Cover not available
Article published In:
Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 7:1 (2016) ► pp.66–104

Conceptual metonymies and metaphors behind the Five Phases

A case study of MU (WOOD), TU (EARTH) and JIN (METAL)

 | Beijing Foreign Studies University / Capital University of Economics and Business
This paper is based on an investigation of the Five Phases (五行, wuxing) in traditional Chinese thought within a cognitive linguistic framework. In analyzing three of the five concepts in the wuxing scheme, namely WOOD (木, mu), EARTH (土, tu) and METAL (金, jin), as recorded in ancient and modern Chinese, we attempt to find out (1) the conceptual metonymies and metaphors they have developed, (2) the similarities and differences between the three concepts in ancient and modern Chinese, and (3) the possible reasons for those similarities and differences and the implications they have for ancient and modern Chinese ways of cognizing the world. Our comparative analysis shows that while the semantic networks of the three concepts remain largely consistent from ancient to modern Chinese, those conceptual metaphors which are closely tied to the wuxing scheme are much less active in modern Chinese. On the whole it can be claimed that the ancient Chinese believed in the unity of Heaven and human and constructed the world based on three fundamental conceptual metaphors: “nature operates in accordance with WUXING”, “THE HUMAN BODY OPERATES IN ACCORDANCE WITH WUXING” and “SOCIETY OPERATES IN ACCORDANCE WITH WUXING”. Yet it seems that this belief in the unity of Heaven and human has weakened in the modern Chinese mind and modern Chinese people no longer rely on the wuxing scheme to understand the world.
Keywords: conceptual metaphor, the Five Phases, metonymy-metaphor continuum, conceptual metonymy
Published online: 4 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.7.1.03lan
References (52)
Barcelona, Antonio. 2000. “Introduction: The Cognitive Theory of Metaphor and Metonymy”. In Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective ed. by A. Barcelona, 1–30. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Clarifying and Applying the Notions of Metaphor and Metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics: An Update”. In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast ed. by R. Dirven and R. Pörings, 207–277. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cao, Xueqin, and E. Gao. 2001. A Dream of Red Mansions. Translated by X. Yang & G. Yang. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2002. “The Role of Domains in the Interpretation of Metaphors and Metonymies”. In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast ed. by R. Dirven and R. Pörings, 161–205. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirven, René. 2002. “Metonymy and Metaphor: Different Mental Strategies of Conceptualization”. In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast ed. by R. Dirven and R. Pörings, 75–111. Berlin, Germany/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 1996. “What’s Cognitive about Cognitive Linguistics?” In Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics ed. by E.H. Casad, 27–54. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goossens, Louis. 2002. “Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Expressions for Linguistic Action”. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast ed. by R. Dirven and R. Pörings, 349–377. Berlin, Germany / New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltan. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor”. In Metaphor and Thought ed. by A. Ortony, 202–251. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legge, James (trans). 1963. The I Ching: The Book of Changes. New York, NY: Dover Publicaitons.Google Scholar
(trans). 1992. The Four Books. Changsha: Hunan Publishing House.Google Scholar
Littlejohn, Ronnie. 2012. “Wuxing (Wu-hsing)”. In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy ed. by J. Feiser and B. Dowden. Retrieved March 10, 2015 from the World Wide Web: [URL].Google Scholar
Luo, Jingguo (trans). 2005. A Selection of Classical Chinese Essays from Guwenguanzhi. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Nie, Yaning, and Rong Chen. 2008. “Water Metaphors and Metonymies in Chinese: A Semantic Network”. Pragmatics & Cognition 161: 492–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, Günter. 2002. “How Metonymic Are Metaphors”. In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast ed. by R. Dirven and R. Pörings, 407–434. Berlin, Germany / New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, Günter, and Kövecses Zoltan. 1999. “Toward a Theory of Metonymy”. In Metonymy in Language and Thought ed. by K. Panther & G. Radden, 17–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, Shilin (trans). 1992. The Complete Works of Tao Yuanming. Hong Kong: Joint Publishing (Hong Kong) Company Limited.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R. 2001. Linguistics Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Yu, Ning. 2009. The Chinese Heart in a Cognitive Perspective: Culture, Body, and Language. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, Burton (trans). 1968. The Complete Works of Zhuang Tzu. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1997. Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Yuanchong (trans). 2013. 300 Tang Poems · Collected Works of Xu Yuanchong, vol.61. Beijing: Dolphin Books.Google Scholar
陈立中(1996)《阴阳五行与汉语词汇学》, 长沙：岳麓书社.Google Scholar
邓铁涛, 郑洪 (2008)中医五脏相关学说研究—从五行到五脏相关.中国工程科学 , 21, 7–13.Google Scholar
冯友兰 (1998)《中国哲学史新编》, 北京：人民出版社.Google Scholar
顾颉刚 (1982)《古史辩》第五册, 上海：上海人民出版社.Google Scholar
贾冬梅, 蓝纯 (2010) “Water”与“水”的认知词义对比分析.外语教学理论与实践, 31, 28–35.Google Scholar
(2012) 五行之水行背后的概念借代和隐喻.外语教学, 61, 19–23.Google Scholar
(2013a) 五行之土行背后的概念隐喻和借代.当代外语研究, 11, 20–25.Google Scholar
(2013b) 五行之火行背后的概念借代和隐喻.外国语, 51, 36–42.Google Scholar
(2013c) 五行之金行背后的概念隐喻和借代.山东外语教学, 61, 26–32.Google Scholar
(2015) 五行之木行背后的概念借代和隐喻.外语与翻译, 11, 36–41.Google Scholar
邝芷人 (1992)《阴阳五行及其体系》, 台北：文津出版社.Google Scholar
梁茼 (2008) 中医基础课程教学中五行学说的认知解读.江苏中医药, 101, 94–96.Google Scholar
罗竹风 (2001)《汉语大词典》, 上海：世纪出版集团, 汉语大词典出版社.Google Scholar
庞朴 (1988)《稂莠集》, 上海：上海人民出版社.Google Scholar
宋潇潇, 周昌乐 (2009)“东西”本义辩及换喻思维 (湖南大学学报.社会科学版), 31, 79–82.Google Scholar
谈云雷 (2003) 五行之说与文字.江苏技术师范学院学报, 31, 95–100.Google Scholar
项春雁, 郭全, 廖娟, 王淑阁, 杨宇飞, 冯运华 (2006)中医五行音乐结合音乐电针疗法对恶性肿瘤患者抑郁状态的影响.中华护理杂志, 111, 969–972.Google Scholar
徐传武 (1989) 与“五行说”有关的词语和典故.辞书研究, 51, 82–90.Google Scholar
徐文明 (2001) 论五行中的金.北京师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 21, 19–24.Google Scholar
殷寄明 (2006)《“说文解字”精读 》, 上海：复旦大学出版社.Google Scholar
余秀忠, 丁红杰 (2008)“五行”之“木”考.贺州学院学报, 21, 77–80.Google Scholar
(2009)“五行”之“火”考.百色学院学报, 11, 109–111.Google Scholar
周艺 (1989)“说文解字”中的阴阳五行说.中南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 21, 101–107.Google Scholar
庄梅云, 贾春华, 郭瑨, 杨晓媛, 伏书民, 朱丽颖 (2014) 基于原型范畴理论的五行原型认知研究——166名中医高校生问卷调查与分析.世界中医药, 111, 1451–1453, 1458. Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Wang, Xiaopeng, Shu-Chuan Chu & Jeng-Shyang Pan
2022. Five Phases Algorithm for Global Optimization. In Advances in Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing [Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 277], ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Lan, Chun & Dongmei Jia
2020. Conceptual metonymies and metaphors behindSHUI(WATER) andHUO(FIRE) in ancient and modern Chinese. Applied Linguistics Review 11:2 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.