Cover not available
Part of
Discourse, Politics and Media in Contemporary China
Edited by Qing Cao, Hailong Tian and Paul Chilton
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 54] 2014
► pp. 77–96

Chapter 3. A decade of change in China

A corpus-based discourse analysis of ten government work reports

 | University of Media and Communications
 | Tianjin Foreign Studies University
The Government Work Reports (GWRs) of China are important documents conveying the government’s voice and publicising the tasks they set for the country, and they attract much attention from diverse sectors of the community. Merging corpus methodology and critical discourse analysis, this study* focuses on 10 years of GWRs to observe the dialectical relationship between discourse and social change. It shows that the discourses represented in the GWRs result in new concerns, which in turn affect the recipients of the discourse and their actions and create new discourses. Keywords: Social change; government work report; corpus-based discourse analysis
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 23 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.54.04qia
References (19)
References
Baker, P. (2010). Representations of Islam in British broadsheet and tabloid newspapers 1999-2005. Language and Politics 9(2), 310–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, P., Gabrielatos C., KhosraviNik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, A. and Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse and Society 19(3), 273–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. and McEnery, A. 2005. A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. Language and Politics 4(2), 197–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., and Reppen, R. 1998. Corpus Linguistics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chouliaraki, L., and Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late Modernity . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change: Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis . London: Longman.Google Scholar
. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research . London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
.. (2006). Language and Globalization . London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. (2009) A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In: Wodak, R.; Meyer, M (Ed.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed) . London: Sage. p. 121–138.Google Scholar
Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J. and Roberts, B. (1978). Policing the Crisis: Mugging, The State and Law and Order . London: Macmillan.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, A. and Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus Linguistics (2nd ed.) . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.Google Scholar
McEnery, A. and Xiao, R. (2004). The Lancaster Corpus of Mandarin Chinese: A corpus for monolingual and contrastive language study. [Powerpoint slides] In M. Lino, M. Xavier, F. Ferreire, R. Costa, R. Silva (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC) 2004, pp. 1175–1178. Lisbon, May 24–30, 2004.Google Scholar
Qian, Y. (2010). Discursive Constructions around Terrorism in the People’s Daily (China) and The Sun (UK) before and after 9.11 . Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Scott, M. (1997). PC analysis of keywords - and key-key Words. System , 25(2), 233–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004). WordSmith Tools Help Manual Version 4 . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: A sociocognitive approach. In Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael. 2009. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed) . London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak, Meyer, Michael (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis . London: Sage publications.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (2009) Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In: Wodak, R.; Meyer, M (Ed.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd edition) . London: Sage. p. 1–33.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Lam Sut I, Michelle
2023. Introduction. In A Corpus-assisted Multimodal Analysis to Policy Addresses of Macao SAR Government [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 11], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Li, Tao & Kaibao Hu
2021. Corpus-Based Translation Studies and Political Discourse Analysis. In Reappraising Self and Others [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 6], ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Situ, Hui, Carol Tilt & Pi-Shen Seet
2021. The influence of the Chinese government's political ideology in the field of corporate environmental reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 34:9 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Lams, Lutgard
2018. Examining Strategic Narratives in Chinese Official Discourse under Xi Jinping. Journal of Chinese Political Science 23:3 ► pp. 387 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Jiayi & Dániel Z. Kádár
2018. Silence and Absence in Chinese Smog Discourses. In Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse, ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.