four factors were found to have significant effect: agent thematicity, patient thematicity, adversity, and referential distance. In contrast, the effect of topic persistence and local environment is not significant. The accuracy of prediction for the active-agentless passive variation is significantly higher than the accuracy for the active-agentive passive variation. Overall, the bei passive, either agentless or agentive, is more likely to be chosen over its active counterpart, if it is adversative, has a non-thematic agent, a thematic patient, and a shorter referential distance for the patient.
2022. From Translationese to Emergent Irony: A Usage-Based Approach to Chinese Bèi Passive. In Concepts, Discourses, and Translations [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 357 ff.
Chen, Chen & Feng-hsi Liu
2020. L2 acquisition of thebeipassive in Mandarin Chinese: A constructionist approach. Chinese as a Second Language Research 9:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Wuyun, Saina
2020. A Centering Analysis of Discourse with Chinese Bei Passive. In Where Centering Meets Chinese Discourse, ► pp. 49 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.