References (36)
Androutsopoulos, Jannis
2008 “Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography”. Language@Internet vol., 5 (9).Google Scholar
2013 “Online data collection.” In Data collection in sociolinguistics: Methods and applications, ed. by C. Malinson, B. Childs, & V. Herk, 236–250. Routledge.Google Scholar
Atkins, Judi, Finlayson, Alan, Martin, James and Turnbull, Nick
(eds.) 2014Rhetoric in British Politics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barton, David, and Lee, Carmen
2013Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouvier, Gwen
2022 “From ‘echo chambers’ to ‘chaos chambers’: discursive coherence and contradiction in the #MeToo Twitter feed.” Critical Discourse Studies 19 (2): 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouvier, Gwen, and Machin, David
2021 “What gets lost in Twitter ‘cancel culture’ hashtags? Calling out racists reveals some limitations of social justice campaigns.” Discourse & Society 32 (3): 307–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brock, André
2018 “Critical technocultural discourse analysis.” New Media & Society 20 (3): 1012–1030. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dillet, Benoît
2022 “Speaking to algorithms? Rhetorical political analysis as technological analysis.” Politics 42 (2): 231–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992Discourse and social change. Cambridge: PolityGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Wodak, Ruth
1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” in Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. By T. van Dijk, 258–284. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan. C.
2004 “Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior.” In Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning, ed. by S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray, 338–376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Web Content Analysis: Expanding the Paradigm”. In International Handbook of Internet Research, ed. by J. Hunsinger, L. Klastrup, and M. Allen, 233–250. Springer: London and New York.Google Scholar
2014 “Research: Computer-mediated communication”. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 40 (3): 41–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hine, Christine
2015Ethnography for the Internet Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Inwood, Olivia, and Zappavigna, Michele
2021 “Ambient affiliation, misinformation and moral panic: Negotiating social bonds in a YouTube internet hoax.” Discourse & Communication 15 (3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Rodney
2004 “The problem of context in computer-mediated communication.” In Discourse and technology: multimodal discourse analysis, ed. by Levine, T., and Scollon, R., 22–33. Georgetown University Press: Washington.Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney H., Chik, Alice, and Hafner, Christoph. A.
(eds.) 2015Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the Digital Age. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid
2014 “Critical discourse analysis, power, and new media discourse.” In Why discourse matters: Negotiating identity in the mediatized world, ed. by M. Kopytowska & Y. Kalyango, 287–305. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2017 “Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS).” In Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson, 582–596. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Social media techno-discursive design, affective communication and contemporary politics.” Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 11 (4): 427–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 “Populist digital media? Social media systems and the global populist right discourse.” Public Seminar. [URL]
2022 “Digital meaning-making across content and practice in social media critical discourse studies.” Critical Discourse Studies 19 (2): 119–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Esposito, Eleonora
2018 “Online hate, digital discourse and critique: Exploring digitally mediated discursive practices of gender-based hostility.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics: Special Issue on Narrating Hostility, Challenging Hostile Narratives 14 (1): 45–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Unger, Johan. W.
2016 “Critical discourse studies and social media: Power, resistance and critique in changing media ecologies.” In Methods of critical discourse studies. 3rd ed., ed. by R. Wodak, & M. Meyer, 205–233. SAGE. [URL]
Norris, Sigrid, and Jones, Rodney. H.
2005Discourse in action: introducing mediated discourse analysis. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth
2012Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Page, Ruth, Barton, David, Unger, Johan. W., and Zappavigna, Michelle
2014Researching language in social media. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi
2015Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron
2001Mediated Discourse: The nexus of practice. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron, and Scollon, Suzie Wong
2004Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagg, Caroline
2015Exploring Digital Communication Language in Action. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert, and Wodak, Ruth
2003 “Introduction: Theory, Interdisciplinarity and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity, ed. by G. Weiss, & R. Wodak, 1–34. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele
2011 “Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter.” New Media & Society 13 (5): 788–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022 “Social media quotation practices and ambient affiliation: Weaponising ironic quotation for humorous ridicule in political discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 191: 98–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele, and Dreyfus, Shoshana
2022 “ ‘In these pandemic times’: The role of temporal meanings in ambient affiliation about COVID-19 on Twitter.” Discourse, Context & Media 47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar