Cover not available
Part of
Developing New Identities in Social Conflicts: Constructivist perspectives
Edited by Esperanza Morales-López and Alan Floyd
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 71] 2017
► pp. 203–226

Chapter 10
Posthumanism and the city

The construction of identity and ideological conflict in discourses regarding the new technological self

In this paper, I discuss the underlying ideological conflict behind the concept of the “Smart City.” Sometimes naively praised and embraced as a great technological achievement, the Smart City is a very controversial concept, particularly if we interpret it within the context of posthumanist thinking, which discusses the ways in which technology may forever alter our daily lives, our bodies, our minds and, in the end, the whole identity of human beings.
Within the theoretical and analytical framework the constructivist rhetoric offers, my main goal in the paper will be a reflection on the discursive setting of both posthumanism and the Smart City, along with the analysis of a corpus of political discourses describing the “smart” concept regarding the city of Barcelona.
Keywords: constructivist rhetoric, posthumanism, technology, Smart City, Barcelona, ideology, identity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background: Constructivist rhetoric
  • 3.Transhumanism and posthumanism: Definitions and ideological conflict
    • 3.1Human identity: Man’s doing against Mother Nature
    • 3.2The abyss between mind and body
    • 3.3Power and technological inequality
  • 4.Posthumanism and the concept of “Smart City”
  • 5.Barcelona, a Smart City?
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 26 July 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.71.10mol
References (73)
References
Albaladejo, Tomás. 2008. “Textualidad y comunicación: persistencia y renovación del sistema retórico (La rhetorica recepta como base de la retórica moderna).” Rhêtorikê: Revista Digital de Retórica 0: 1–19. ([URL]).
Amartin-Serin, Annie. 1996. La Création Defiée. L’homme Fabrique dans la Littérature. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. Cómo Hacer Cosas con Palabras. Barcelona: Paidós 1982.Google Scholar
Ballesteros Llompart, Jesús. 2012. “Más allá de la eugenesia: el posthumanismo como negación del homo patients .” Cuadernos de Bioética, XXIII: 15–23. ([URL]).
Barcelona en Comú. 2015. “Programa electoral municipals 2015.” [URL]. Accessed March 25, 2016.
Billig, Michael. 1991. Ideology and Opinions. Studies in Rhetorical Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bostrom, Nick. 2005. “In Defence of Posthuman Dignity.” Bioethics (19) 3: 202–214. ([URL]).
Bou, Enric. 2013. La Invenciò de l’Espai. Ciutat i Viatge. Valencia: PUV.Google Scholar
Brunel, Pierre (ed.). 1999. L’Homme Artificiel. Paris: DIDIER-CNED.Google Scholar
Capra, Fritjof. 1996. La Trama de la Vida. Una Nueva Perspectiva de los Sistemas Vivos. Barcelona: Anagrama.Google Scholar
Colado, Sergio, Gutiérrez, Abelardo, Vives, Carlos J. and Valencia, Eduardo. 2015. Smart City. Hacia la Gestión Inteligente. Barcelona: Marcombo.Google Scholar
Colau, Ada. 2015. “De lo primero que haré será convocar a la banca.” La Vanguardia. Meritxell M. Pauné. [URL]. Accessed March 25, 2016.
Colom, Agustí. 2015. “La ‘smart city’ baja al suelo.” El Periódico. Barcelona. Carmen Jané. [URL]. Accessed March 25, 2016.
Damasio, António. 2010. Y el Cerebro Creó al Hombre. Barcelona: Destino.Google Scholar
De Cillia, Rudolf, Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth. 1999. “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse & Society 10 (2): 149–173. ([URL]).
Delgado, Manuel. 2015. El Espacio Público como Ideología. Madrid: Catarata.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1992. What Computers Still Can’t Do. A Critique of Artificial Reason. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Erroteta, Peru. 2015. “La estafa inteligente de la Barcelona de Trias.” El Triangle. [URL]. Accessed March 25, 2016.
Fish, Stanley. 1992. Práctica sin Teoría: Retórica y Cambio en la Vida Institucional. Barcelona: Destino.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2002. Our Posthuman Future. Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans Georg. 1960. Verdad y Método I. Salamanca: Sígueme 2003.Google Scholar
Garnier, Jean Pierre. 2006. Contra los Territorios del Poder. Por un Espacio Público de Debates y… de Combates. Barcelona: Virus editorial.Google Scholar
Graham, Elaine L. 2002. Representations of the Post/Human. Monsters, Aliens and Others in Popular Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Goatly, Andrew. 2007. Washing the Brain. Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halberstam, Judith and Livingston, Ira. 1995. “Introduction: Posthuman Bodies.” In Posthuman Bodies, ed. by Judith Halberstam and Ira Livingston, 1–20. Bloomington – Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How we Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herbrechter, Stefan. 2013. Posthumanism. A Critical Analysis. London – New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hughes, James. 2004. Citizen Cyborg. Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kass, Leon R. 2003. “Ageless Bodies, Happy Souls: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Perfection.” The New Atlantis. A Journal of Technology and Society, spring number. ([URL]).
Kurzweil, Ray. 2000. The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal. 1985. Hegemonía y Estrategia Socialista. Hacia una Radicalización de la Democracia. Barcelona: Siglo XXI 1987.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Moral Politics. How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2002.Google Scholar
. 2004. No Pienses en un Elefante: Lenguaje y Debate Político. Madrid: Editorial Complutense 2007.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lausberg, Henri. 1960. Manual de Retórica Literaria. 3 vols. Madrid: Gredos 1975.Google Scholar
Mansilla, José. 2015. “Algo va mal con las smart cities .” Diagonal. [URL]. Accessed March 25, 2016.
Maturana, Humberto and Varela, Francisco. 1998. The Tree of Knowledge. The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
Menzel, Peter and d’Aluisio, Faith. 2000. Robo Sapiens. Evolution of a New Species. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Molpeceres, Sara. 2011. “La imagen del político como líder. Su construcción retórica a través del discurso y su efecto persuasivo.” In Entre Olózaga y Sagasta. Retórica, Prensa y Poder, ed. by José Antonio Caballero López, José Miguel Delgado Idarreta and Cristina Sáenz de Pipaón Ibáñez, 155–164. Logroño: Instituto de Estudios Riojanos.Google Scholar
. 2014. Mito Literario y Mito Persuasivo. Bases para un Análisis Retórico-mítico del Discurso. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.Google Scholar
Montesano Montessori, Nicolina and Morales-López, Esperanza. 2015. “Multimodal Narrative as an Instrument for Social Change: Reinventing Democracy in Spain- the case of 15M.” CADAAD. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 7 (2): 200–221. ([URL]).
Morin, Edgar. 1990. Introducción al Pensamiento Complejo. Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
Pentland, Alex. 2012. “Reinventing Society in the Wake of Big Data. A Conversation with Alex (Sandy) Pentland.” Edge.org. [URL]. Accessed March 25, 2016.
. 2013. “How, Exactly, Is Big Data Going to Change the World? M.I.T. computer scientist Alex Pentland explains.” Scientific American. Seth Fletcher. [URL]. Accessed March 25, 2016.
Perelman, Chaim and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. 1958. Tratado de la Argumentación. La Nueva Retórica. Madrid: Gredos 1989.Google Scholar
Pisarello, Gerardo. 2015. “Barcelona En Comú presenta su plan para hacer una ciudad ‘más justa, más humana y más democrática’.” Eldiario.es. Arturo Puente. [URL]. Accessed March 25, 2016.
Pracontal, Michel de. 2002. L’Homme Artificiel. Golems, Robots, Clones, Cyborgs. Paris: Denoël.Google Scholar
Pujante, David. 2003. Manual de Retórica. Madrid: Castalia.Google Scholar
. 2016. “Constructivist Rhetoric within the Tradition of Rhetorical Studies in Spain.” Res Rhetorica 1/2016: 30–49.Google Scholar
Ramsbothan, Oliver, Woodhouse, Tom and Miall, Hugh. 2011. Contemporary Conflict Resolution. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1969. Le Conflit des Interprétations. Essais d’Herméneutique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Rifkin, Jeremy. 2014. La Sociedad de Coste Marginal Cero. El Internet de las Cosas, el Procomún Colaborativo y el Eclipse del Capitalismo. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1983. La Filosofía y el Espejo de la Naturaleza. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Schäffner, Christina and Wenden, Anita L. 2004. “Introduction.” In Language and Peace, ed. by Christina Schäffner and Anita L. Wenden, XV–XXV. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schöpflin, George. 1997. “The Function of Myth and Taxonomy of Myths.” In Myths and Nationhood, ed. by Geoffrey Hosking and George Schöplflin, 19–35. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: an Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Somers, Margaret. 1994. “The Narrative Constitution of Identity: A Relational and Network Approach.” Theory and Society 23: 605–649. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The Invisible Committee. 2015. “Fuck off, Google!” [URL]. Accessed March 25, 2016.
Tiqqun. 2015. La Hipótesis Cibernética. Madrid: Acuarela & A. Machado.Google Scholar
Trias, Xavier. 2011. “Barcelona tendrá un Smart City Campus para definir las ciudades inteligentes del futuro.” La Vanguardia. [URL]. Accessed March 25, 2016.
. 2015a. “Ciudad inteligente, la tecnología al servicio de las personas.” In ¿Humanos o Posthumanos? Singularidad Tecnológica y Mejoramiento Humano, ed. by Albert Cortina and Miquel-Àngel Serra, 318–319. Barcelona: Fragmenta Editorial.Google Scholar
. 2015b. “Xavier Trias exigeix que el govern d’Ada Colau accepti mantenir el lideratge public en el sector de les Smart Cities”. CiU Barcelona. Grup Municipal de CiU a l’Ajuntament de Barcelona Webpage. [URL]. Accessed March 25, 2016.
van Dijk, Teun A. 2004a. “Discourse, Ideology and Context.” In Caminos de la Semiótica en la Última Década del Siglo XX, ed. by David Pujante, 47–77. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid and Centro Buendía.Google Scholar
2004b. “Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis.” In Language and Peace, ed. by Christina Schäffner and Anita L. Wenden, 17–33. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Grootendorst, Rob. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vidal Tejedor, Narcís. 2015. La Smart City. Barcelona: UOC.Google Scholar
Wagner, Wolfgang and Hayes, Nicky. 2011. El Discurso de lo Cotidiano y el Sentido Común. La Teoría de las Representaciones Sociales. Barcelona: Anthropos.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. 2003. El Texto Histórico como Artefacto Literario. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
Wilson, Eric G. 2006. The Melancholy Android: on the Psychology of Sacred Machines. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2014/2015. “The Discursive Construction of Strangers: Analysing Discourses about Migrants and Migration from a Discourse-historical Perspective.” Migration and Citizenship 3 (1), winter: 6–10.Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. 2012. Organs without Bodies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Molpeceres, Sara
2020. Beyond the limits of death. In Discourses on the Edges of Life [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 26], ► pp. 180 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.