Cognitive English Grammar

Günter Radden | University of Hamburg
René Dirven † | University of Duisburg-Essen
ISBN 9789027219039 (Eur) | EUR 110.00
ISBN 9781556196638 (USA) | USD 165.00
ISBN 9789027219046 (Eur) | EUR 33.00
ISBN 9781556196645 (USA) | USD 49.95
ISBN 9789027292339 | EUR 110.00/33.00*
| USD 165.00/49.95*
Google Play logo

Cognitive English Grammar is designed to be used as a textbook in courses of English and general linguistics. It introduces the reader to cognitive linguistic theory and shows that Cognitive Grammar helps us to gain a better understanding of the grammar of English. The notions of motivation and meaningfulness are central to the approach adopted in the book. In four major parts comprising 12 chapters, Cognitive English Grammar integrates recent cognitive approaches into one coherent model, allowing the analysis of the most central constructions of English. Part I presents the cognitive framework: conceptual and linguistic categories, their combination in situations, the cognitive operations applied to them, and the organisation of conceptual structures into linguistic constructions. Part II deals with the category of ‘things’ and their linguistic structuring as nouns and noun phrases. It shows how things are grounded in reality by means of reference, quantified by set and scalar quantifiers, and qualified by modifiers. Part III describes situations as temporal units of various layers: internally, as types of situations; and externally, as located relative to the time of speech and grounded in reality or potentiality. Part IV looks at situations as relational units and their structuring as sentences. Its two chapters are devoted to event schemas and space and metaphorical extensions of space.

Cognitive English Grammaroffers a wealth of linguistic data and explanations. The didactic quality is guaranteed by the frequent use of definitions and examples, a glossary of the terms used, overviews and chapter summaries, suggestions for further reading, and study questions. For the Key to Study Questions click here.

[Cognitive Linguistics in Practice, 2] 2007.  xiv, 374 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“Em suma, um livro imperdível para os que desejam fazer uma iniciação a um modelo descritivo cognitivo da gramática do inglês.”
“The usage-based approach of Cognitive English Grammar not only makes students see the relationship between thought and language, but also - and more importantly - changes their conception about language and grammar in general. As the book offers explanantions for exactly those areas of grammar which are typically difficult and confusing to learn [...], by the end of the textbook (and the course) students come to realize and understand that grammar is indeed meaningful, and this knowledge imparts them with a confidence that is very much needed for any university student either within or outside the EFL classroom.”
“By molding together major strands of cognitive linguistic theory - such as the Langackerian cognitive grammar, conceptual metaphor theory, mental space theory, and force dynamics among other - the authors have produced a textbook that represents an ideal balance between linguistic theory on the one hand, and selected areas of English grammar on the other hand.”
“This is a textbook which can be extremely useful for the teaching of cognitive grammar. It is focused on the grammar of the English language, but it uses all the important notions and research that form the core of cognitive linguistics as a discipline. Despite its purpose as a student textbook, it is extremely comprehensive, with a lot of detail and classifications which are very clearly presented with the help of tables, diagrams and summaries. [...] The result is excellent and unique. It is difficult to find drawbacks.”
“The biggest asset of this book is that up to now, it is the most comprehensive account of English grammar from a cognitive-linguistic perspective. It is well written, clearly structured, and extremely accessible. It is an excellent introductory work for students who would like to pursue cognitive linguistics studies and a valuable resource for researchers interested in studying various languages in the light of cognitive linguistics.”
“A real scholarly and pedagogical feat. It is by no means an easy task to bring together the various strands making up the thriving field of cognitive linguistics into a technically coherent and pedagogically efficient textbook in English descriptive grammar. If you are a lecturer in the subject and have long meant to use Ron Langacker’s Cognitive Grammar and other cognitive-linguistic approaches in your classes but have been held back so far by the need to reduce to course book size the sheer volume and the technical complexity of the specialized literature, this is the textbook you wanted: A systematic, student-friendly yet rigorous treatment of English descriptive grammar from a cognitive-linguistic perspective, rich in attractive illustrations and supplemented with a large number of exercises and study questions, for which a key is provided. I have used the book in my classes and it works. Absolutely recommended.”
“Radden and Dirven have produced an engaging and readable book that successfully addresses a very real need. Using notions of cognitive linguistics, it not only provides a revealing survey of English grammar but makes apparent the conceptual basis of grammatical structure. Despite its non-technical presentation, Cognitive English Grammar shows considerable technical sophistication, covering central topics in reasonable depth and offering some new descriptive insights. This text should prove both useful and illuminating.”
Cited by

Cited by 216 other publications

Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2021. The multimodal recycling machine: toward a cognitive-pragmatic theory of the text/image production. Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics 12:3  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Aguilar-Guevara, Ana, Bert Le Bruyn & Joost Zwarts
2014. Advances in weak referentiality. In Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 219],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017. Cultural Conceptualisations of irony in Greek. In Advances in Cultural Linguistics [Cultural Linguistics, ],  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2020. Intensification via figurative language. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9],  pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2023. Constructions in Verbal Irony Production: The Case of Rhetorical Questions. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought,  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Athanasopoulos, Panos & Emanuel Bylund
2013. Does Grammatical Aspect Affect Motion Event Cognition? A Cross‐Linguistic Comparison of English and Swedish Speakers. Cognitive Science 37:2  pp. 286 ff. DOI logo
Baeskow, Heike
2020. Prominence in Noun-to-Verb Conversion. In Complex Words,  pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Bagasheva, Alexandra
2014. Compound verbs in English and Bulgarian and the relativity debate. In Multilingual Cognition and Language Use [Human Cognitive Processing, 44],  pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Baicchi, Annalisa
2017. Emotions travelling across cultures. International Journal of Language and Culture 4:1  pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
Baicchi, Annalisa
2022. Kinaesthetic embodied schemas in emotion language. In Figurativity and Human Ecology [Figurative Thought and Language, 17],  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Ballesteros-Lintao, Rachelle, Maria Regina P. Arriero, Judith Ma. Angelica S. Claustro, Kristina Isabelle U. Dichoso, Selenne Anne S. Leynes, Maria Rosario R. Aranda & Jean Reintegrado-Celino
2016. Deontic meanings in Philippine contracts . International Journal of Legal Discourse 1:2  pp. 421 ff. DOI logo
Beekhuizen, Barend & Sandra A Thompson
2022. ‘Something that’s very American’: The interactional role of Light-Head Relative Clauses. Discourse Studies 24:2  pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Benczes, Réka
2015. “Cognitive Linguistics is fun”. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2  pp. 479 ff. DOI logo
Benczes, Réka
2019. Rhyme over Reason, DOI logo
Benczes, Réka, Kate Burridge, Farzad Sharifian & Keith Allan
2017. Cultural Linguistics and Ageing: What Naming Practices in Australian English Can Reveal About Underlying Cultural Conceptualisations. In Advances in Cultural Linguistics [Cultural Linguistics, ],  pp. 607 ff. DOI logo
Benhamlaoui, Maroua & Gabriela Adela Gánem-Gutiérrez
2022. A Classroom Application of Concept-Based Language Instruction (C-BLI). Language and Sociocultural Theory 9:1 DOI logo
Berg, Thomas
2016. The Semantic Structure of English and German Compounds: Same or Different?. Studia Neophilologica 88:2  pp. 148 ff. DOI logo
Bernabe, Jean
2012. Submorphémique et sémiophonie créole. Miranda :7 DOI logo
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2017. On constructional blocking of metonymies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2017. Chapter 5. How metonymy and grammar interact. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],  pp. 126 ff. DOI logo
Brenda, Maria
2016. The grammar and semantics of near. CogniTextes 14:Volume 14 DOI logo
Brenda, Maria
2017. A cognitive perspective on the semantics of near . Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Bromhead, Helen
2011. The Bushin Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 31:4  pp. 445 ff. DOI logo
Bromhead, Helen
2022. Tensions in talking about disasters: Habitual versus climate-informed – The case of bushfire vocabulary in Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics 42:3-4  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Brown, Derek J.
2015. Approaching the Grammatical Count/Mass Distinction From a Multimodal Perspective. TESOL Quarterly 49:3  pp. 601 ff. DOI logo
Browse, Sam
2014. Chapter 5. Resonant metaphor in Kazuo Ishiguro’sNever Let Me Go. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Brucale, Luisa & Egle Mocciaro
2016. The embodied sources of purpose expressions in Latin. In Embodiment in Latin Semantics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 174],  pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Bui, Hung Phu
2022. Vietnamese EFL Students’ Use and Misconceptions of Cohesive Devices in Writing. SAGE Open 12:3  pp. 215824402211269 ff. DOI logo
Bylund, Emanuel, Pascal Gygax, Steven Samuel & Panos Athanasopoulos
2020. Back to the future? The role of temporal focus for mapping time onto space. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 73:2  pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
2011. L2 effects on L1 event conceptualization. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14:1  pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
2019. The use ofheapsas quantifier and intensifier in New Zealand English. English Language and Linguistics 23:3  pp. 531 ff. DOI logo
Carbone, Andrea Libero
2023. Aristotle’s Logic of Biological Diversity. Apeiron 56:3  pp. 621 ff. DOI logo
Cetnarowska, Bozena
2022. Chapter 5. Paradigm families in compounding. In Paradigms in Word Formation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 225],  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Chang, Feng-Ru
2019. An examination of the self-presentation of the top five franchised English buxibans in Taiwan. Research in Comparative and International Education 14:4  pp. 450 ff. DOI logo
Chrispin, Lucy & Lise Fontaine
Christou, Spyros, Llorenç Andreu, Carmen Julia Coloma, Ernesto Guerra, Claudia Araya, Javier Rodriguez-Ferreiro & Monica Sanz-Torrent
2022. Insights from real-time comprehension of Spanish verbal tense in children with developmental language disorder: An eye-tracking study. Applied Psycholinguistics 43:3  pp. 641 ff. DOI logo
Cuadrado Esclápez, Georgina
Danylchenko, Iryna, Yana Zhovinsky, T. Andrienko, S. Potapenko & L. Slavova
2021. Construction as basic translation unit: A case of referring to blind people in English and Ukrainian. SHS Web of Conferences 105  pp. 03003 ff. DOI logo
De Knop, Sabine
2010. German constructions with complex prepositional groups introduced by bis. CogniTextes 5:Volume 5 DOI logo
De Knop, Sabine
2020. From construction grammar to embodied construction practice. Constructions and Frames 12:1  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
De Knop, Sabine
2022. From construction grammar to embodied construction practice. In Construction Grammar across Borders [Benjamins Current Topics, 122],  pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
De Knop, Sabine
2024. The Integration of Frequency Dimensions and Lexicalisation Preferences in Contrastive Analysis. In Constructional and Cognitive Explorations of Contrastive Linguistics,  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
DENİZER, Faik Utkan
2023. KARŞIOLGUSAL VE HAYALÎ KOŞUL CÜMLELERİ ÜZERİNE. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi (HÜTAD) DOI logo
Denroche, Charles
2021. The Three Grammars and the sign. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:1  pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C.
2018. Does the passé composé influence L2 learners’ use of English past tenses?. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:1  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Dichtel, Frédéric
2016. A quantifier used on many occasions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:1  pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Dolgova, Natalia & Andrea Tyler
2019. Applications of Usage-Based Approaches to Language Teaching. In Second Handbook of English Language Teaching [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dolgova, Natalia & Andrea Tyler
2019. Applications of Usage-Based Approaches to Language Teaching. In Second Handbook of English Language Teaching [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ],  pp. 939 ff. DOI logo
Drożdż, Grzegorz
Druzhinin, Andrei Sergeevich & Svetlana Andreevna Pesina
2018. ORIENTATIONAL FUNCTION OF THE ENGLISH ARTICLE. Philology. Theory & Practice :4  pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Duffley, Patrick
2024. The scope of the problems with the problem of scope. Folia Linguistica 58:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Evans, Vyvyan
2012. Cognitive linguistics. WIREs Cognitive Science 3:2  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Fabiszak, Malgorzata, Anna Hebda, Iwona Kokorniak & Karolina Krawczak
2014. The semasiological structure of Polish myśleć ‘to think’. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43],  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Farsi, Roghayeh
2019. Positioning Strategies and Representation in Fictional Autobiography: The Sense of an Ending . Anglia 137:1  pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Fonteyn, Lauren & Charlotte Maekelberghe
Franceschi, Daniele
2014. Licensing and blocking factors in the use of BEGIN verbs. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:2  pp. 304 ff. DOI logo
Furumoto, Hideharu
2022. Misuse and Misunderstanding of Classifiers in Alzheimerʼs Disease. Higher Brain Function Research 42:4  pp. 433 ff. DOI logo
Gardelle, Laure
2017. Are superordinates such as furniture and belongings collective nouns?. Lingvisticae Investigationes 40:2  pp. 150 ff. DOI logo
Gatambuki Gathigia, Moses, Ruth W. Ndung’u & Daniel Ochieng Orwenjo
2015. When romantic love in Gĩkũyũ becomes a human body part. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 2:1  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Ghesquière, Lobke
2021. “A Good Deal of Intensity”: On the Development of Degree and Quantity Modifier Good. Journal of English Linguistics 49:2  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Ghio, Gilbert
2014. Temporalité et aspectualité en anglais : opérations, représentations, cognition. Corela :12-1 DOI logo
Giovanelli, Marcello
Glynn, Dylan
2022. Chapter 8. Emergent categories. In Analogy and Contrast in Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 73],  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Grisot, Cristina
2018. The Linguistic Expression of Temporal Reference. In Cohesion, Coherence and Temporal Reference from an Experimental Corpus Pragmatics Perspective [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, ],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Grisot, Cristina, Bruno Cartoni & Jacques Moeschler
Grisot, Cristina & Jacques Moeschler
2014. How Do Empirical Methods Interact with Theoretical Pragmatics? The Conceptual and Procedural Contents of the English Simple Past and Its Translation into French. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 2],  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Grisot, Cristina & Juan Sun
2021. Translating verbal tenses between tensed and tenseless languages. In Time in Languages, Languages in Time [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 101],  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Guerrero Medina, Pilar
2020. Meaning construction and motivation in the English benefactive double object construction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1  pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Gánem-Gutiérrez, Gabriela Adela & Haliza Harun
2011. Verbalisation as a mediational tool for understanding tense-aspect marking in English: an application of Concept-Based Instruction. Language Awareness 20:2  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
2021. Yoga instructions in Polish and Russian as directive speech acts: a cognitive linguistic perspective. Language and Cognition 13:4  pp. 613 ff. DOI logo
Hamawand, Zeki
2023. The Cognitive Framework. In English Stylistics,  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Hamilton, Craig A.
2014. Chapter 13. The cognitive poetics ofif. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Harrison, Chloe
Harrison, Chloe, Louise Nuttall, Peter Stockwell & Wenjuan Yuan
2014. Chapter 1. Introduction: Cognitive Grammar in literature. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hart, Christopher
2015. VIEWPOINT IN LINGUISTIC DISCOURSE. Critical Discourse Studies 12:3  pp. 238 ff. DOI logo
Hart, Christopher & Bodo Winter
2022. Gesture and legitimation in the anti-immigration discourse of Nigel Farage. Discourse & Society 33:1  pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Harun, Haliza, Norhana Abdullah, Nursyuhada’ Ab Wahab & Nurkhamimi Zainuddin
2019. Concept Based Instruction: Enhancing Grammar Competence in L2 Learners. RELC Journal 50:2  pp. 252 ff. DOI logo
Herbst, Thomas & Peter Uhrig
2020. The issue of specifying slots in argument structure constructions in terms of form and meaning. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34  pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Hledíková, Hana & Magda Ševčíková
2024. Conversion in languages with different morphological structures: a semantic comparison of English and Czech. Morphology 34:1  pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Ho-Cheong Leung, Alex & Wim van der Wurff
2018. Chapter 6. Anaphoric reference in Early Modern English. In The Noun Phrase in English [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 246],  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Hussein, Yusra A.
2023. A Semantic Study of Intensifiers . Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities 30:4, 1  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
2018. Moving along paths in space and time. Journal of Linguistics 54:4  pp. 721 ff. DOI logo
Infante, Paolo & Matthew E. Poehner
2022. Mediated Development: A Nexus of Dialogic and Material Mediation in the Second Language Classroom. In New Perspectives on Material Mediation in Language Learner Pedagogy [Educational Linguistics, 56],  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Jahan, Akhter & Judit Kormos
2015. The impact of textual enhancement on EFL learners' grammatical awareness of future plans and intentions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 25:1  pp. 46 ff. DOI logo
Jurado, Alejandro Barrena
2018. A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters. Lexis :14 DOI logo
Kaleta, Agnieszka
2020. Conceptualizing Modality: A Case Study of Polish Modal Verbs. In Cultural Conceptualizations in Language and Communication [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],  pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Kang, Ji-in & Iksoo Kwon
Karczewski, Daniel
2022. Two Approaches to Generics: Some Pedagogical Implications. In Wissenschaften und ihr Dialog,  pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Kermer, Franka
2020. A Cognitive Grammar Perspective on Temporal Conceptualization in SLA. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 55:s1  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Kermer, Franka
2023. The semantic mapping of the German spatial preposition JENSEITS . Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:2  pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Khor, Su Yin
2020. Definiteness, Grammatical. In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kleinke, Sonja & Birte Bös
Kokorniak, Iwona
2022. Chapter 5. Contrast and analogy in aspectual distinctions of English and Polish. In Analogy and Contrast in Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 73],  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Kokorniak, Iwona & Malgorzata Fabiszak
2014. Grammaticalization of Polish mental predicate prefixes. In Grammaticalization – Theory and Data [Studies in Language Companion Series, 162],  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Kokorniak, Iwona & Alicja Jajko-Siwek
2018. Expressing i think that in Polish. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:1  pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Kong, Lingcui & Niyun Lu
2022. English Tense Teaching in Secondary Schools Based on the Perspective of Embodied-Cognitive Linguistics. International Journal of Education and Humanities 6:1  pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Kwiatkowska, Alina
Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer
2020. Complex Words, DOI logo
Lahey, Ernestine
2015. remember and forget in Dan Brown’s Angels and Demons: A corpus-informed account. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 24:4  pp. 292 ff. DOI logo
Langacker, Ronald W.
2014. Foreword. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. xiii ff. DOI logo
Lapaire, Jean-Rémi
2017. Grammaire cognitive des prépositions : épistémologie et applications. Corela :HS-22 DOI logo
Lapaire, Jean-Rémi
2017. Verbes et constructions verbales en grammaire cognitive : la prédication autrement. Corela :HS-22 DOI logo
Li, Ke , Xingwei Miao & Gisela Redeker
2023. The Mediatisation of the Chinese Dama in Chinese English-Language Media: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach . Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 93  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
2012. Grammar Dilemma: Teaching Grammar as a Resource for Making Meaning. The Modern Language Journal 96:2  pp. 270 ff. DOI logo
Littlemore, Jeannette
2023. ‘Loud Suits’ and ‘Sharp Cheese’: Motivated Language, Iconicity, and Second Language Learning. In Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching,  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Dilin & Lei Lei
2017. Teaching Location in Time and Other Metaphorical Senses. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Dilin & Hongwei Zhan
2015. The Use of the -Free Compound and Free of and Free From Phrasal Constructions. Journal of English Linguistics 43:3  pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Dilin & Hongwei Zhan
2018. Teaching Prepositions and Particles. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Maekelberghe, Charlotte & Liesbet Heyvaert
2016. Indefinite Nominal Gerunds, or the Particularization of a Reified Event. English Studies 97:3  pp. 317 ff. DOI logo
Mair, Christian
2012. Forms and Structures. In English and American Studies,  pp. 413 ff. DOI logo
Martirosyan, Anush
Mazurkiewicz-Sokołowska, Jolanta
2023. Versuch einer Reaktivierung des semantischen Netzwerks als Werkzeug zur Ermittlung der kognitiven Mechanismen bei der Bedeutungsbildung am Beispiel der Präposition an. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 53:1  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Miró-Sastre, Ignasi
2018. Combining Metaphors: From Metaphoric Amalgams to Binary Systems. Australian Journal of Linguistics 38:1  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Mohammed, Frmesk Muslih & Mohsen Ahmed Omar
2024. The Construal Operation and Mechanism of Focusing in Jamal Jabar Gharib’s Novels: A Cognitive Criticism Study. JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE STUDIES 8:3  pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Mori, Souma
2019. A Cognitive Analysis of the PrepositionOVER: Image-schema transformations and metaphorical extensions. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 64:3  pp. 444 ff. DOI logo
Morras, Javier & Antonio Barcelona
Nagy, Gábor Tolcsvai
2020. The application of functional cognitive linguistic pedagogy under the conditions of linguistic minorities. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 71:3  pp. 373 ff. DOI logo
Neary, Clara
2014. Chapter 8. Profiling the flight of ‘The Windhover’. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Newby, David
2015. The role of theory in pedagogical grammar: A Cognitive + Communicative approach. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics 1:2  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Nuttall, Louise
2014. Chapter 6. Constructing a text world for The Handmaid’s Tale. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Oakley, Todd
2014. Afterword: From Cognitive Grammar to systems rhetoric. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Omero, Paolo, Massimiliano Valotto, Riccardo Bellana, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni, Andrzej Zuczkowski & Carlo Tasso
2020. Writer’s uncertainty identification in scientific biomedical articles: a tool for automatic if-clause tagging. Language Resources and Evaluation 54:4  pp. 1161 ff. DOI logo
O’Connell, Daniel C. & Sabine Kowal
2012. An Empirical Search for Genres of Spoken Discourse. In Dialogical Genres,  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Paradis, Carita
2012. Cognitive Grammar. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, DOI logo
Paradis, Carita
2023. Cognitive Grammar. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Park, Chongwon
2013. Setting and location. Constructions and Frames 5:2  pp. 192 ff. DOI logo
Park, Chongwon
2014. Reference-point and blending in Korean non-nominative subject constructions. Studies in Language 38:4  pp. 717 ff. DOI logo
Patterson, Ashley N.
2016. ‘We'll be fine until our kid goes to school’: biraciality and discourse inTia & Tamera. Critical Discourse Studies 13:2  pp. 210 ff. DOI logo
Pałka, Patrycja & Agata Kwaśnicka-Janowicz
2019. Semantyka staropolskich terminów bartniczych – na przykładzie (po)łazić pszczoły/miód – w ujęciu kognitywnym. Studia z Filologii Polskiej i Słowiańskiej 54 DOI logo
Philip, Gill
2018. We can do without these words. In The Corpus Linguistics Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 87],  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Pincombe, Mike
Pleyer, Michael & Stefan Hartmann
2024. Cognitive Linguistics and Language Evolution, DOI logo
Pleyer, Michael & Christian W. Schneider
Poehner, Matthew E. & Paolo Infante
2017. Mediated Development: A Vygotskian Approach to Transforming Second Language Learner Abilities. TESOL Quarterly 51:2  pp. 332 ff. DOI logo
Polzenhagen, Frank
2022. Reconsidering accounts of the grammaticalization of auxiliaries. In Figurative Thought and Language in Action [Figurative Thought and Language, 16],  pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Päivärinta, Anne
Radden, Günter
2016. In Memoriam René Dirven. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2  pp. v ff. DOI logo
Roehr-Brackin, Karen, Gabriela Adela Gánem-Gutiérrez, Lexa Olivera-Smith & María Teresa Torres-Marín
2021. Are individual differences in cognitive abilities and stylistic preferences related to multilingual adults’ performance in explicit learning conditions?. Language Awareness 30:4  pp. 391 ff. DOI logo
Romain, Laurence, Adnane Ez-zizi, Petar Milin & Dagmar Divjak
2022. What makes the past perfect and the future progressive? Experiential coordinates for a learnable, context-based model of tense and aspect. Cognitive Linguistics 33:2  pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Romain, Laurence, Dagmar Hanzlíková, Petar Milin & Dagmar Divjak
2024. Ruled by construal?. Constructions and Frames 16:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Romano, Manuela
2017. Are similes and metaphors interchangeable?. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Romero Muñoz, Eloy
2022. Teaching Form in the Action-Oriented Classroom: Can-Do!. In English Language Teaching [English Language Teaching: Theory, Research and Pedagogy, ],  pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Romo Simón, Francisco
2015. La imagen metalingüística de ser y. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 28:1  pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Rotgé, Wilfrid
2014. Pourquoi la grammaire ? Pourquoi la grammaire anglaise à un public LANSAD ?. Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en langues de spécialité - Cahiers de l APLIUT :Vol. XXXIII N° 3  pp. 14 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. & Ignasi Miró Sastre
2019. On the cognitive grounding of agent-deprofiling constructions as a case of pretense constructions. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:2  pp. 573 ff. DOI logo
2016. Figurative and non-figurative motion in the expression of result in English. Language and Cognition 8:1  pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
Sabar, Nadav
2019. Using big data to support meaning hypotheses for some and any. In Columbia School Linguistics in the 21st Century [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 77],  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Sambre, Paul & Cornelia Wermuth
2015. Associative relations and instrumentality in causality. In Handbook of Terminology [Handbook of Terminology, 1],  pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Schulze, Rainer
2015. The Significance of ‘the Social’ in Contemporary Linguistics. In The Exercise of Power in Communication,  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Shanmuganathan, Thilagavathi
2021. Cultural Conceptualization of Tamil Hindu Marriages. International Journal of Language and Culture 8:2  pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Shannon, George J., James M. Levett, Steven M. Corns & Donald C. Wunsch
2017. 2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI),  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Skvortsova, Natalia Sergeyevna
2023. Mechanisms of conceptualisation of aspectual-temporal meanings of grammatical constructions. Philology. Theory & Practice 16:5  pp. 1505 ff. DOI logo
Smutný, Milan
2018. Terminology as a Specific Carrier of Information. Prague Journal of English Studies 7:1  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Soler Gallego, Silvia
2018. Audio descriptive guides in art museums. Translation and Interpreting Studies 13:2  pp. 230 ff. DOI logo
Song, Xin, Wolfgang Schnotz & Constanze Juchem-Grundmann
2015. A Cognitive Linguistic Approach to Teaching English Prepositions. In Multidisciplinary Research on Teaching and Learning,  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Stadnik, Katarzyna
2016. Linguistic Modality and Female Identity in Chaucer’s Clerk’s Tale. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 51:2  pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Stockwell, Peter
2014. Chapter 2. War, worlds and Cognitive Grammar. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Strauss, Susan, Heesun Chang & Jungwan Yoon
2018. Chapter 4. The speech went on (and on) as Kerry dozed off (*and off). In Language Learning, Discourse and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 64],  pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Strugielska, Ariadna & Katarzyna Piątkowska
Sudharshana, N. P.
2018. Reading Comprehension in ESL Contexts: An Applied Cognitive Semantics Perspective. In The Idea and Practice of Reading,  pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Sudharshana, N. P.
2021. From Cognitive Grammar to Pedagogic Grammar: Macrostrategies for Designing Form-Focused Tasks. In Task-Based Language Teaching and Assessment,  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Suñer, Ferran, Jörg Roche & Liesbeth Van Vossel
2023. Bodily engagement in the learning and teaching of grammar. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Szymański, Leszek
2021. A corpus-based analysis of the modalcanwith the perfect in American English from a synchronic and diachronic perspective. Studia Neophilologica 93:3  pp. 287 ff. DOI logo
Tabakowska, Elżbieta
Tabakowska, Elżbieta
2020. Levels of iconicity in classical and modern English-language haiku. In Operationalizing Iconicity [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 17],  pp. 154 ff. DOI logo
Taniguchi, T., D. Mochihashi, T. Nagai, S. Uchida, N. Inoue, I. Kobayashi, T. Nakamura, Y. Hagiwara, N. Iwahashi & T. Inamura
2019. Survey on frontiers of language and robotics. Advanced Robotics 33:15-16  pp. 700 ff. DOI logo
ten Wolde, Elnora & Evelien Keizer
2016. Structure and substance in functional discourse grammar: the case of the binominal noun phrase. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 48:1  pp. 134 ff. DOI logo
Torregrosa, G. & S. Sánchez-Reyes
2015. Raising Metaphor Awareness in English for Law Enforcement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 212  pp. 304 ff. DOI logo
Trim, Richard
2021. Poetic Symbols of Unlimited Time. Proceedings of the 14th World Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies (IASS/AIS) 6  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Tsakuwa, Mustapha Bala, Xu Wen & Ibrahim Lamido
2023. A chained metonymic approach toίdὸ‘eye’ constructional metonymies in Hausa. Cognitive Linguistics 34:2  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Tsang, Art
2017. Judgement of countability and plural marking in English by native and non-native English speakers. Language Awareness 26:4  pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Tsaroucha, Efthymia
2019. Figuration, constructions and English phrasal verbs: The instances of come up . ExELL 7:2  pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Tîrban, Emilian
2023. On the Efficiency and Efficacy of Machine-Assisted Literary Translation: A Case Study for English/Romanian and Romanian/English Machine-Assisted Translation. East-West Cultural Passage 23:2  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Ullmann, Stefanie
2019. Epistemic stancetaking and speaker objectification in a spatio-cognitive discourse world. Journal of Language and Politics 18:3  pp. 393 ff. DOI logo
Valdés Miyares, J. Rubén
2019. The Functions of Anglo-Saxon Poetry: An Old English Text Typology. English Studies 100:7  pp. 739 ff. DOI logo
Van Arkel-Simón, Carlos
2020. Estudio cualitativo de los procesos de gramaticalización, cambio construccional y construccionalización en las construcciones progresivas del inglés. Cuadernos de Investigación Filológica 48  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Vardi, Ruti
2015. ‘I’m dying on you’. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1  pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Vassilaki, Evgenia
2017. Chapter 4. Cognitive motivation in the linguistic realization of requests in Modern Greek. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],  pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
Verhulst, An & Liesbet Heyvaert
2015. Root Modal Uses ofShould, Ought toandBe Supposed toin Present-Day English: From Patterns and Profiles to Proficiency Guidelines. English Studies 96:5  pp. 562 ff. DOI logo
Vogiatzis, Anastasios
2022. Valenced Metaphors in Strategic Communication: The Case of the Greek Economic Crisis. International Journal of Strategic Communication 16:1  pp. 18 ff. DOI logo
Wadley, Phillip, Thora Tenbrink & Alan Wallington
2024. Moving Figures and Grounds in music description. Cognitive Linguistics 35:1  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Wallentin, Mikkel & Johanne S. K. Nedergaard
2023. Reframing self-talk in endurance sports using grammatical taxonomy. Cognitive Semiotics 16:2  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Wei, Jilan
2023. Kindness in British communities: Discursive practices of promoting kindness during the Covid pandemic. Discourse & Society 34:4  pp. 502 ff. DOI logo
Wen, Xu, Kun Yang & Fangtao Kuang
2014. Cognitive Linguistics. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1:2  pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Wiliński, Jarosław
2020. The preposition under and its noun collocates in the under-NOUN pattern: A quantitative corpus-based investigation. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :31(4)  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Wiliński, Jarosław
2021. Nouns in the Be of N-Construction: A Corpus-Based Investigation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 66:3  pp. 747 ff. DOI logo
Wiraszka, Łukasz
2023. Active verbs with inanimate, text-denoting subjects in Polish and English abstracts of research articles in linguistics. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 59:1  pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Wold, Stephanie Hazel
2019. PhD revisited: INGlish English. In English Didactics in Norway,  pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Xiang, Xuehua
2019. A comparative study of the restrictive markings of mandarin Jiù, Cái, and Zhǐ. In Columbia School Linguistics in the 21st Century [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 77],  pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Zhiguo
2012. The modal uses of de and temporal shifting in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21:4  pp. 387 ff. DOI logo
Xing, Xiaoyu, Yubo Zhang & Lifang Chen
2015. Cognitive Grounding and Its Adaptability to Chinese Noun Studies. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5:2  pp. 336 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Xinhui & Hongwei Zhan
2022. Narrating the Past in Different Contexts: C-BI Approach to the Present Perfect and Past Simple. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 45:4  pp. 566 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Li-Chin
2023. The effects of a cognitive linguistic approach on college students’ learning English tenses in Taiwan. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Yuan, Wenjuan
2014. Chapter 12. Fictive motion in Wordsworthian nature. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Zhan, Hongwei
2017. Zhang, N. (2015). Cognitive Chinese grammar . Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Keding
2014. A Cognitive Grammar approach to the SLocPAdjC in Mandarin Chinese. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1:2  pp. 218 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Helen & Jason Fan
2021. Modeling Input Factors in Second Language Acquisition of the English Article Construction. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Zwarts, Joost
2014. Functional frames in the interpretation of weak nominals. In Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 219],  pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Šćepanović, Sandra
2024. Temporal clauses with the present indicative negated by μή in Ancient Greek. Glotta 100:1  pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2008. PUBLICATIONS RECEIVED. English Language and Linguistics 12:1  pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2014. List of contributors. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. vii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Acknowledgements. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. xi ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. References. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Index. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2023. Irony in Linguistic Communication. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought,  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.


Main BIC Subject

CFK: Grammar, syntax

Main BISAC Subject

LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2007012165 | Marc record