Cover not available
Article published In:
Media Language and Discourse in Cultural China
Edited by Doreen D. Wu, Ming Liu and David C.S. Li
[Chinese Language and Discourse 13:1] 2022
► pp. 7–27

Rapport building by Chinese celebrities on Weibo and Facebook

 | Fuzhou University
ORCID logo | The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
The paper examines how Chinese celebrities build rapport with their followers on social media, with a comparison between the Chinese mainland (on Weibo) and Hong Kong (on Facebook) celebrities. Rapport building is conceptualized as language use in promoting social bonding and emotional involvement and as achieved via at least two aspects: use of relational acts and choice of interactional features. Twelve months of postings by twelve most-followed Weibo and Facebook celebrities from the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong in 2017 have been retrieved and analyzed. It is found that the prevalent relational acts commonly used by both Weibo and Facebook celebrities to build rapport with their followers include sharing information, retweeting information and directives, among others; and the commonly prevalent interactive features include the use of colloquialism, emoji & emoticons, and hashtags or @, and the like. Nonetheless, significant differences also exist in that while Weibo celebrities tend to use more acts of showing stance, Facebook celebrities use more acts of showing appreciation; Weibo celebrities tend to use more colloquialism, emoji & emoticons, and internet slang, Facebook celebrities tend to use more English codemixing and vernacular expressions. Finally, the paper concludes with a discussion and explanation of the commonalities and differences between Weibo and Facebook celebrities.
Keywords: Chinese celebrity discourse, rapport building, relational acts, interactional features, Facebook, Weibo
Article outline
  • 1.Sociolinguistic contexts of Hong Kong and mainland China in the internet age
  • 2.Relational work on social media
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Defining rapport and research dimensions
    • 3.2Data collection
    • 3.3Data coding
  • 4.Analysis of the data
    • 4.1Relational acts by Weibo and Facebook celebrities
    • 4.2Interactional features by Weibo and Facebook celebrities
  • 5.Discussion & conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.21031.lin
References (49)
References
Bedijs, K., G. Held & C. Maaß. 2014. Introduction: Face Work and Social Media. In Bedijs, K., G. Held & C. Maaß (Eds.). Face Work and Social Media (Vol. 21), pp. 9–28. LIT Verlag Münster.Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, P. & Blitvich, P. G. (Eds.) 2019. Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cao, Q. & Wu, D. 2017. Modern Chinese identities at the cross-roads, Critical Arts, 31(6):1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. & Yule, G. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chu, R. W., Fortunati, L., Law, P. & Yang, S. 2012. (ed.) Mobile Communication and Greater China. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daer, A. R., Hoffman, R., & Goodman, S. 2014. Rhetorical Functions of Hashtag Forms Across Social Media Applications. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on The Design of Communication CD-ROM – SIGDOC ’14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dainas, A. R. & Herring, S. C. 2021. Interpreting emoji pragmatics. In C. Xu, F. Yus & H. Haberland (ed.), Approaches to Internet Pragmatics, 107–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dayter, D. 2018. Self-praise online and offline: The hallmark speech act of social media?, Internet Pragmatics, 1(1): 184–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feng, W. & D. D. Wu. 2016. State-owned or otherwise: Dialogic construction of corporate identities on Sina Weibo[J]. Intercultural Communication Studies, XXV(2): 184–203.Google Scholar
Gao, Y., Wu, D. & Ma, J. 2019. 回归20年后香港与广州、北京的语言态度比较 (Language attitudes in Hong Kong compared with Guangzhou and Beijing), 《语言文字应用》 (Applied Linguistics), 1101: 39–50.Google Scholar
Herring, S. C., Das, A., & Penumarthy, S. 2005. CMC act taxonomy. [URL]
Hoffmann, C. R. & Bublitz, W. (ed.). 2017. Pragmatics of Social Media. Berlin:De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ilyas, S., & Khushi, Q. 2012. Facebook status updates: A speech act analysis. Academic Research International, 3(2): 500–507.Google Scholar
Kádár, D., Haugh, M., & Chang, W. 2013. Aggression in mainland Chinese and Taiwanese CMC discussion lists, Multingua, 33(3): 343–372.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, B. 2021. A study on how cultural and gender parameters affect emoticon distribution, usage and frequency in American and Japanese online discourse. In C. Xu, F. Yus & H. Haberland (ed.), Approaches to Internet Pragmatics, 287–320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lai, M. L. 2015. Power redistribution of languages in Hong Kong under a new national flag, Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 25(1):141–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Language Situation in China: 2005–2017. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Lee, C. 2014. Language choice and self-presentation on social media: The case of university students in Hong Kong. In P. Seargeant & C. Tagg (ed.), The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, 91–111. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, C. & D. D. Wu. 2018. Facework by global brands across Twitter and Weibo. Discourse, Context & Media, 261:32–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, David C. S. (1999). The functions and status of English in Hong Kong: A post-1997 update. English World-Wide, 20(1):67–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Multilingual Hong Kong: Languages, literacies, identities. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, M. A., & Bolander, B. 2014. Relational work and the display of multilingualism in two Facebook groups. In K. Bedijs, G. Held & C. Maaß (Eds.). Face Work and Social Media (Vol. 21) (pp. 157–191). LIT Verlag Münster.Google Scholar
Maíz-Arévalo, C. 2017. Getting “liked”. In C. R. Hoffmann & W. Bublitz (ed.), Pragmatics of Social Media, 575–606. Berlin:De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021. Humour and self-presentation on WhatsApp profile status. In C. Xu, F. Yus & H. Haberland (ed.), Approaches to Internet Pragmatics, 175–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, B. 1923. The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (ed.), The Meaning of Meaning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. pp. 296–336.Google Scholar
Nemer, D. 2016. Celebrities acting up: A speech act analysis in Tweets of famous people. Social Networking, 5 1, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, R. 2012. The linguistic self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags. Discourse & Communication, 6 (2), 181–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Sabater, C. 2019. Emoticons in relational writing practices on WhatsApp: Some reflections on gender. In P. Bou-Franch & P. G. Blitvich (Eds.), Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp.105–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, K. 2015. The pragmatics of hashtags: Inference and conversational style on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics. 811:8–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1979. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snow, D. B. 2004. Cantonese as Written Language: The Growth of a Written Chinese Vernacular. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
So, D. W. C. 2000. Achieving biliteracy and trilingualism without MOI-based bifurcation of the schools: A plea for third alternatives, in D. C. S. Li (ed.), Language and Education in Postcolonial Hong Kong, pp.9–33. Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. 2000. Rapport management: a framework for analysis. In H. Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures (pp.11–46). London: Continuum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Face (im)politeness and rapport. In H. Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory (2nd ed. pp.11–47). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Statista. 2019. Leading countries based on number of Facebook users as of January 2019 (in millions). Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 2005. Conversational style: analyzing talk among friends. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, D. & Chan, K. 2007. Multilingual mix in Hong Kong Advertising, pre- and post-1997, Asian Journal of Communication, 17(3): 300–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, D. & Li, C. 2018. Emotional branding on social media: A cross-cultural discourse analysis of global brands on Twitter and Weibo, in A. Curtis & R. Sussex (Eds.), Intercultural communication in Asia: Education, Language and Values, Springer. pp. 225–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, D. D., Li, C. & Feng, J. 2016. 新媒体的社会语言学研究：回顾与展望 (Sociolinguistic Studies of New Media： Review and Prospect), 《当代语言学》 (Contemporary Linguistics), 18(4): 514–531.Google Scholar
Wu, D. & Feng, W. 2015. Pragmatist, evangelist, or sensualist?: Emotional branding on Sina Weibo. In P. P. K. Ng & C. S. B. Ngai (Eds.), Role of Language and Corporate Communication in Greater China. Heidelberg: Springer. pp.225–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, D. & Lin, M. 2017. Relational acts and identity construction by Chinese celebrities on Weibo, in Chen, X. (Eds.), Politeness Phenomena across Chinese Genres, Sheffield, UK ; Bristol, CT: Equinox. pp. 119–134.Google Scholar
Xie, C. & Tong, Y. 2019. “Constructing ‘ordinariness’: An analysis of Jack Ma’s narrative identities on Sina Weibo.” In The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Elda Weizman, 179–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Z. & Wu, D. 2018. 中国内地与香港网络词语构造的共性与个性 (Morphological Characteristics of Netspeak: Commonalities and Differences across Hong Kong and Inland China), Journal of Chinese Sociolinguistics, (1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Yus, F. 2019. Multimodality in memes: A Cyberpragmatic Approach. In P. Bou-Franch & P. G. Blitvich (Eds.), Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp.105–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, M. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continnum.Google Scholar
Zhang, M. & Wu, D. D. 2018. A cross-cultural analysis of celebrity practice in microblogging, East Asian Pragmatics, 3(2):179–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhou, M. 2012. Historical review of the PRC’s minority/indigenous language policy and practice: nation-state building and identity construction, In G. H. Beckett and G. A. Postiglione (ed.), China’s Assimilationist Language Policy, New York: Routledge. pp. 18–30.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Aminu, PraiseGod & Innocent Chiluwa
2023. Reinventing identity and resistance ideology in protest narratives. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 11:2 ► pp. 200 ff. DOI logo
Gao, Shuang
2022. The online activism of mock translanguaging: Language style, celebrity persona, and social class in China. Discourse, Context & Media 47 ► pp. 100608 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.