References (36)
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2008. “Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography”. Language@Internet vol., 5 (9).Google Scholar
. 2013. “Online data collection.” In Data collection in sociolinguistics: Methods and applications, ed. by C. Malinson, B. Childs, & V. Herk, 236–250. Routledge.Google Scholar
Atkins, Judi, Finlayson, Alan, Martin, James and Turnbull, Nick. (eds.). 2014. Rhetoric in British Politics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barton, David, and Lee, Carmen. 2013. Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouvier, Gwen. 2022. “From ‘echo chambers’ to ‘chaos chambers’: discursive coherence and contradiction in the #MeToo Twitter feed.” Critical Discourse Studies 19 (2): 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouvier, Gwen, and Machin, David. 2021. “What gets lost in Twitter ‘cancel culture’ hashtags? Calling out racists reveals some limitations of social justice campaigns.” Discourse & Society 32 (3): 307–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brock, André. 2018. “Critical technocultural discourse analysis.” New Media & Society 20 (3): 1012–1030. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dillet, Benoît. 2022. “Speaking to algorithms? Rhetorical political analysis as technological analysis.” Politics 42 (2): 231–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: PolityGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Wodak, Ruth. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” in Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. By T. van Dijk, 258–284. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan. C. 2004. “Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior.” In Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning, ed. by S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray, 338–376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. “Web Content Analysis: Expanding the Paradigm”. In International Handbook of Internet Research, ed. by J. Hunsinger, L. Klastrup, and M. Allen, 233–250. Springer: London and New York.Google Scholar
2014. “Research: Computer-mediated communication”. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 40 (3): 41–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hine, Christine. 2015. Ethnography for the Internet Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Inwood, Olivia, and Zappavigna, Michele. 2021. “Ambient affiliation, misinformation and moral panic: Negotiating social bonds in a YouTube internet hoax.” Discourse & Communication 15 (3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Rodney. 2004. “The problem of context in computer-mediated communication.” In Discourse and technology: multimodal discourse analysis, ed. by Levine, T., and Scollon, R., 22–33. Georgetown University Press: Washington.Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney H., Chik, Alice, and Hafner, Christoph. A. (eds.) 2015. Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the Digital Age. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid. 2014. “Critical discourse analysis, power, and new media discourse.” In Why discourse matters: Negotiating identity in the mediatized world, ed. by M. Kopytowska & Y. Kalyango, 287–305. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2015. Discourse, Identity and Legitimacy; Self and Other in representations of Iran’s nuclear programme. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS).” In Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson, 582–596. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Social media techno-discursive design, affective communication and contemporary politics.” Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 11 (4): 427–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Populist digital media? Social media systems and the global populist right discourse.” Public Seminar. [URL]
. 2022. “Digital meaning-making across content and practice in social media critical discourse studies.” Critical Discourse Studies 19 (2): 119–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Esposito, Eleonora. 2018. “Online hate, digital discourse and critique: Exploring digitally mediated discursive practices of gender-based hostility.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics: Special Issue on Narrating Hostility, Challenging Hostile Narratives 14 (1): 45–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Unger, Johan. W. 2016. “Critical discourse studies and social media: Power, resistance and critique in changing media ecologies.” In Methods of critical discourse studies. 3rd ed., ed. by R. Wodak, & M. Meyer, 205–233. SAGE. [URL]
Norris, Sigrid, and Jones, Rodney. H. 2005. Discourse in action: introducing mediated discourse analysis. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth. 2012. Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Page, Ruth, Barton, David, Unger, Johan. W., and Zappavigna, Michelle. 2014. Researching language in social media. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2015. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron. 2001. Mediated Discourse: The nexus of practice. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron, and Scollon, Suzie Wong. 2004. Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagg, Caroline. 2015. Exploring Digital Communication Language in Action. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert, and Wodak, Ruth. 2003. “Introduction: Theory, Interdisciplinarity and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity, ed. by G. Weiss, & R. Wodak, 1–34. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2011. “Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter.” New Media & Society 13 (5): 788–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. “Social media quotation practices and ambient affiliation: Weaponising ironic quotation for humorous ridicule in political discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 191: 98–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele, and Dreyfus, Shoshana. 2022. “‘In these pandemic times’: The role of temporal meanings in ambient affiliation about COVID-19 on Twitter.” Discourse, Context & Media 47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar