Cover not available
Article published In:
Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 11:2 (2024) ► pp.440–458

A cognitive modelling of translation

A construal-based perspective

 | Southwest University
This paper attempts to usher in a cognitive linguistic theory into (cognitive) translation studies and offers a theoretical model of translation from the construal perspective. In this construal-based theory, translators are modelled as construers which are featured by subjectivity, and meaning decoding and encoding in translation are equated with construal which is manifested at two levels. At the cognitive level, translators construe the source text whereas at the linguistic level the construal established by the translators is packaged in the target language. Translation process involves translators’ construal operations such as perspective, selection, prominence and dynamicity, and imagination. Since construal is situated in context, it is impossible to recreate the construals of the source text author but optimal construal can be envisioned if the situated contexts for the source text author(s) as well as that for the target text are best accommodated.
Keywords: construal, construal operations, cognitive translation studies, optimal construal
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The construal theory
    • 2.1Construal characterized
    • 2.2Construal operations
  • 3.Translators as construers
  • 4.Meaning decoding/encoding in translation as construal
  • 5.Construal operations in translation process
  • 6.Equivalence vs. optimal construal
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 October 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00125.tao
References (37)
References
Baker, M. (2018). In other words: A coursebook on translation (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1965). A linguistic theory of translation: An essay in applied linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2012). Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, V. (2007). A glossary of cognitive linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Halverson, S. L. (2007). A cognitive linguistic approach to translation shifts. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 21 (1), 105–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Implications of cognitive linguistics for translation studies. In A. Rojo & I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and translation: Advances in some theoretical models and applications (pp. 33–74). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1959). On linguistic aspects of translation. In R. A. Brower (Ed.), On translation (pp. 232–239). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Koller, W. (1979). Einführung in die Übersetzungswissenschaft [Introduction to translation studies]. Heidelberg Wiesbaden: Quelle und Meyer.Google Scholar
(1989). Equivalence in translation theory. In A. Chesterman (Ed.), Readings in translation theory (pp. 99–104). Helsinki: Finn Lectura.Google Scholar
(1995). The concept of equivalence and the object of translation studies. Target, 7 (2), 191–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol I: Theoretical prerequisite. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(1999). Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Cognitive grammar. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 421–462). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2019). Construal. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics – Foundations of Language (pp. 140–166). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muñoz Martín, R. (2010). On paradigms and cognitive translatology. In G. M. Shreve & E. Angelone (Eds.), Translation and cognition (pp. 169–187). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Processes of what models?: On the cognitive indivisibility of translation acts and events. Translation Spaces, 5 (1), 145–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Looking toward the future of cognitive translation studies. In J. W. Schwieter & A. Ferreira (Eds.), The handbook of translation and cognition (pp. 555–572). New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nida, E. A. (1964). Towards a science of translating: With special reference to principles and procedures involved in Bible translating. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nida, E. A., & Taber, C. R. (1969). The theory and practice of translation. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pym, A. (2007). Natural and directional equivalence in theories of translation. Target, 19 (2), 271–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Exploring translation theories. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rojo, A., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013). Cognitive linguistics and translation: Advances in some theoretical models and applications. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabakowska, E. (1993). Cognitive linguistics and poetics of translation. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1988). The relation of grammar to cognition. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 165–205). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Vol I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Verhagen, A. (2007). Construal and perspectivization. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 48–81). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wen, X. (2007). yǔyì, rènzhī yǔ shíjiě [Meaning, cognition and construal]. Foreign Language Research, (6), 35–39.Google Scholar
Wen, X., & Xiao, K. (2019). rènzhīfānyìxué [Cognitive translatology]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Xiao, K. (2021). rènzhīfānyìxué de míng yǔ shí [The name and nature of cognitive translation studies]. Studies in Language, Translation & Cognition (1), 102-121+168-169.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (1984). hànyīng duìzhào tángshī yībǎiwǔshí shǒu [One hundred and fifty Tang-dynasty poems in Chinese and English compared]. Xian: Shaanxi Peoples’ Publishing House.Google Scholar
(2021). xǔyuānchōng yì táoyuānmíng shīxuǎn [Selected poems of Tao Yuanming]. Beijing: China Translation & Publishing House.Google Scholar
Zhao, Z. (1986). Lǐbái jìngyèsī yīngyì shǎngxī [Appreciation of Li Bai’s quatrain “ Quiet Night Thoughts” In English translation]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, (4), 15–18.Google Scholar