Cover not available
Article published In:
Concentric
Vol. 48:2 (2022) ► pp.249–284

Expressing the existence of an event with ‘you (to have) + VP’ in Taiwan Mandarin

A corpus-based investigation

 | National Taiwan Normal University
 | National Taiwan Normal University
The verb you ‘to have’ in standard Mandarin is typically followed by a noun. You can also take a VP as its complement (‘you + VP’) in several varieties of Mandarin. However, the function associated with it is still under debate: ‘you + VP’ has been analyzed as expressing past tense, perfective aspect, perfect aspect, or realis mood. This paper assesses these analyses by conducting a corpus-based investigation of ‘you + VP’ on the PTT platform and by looking at different morphosyntactic environments in which it is used. The data favor analyzing ‘you + VP’ as expressing an assertive modality meaning (the situation is considered true in the real world by the speaker). This analysis corroborates with the high frequency of ‘you + VP’ in assertive environments (e.g., after factual verbs in embedded clauses, with attitudinal adverbs of truth value, among others). Conversely, taking ‘you + VP’ as indicating past tense or perfective aspect is challenged by the present data, and the perfect aspect analysis cannot explain all the environments in which ‘you + VP’ is used. This paper provides new insights regarding the morphosyntactic use of ‘you + VP’ and sheds light on the meaning this construction encodes.
Keywords: Taiwan Mandarin, ‘you + VP’, corpus linguistics, assertive modality, Tense-Aspect-Modality, syntax
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.‘You + VP’: Between tense, aspect and modality
    • 2.1Theoretical background: Definitions
    • 2.2‘You + VP’ as expressing past tense
    • 2.3‘You + VP’ as expressing aspect: Between perfective and perfect
      • 2.3.1‘You + VP’ as indicating perfective aspect
      • 2.3.2‘You + VP’ as indicating existential perfect aspect
    • 2.4‘You + VP’ as expressing realis mood, factuality or assertive modality
    • 2.5Interim summary
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Frequency profiles of the distribution of the ‘you + VP’ construction
    • 4.1Clause types
    • 4.2Adverbs and adverbial phrases
      • 4.2.1Time adverbs
      • 4.2.2Aspect adverbs
      • 4.2.3Attitudinal adverbs
      • 4.2.4Other types of adverb
    • 4.3Aspect and modal markers
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1The auxiliary verb you ‘to have’ is not a past tense marker
    • 5.2The primary function of ‘you + VP’ is not to express aspectual distinctions
      • 5.2.1‘You + VP’ does not primarily express perfective aspect
      • 5.2.2Is the ‘you + VP’ construction marking existential perfect aspect?
    • 5.3‘You + VP’ as an assertive modal construction
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • List of abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 29 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.21046.col
References (61)
References
Bhat, D. N. Shankara. 1999. The Prominence of Tense, Aspect, and Mood. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biq, Yung-O, and Chu-Ren Huang. 2016. Adverbs. A Reference Grammar of Chinese, ed. by Chu-Ren Huang and Dingxu Shi, 315–352. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boulin, Myriam. 2017. Now and xianzai: A contrastive study of two deictic adverbs. Language in Contrast 17.1:1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouscaren, Janine. 1991. Linguistique Anglaise – Initiation à une Grammaire de L’énonciation [English Linguistics – Introduction to an Utterance-centered Grammar]. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Bouscaren, Janine, and Jean Chuquet. 1987. Grammaire et Textes Anglais – Guide pour L’analyse Linguistique [English Grammar and Texts – Toolkit for Linguistic Analysis]. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Brooks, Joseph Daniel. 2018. Realis and irrealis: Chini verb morphology, clause chaining, and discourse. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Cai, Ya-wen. 2011. Syntax and Semantics of You + VP in Taiwan Mandarin. MA thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei.
Chen, Xiuwen, and Claire Saillard. 2011. Prospective and posterior aspect in Mandarin Chinese: On the aspectual value of modals yao and hui . Paper presented at the 7th Conference of the European Association of Chinese Linguistics (EACL-7), Ca’Foscari University, Venice.
Chen, Yamuna. 2010. The Temporal and Aspectual Properties of the “You + VP” Construction in Mandarin Chinese. MA thesis, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Cheng, Robert Liang-Wei. 1997. Tense interpretation of four Taiwanese modal verbs. Taiwanese and Mandarin Structures and Their Development Trends in Taiwan: Temporal and Spatial Relations, Questions and Negatives in Taiwanese and Mandarin, vol. 31, 19–36. Taipei, Yuan-Liu.Google Scholar
Cheng, Ying. 2004. Hanyu ‘you’ de yufahua [The grammaticalization of ‘you’ in Mandarin]. Journal of National Hsinchu Teacher’s College 111:163–202.Google Scholar
Chung, Siaw-Fong, Meng-Hsien Shih, Hui-Wen Liu, Chi-ling Lee, and Yueh-hui Vanessa Chiang. 2021. The use of hēi diào (‘to turn black’) and its related [V diào] forms in social media: A corpus-based study. International Review of Pragmatics 13.2:125–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collart, Aymeric. 2018a. When time is a fact: A semantic and time-relational analysis of ‘You + VP’ in Taiwan Mandarin. Paper presented at the 19th Chinese Lexical Semantics Workshop (CLSW-19), National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan.
. 2018b. Same interpretation, different process? The case of verbal -le and You + VP in Taiwan Mandarin. Paper presented at the joint conference 17th International Conference on the Processing of East Asian Languages and 9th Conference on Language, Discourse, and Cognition (ICPEAL 17 – CLDC 9), National Taiwan University, Taipei.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gärtner, Uta. 2005. Is the Myanmar language really tenseless? Studies in Burmese Linguistics, ed. by Justin Watkins, 105–124. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Giridhar, Puttushetra Puttuswamy. 1994. Mao Naga Grammar. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Givón, T.. 2001. Syntax: An Introduction, vol. 11. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iljic, Robert. 2009. Grammaticalization of the notion of ‘passing’ in Chinese (aspectual values). Bulletin of SOAS 72.3:513–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Holisticity, discontinuity, class in Chinese aspect. Language Research 46.2:147–198.Google Scholar
Jing, Sun. 2005. A Study on “You + VP” Structure in Mandarin Chinese. MA Thesis, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Khoo, Yong Kang, and Jingxia Lin. 2020. A corpus-based investigation of yŏu in Singapore Mandarin: The case for an existential perfect marker. From Minimal Contrast to Meaning Construct, ed. by Qi Su and Weidong Zhan, 101–118. Beijing: Peking University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in Language. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Chris Wen-Chao. 2004. Conflicting notions of language purity: The interplay of archaizing, ethnographic, reformist and xenophobic purism in the perception of Standard Chinese. Language & Communication 24.2:97–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Jo-Wang. 2007. Predicate restriction, discontinuity property and the meaning of the perfective marker guo in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 16.3:237–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Chin-Ting Jimbo. 2011. Motivations for grammaticalization: A case study of the realis marker you in Taiwan Mandarin. Paper presented at the 12th Chinese Lexical Semantics Workshop (CLSW-11), National Taiwan University, Taipei.
Liu, Chin-Ting Jimbo, and Li-mei Chen. 2017. Processing conjunctive entailment of disjunction. Language and Linguistics 18.2:269–295.Google Scholar
Liu, Tsun-Jui. 2014. PTT Corpus: Construction and Applications. MA thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei.
Liu, Tsun-Jui, Shu-Kai Hsieh, and Laurent Prévot. 2013. Observing features of PTT neologisms: A corpus-driven study with N-gram model. Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Conference on Computational Linguistics and Speech Processing (ROCLING 2013), ed. by Jui-Feng Yeh, 250–259. Kaohsiung: The Association for Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing (ACLCLP).Google Scholar
Lock, Graham. 1989. Aspects of variation and change in the Mandarin Chinese spoken in Singapore. Australian Journal of Linguistics 9.2:277–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, vol. 21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Monica. 1996. A Grammar of Chalcatongo Mixtec. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev. 2014. The Nanti reality status system: Implications for the typological validity of the realis/irrealis contrast. Linguistic Typology 18.2:251–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Okell, John. 1969. A Reference Grammar of Burmese. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 2001. Mood and Modality (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm, and Stacy Fang-ching Teng. 2005. Formosan languages and linguistic typology. Language and Linguistics 6.4:730–781.Google Scholar
Shyu, Shu-ing. 2016. Information structure. A Reference Grammar of Chinese, ed. by Chu-Ren Huang and Dingxu Shi, 518–576. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shyu, Shu-ing, and Ya-chun Chuang. 2015. Approximating to the event boundary, (counter)factuality and approximative cha(yi)dian . Analyzing Language as Material, ed. by Ming-Yu Tseng, 97–120. Kaohsiung: National Sun Yat-sen University press.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S. 1997. The Parameter of Aspect (2nd edition). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8.2:209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1.1:1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, Ting-Chi, Shu-Min Chang, and Yuan-Ping Liao. 2010. Taiwan bentu yuyan yufa yanjiu de guiji: Fulaoyu pian [A study of the research history for the grammar of Taiwanese languages: Southern-Min dialects]. Journal of Taiwanese Languages and Literature 5.2:81–102.Google Scholar
Teng, Shou-hsin. 2002. Defining Taiwanese Mandarin. Education and Society in Plurilingual Contexts, ed. by Daniel W. C. So and Gary M. Jones, 230–240. Brussels: VUB Brussels University Press.Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2002. You ‘have’ in Taiwan Mandarin and dialects – on the social and historical aspects of grammatical theories. Tsinghua Journal of Chinese Studies 32.2:495–528.Google Scholar
Tsao, Feng-fu. 1998. Taiwan Minnanyu zhong yu shimao youguan de yuci ‘u’, ‘φ’ he ‘a’ shixi [On Three Aspect – Related Morphemes u, φ and a in Taiwanese Southern Min]. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 28.3:299–334.Google Scholar
Tsao, Feng-fu, and Ying Cheng. 1995. Tan Minnanyu ‘u’ de wuzhong yongfa ji qijian de guanxi [The five usages of u in Taiwanese Southern Min and their relation]. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 111:155–168.Google Scholar
Tseng, Hsin-I. 2003. The Syntax Structures of Contemporary Taiwanese Mandarin. MA thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
Vittrant, Alice. 2005. Burmese as a modality-prominent language. Studies in Burmese Linguistics, ed. by Justin Watkins, 143–161. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Wang, Wen-jet, Chia-jung Chen, Chia-ming Lee, Chien-yu Lai, and Hsin-hung Lin. 2019. Articut: Chinese Word Segmentation and POS Tagging System (Version 1.0.8) [R package]. Retrieved December 10, 2019, from [URL]
Wen, Huiping. 2002. You ‘(y) avoir’ grammatical dans le mandarin de Taïwan [Grammatical you ‘to have’ in Taiwan Mandarin]. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 31.2:279–292.Google Scholar
Wickham, Hadley. 2020. rvest: Easily Harvest (Scrape) Web Pages (Version 0.3.6) [R package]. Retrieved July 27, 2020, from [URL]
Wu, Jiun-Shiung, and Zhi-Ren Zheng. 2019. Towards a unified semantics for ū in ū + situation in Taiwan Southern Min: A modal-aspectual account. Chinese Lexical Semantics, 19th Workshop, CLSW 2018, LNAI, ed. by Jia-Fei Hong, Qi Su and Jiun-Shiung Wu, 408–422. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Xiao, Richard, and Tony McEnery. 2004. Aspect in Mandarin Chinese: A Corpus-based Study. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, Hongzhi. 2019. The experiential aspect of Mandarin Chinese (-guo): Semantics and pragmatics. Lingua 2291:102714. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Wenquan, and Yuwen Dong. 2003. Yuyan bianyi: Hanyu ‘you + VP’ ju jianxi [Language variation: ‘you + VP’ in Mandarin]. Yuwen Jianshe Tongxun 751:27–32.Google Scholar
Zeitoun, Elizabeth. 2007. A Grammar of Mantauran (Rukai). Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Zeitoun, Elizabeth, and Lillian M. Huang. 1997. Toward a typology of tense, aspect and modality in the Formosan languages: A preliminary study. Chinese Languages and Linguistics IV: Typological Studies of Languages in China, ed. by Chiu-yu Tseng, 595–618. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Collart, Aymeric
2024. It Costs To Exist: Acceptability Judgments of the Temporal Concord of the Auxiliary Verbs You and Hui in Taiwan Mandarin. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 53:3 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.