References
Ames, Daniel R., and Malia F. Mason
2012 “Mind perception.” In The SAGE Handbook of Social Cognition, ed. by Susan T. Fiske, and C. N. Macrae, 115–37. Los Angeles, Calif. SAGE.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angermuller, Johannes, Dominique Maingueneau, and Ruth Wodak
(eds) 2014aThe Discourse Studies Reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b “The Discourse Studies Reader: An Introduction.” In The Discourse Studies Reader, ed. by Johannes Angermuller, Dominique Maingueneau, and Ruth Wodak, 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Aristotle
1998Politics: Translated by C. D. C. Reeve. Indianapolis, Ind. Hackett Pub.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L.
1962How to Do Things with Words. The William James lectures. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann
1967The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
2005Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Key topics in sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blumler, Jay G., and Dennis Kavanagh
1999 “The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features.” Political Communication 16 (3): 209–30.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, Armin
1996 “Politolinguistik: Versuch einer Ortsbestimmung.” In Sprachstrategien und Dialogblockaden: Linguistische und politikwissenschaftliche Studien zur politischen Kommunikation, ed. by Josef Klein, and Hans-Joachim Diekmannshenke, 75–100. Sprache, Politik, Öffentlichkeit 7. Berlin: de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul, and Christina Schäffner
2002a “Introduction: Themes and Principles in the Analysis of Political Discourse.” In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, ed. by Paul Chilton, and Christina Schäffner, 1–41. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds) 2002bPolitics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cillia, Rolf de, and Ruth Wodak
2004 “Politischer Diskurs.” In Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society = Soziolinguistik ein internationales Handbuch zur Wissenschaft von Sprache und Gesellschaft. Vol. 2, edited by Ulrich Ammon. 3 vols, 1638–1653. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Esser, Frank, and Bernd Spanier
2005 “News Management as News.” Journal of Political Marketing 4 (4): 27–57.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1989Language and Power. Language in social life series. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
1995Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Language in social life series. London, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
1998 “Political Discourse in the Media: Analytical Framework.” In Approaches to Media Discourse, edited by Allan Bell, and Peter Garrett, 142–146. Oxford, Malden, Mass. Blackwell.Google Scholar
2003Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London, New York: Routledge.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “A Dialectical-Relational Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis in Social Research.” In Wodak and Meyer 2009, 162–186.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Elda Weizman
2006 “Political Discourse as Mediated and Public Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (2): 143–153.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, Alan, and James Martin
2008 “ ‘It Ain’t What You Say…’: British Political Studies and the Analysis of Speech and Rhetoric.” Brit Pol 3 (4): 445–464.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, Alan
2018 ““Dancing with doxa”: A “Rhetorical Political Analysis” of David Cameron’s sense of Britishness.” In Doing Politics. Discursivity, performativity and mediation in political discourse, edited by Michael Kranert and Geraldine Horan, 59–77. Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture (DAPSAC) 80. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John
(ed) 2014Discourse in context. 1st ed. Contemporary applied linguistics 3. London [u.a.]: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel
2002Archaeology of Knowledge. Routledge classics. London, New York: Rout­ledge.Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger
1986Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gee, James P.
2005An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. 2nd ed. New York, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Girnth, Heiko
1996 “Texte im politischen Diskurs: Ein Vorschlag zur diskursorientierten Beschreibung von Textsorten.” Muttersprache (1): 66–80.Google Scholar
2002Sprache und Sprachverwendung in der Politik: Eine Einführung in die linguistische Analyse öffentlich-politischer Kommunikation. Germanistische Arbeitshefte 39. Tübingen: Niemeyer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre.Google Scholar
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1979Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Harris, Roxy, and Ben Rampton
2014 “Ethnicities Without Guarantees: An Empirically Situated Approach.”In Discourse in context, edited by John Flowerdew. 1st ed., 133–57. Contemporary applied linguistics 3. London [u.a.]: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S.
1952 “Discourse Analysis.” Language 28 (1): 1.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Colin
2007Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity.
Hofstetter, Emily, and Elizabeth Stokoe
2018 “Making “politics” relevant: How constituents and a member of parliament raise political topics at constituency surgeries.” In Doing Politics. Discursivity, performativity and mediation in political discourse, edited by Michael Kranert and Geraldine Horan, 127–50. Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture (DAPSAC) 80. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2005Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Continuum discourse series. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
(ed) 2013Discourse studies reader: Essential excerpts. Bloomsbury discourse. London, New Delhi, New York, Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Jäger, Margret, and Siegfried
1999, Die schleichende Restauration rechten Denkens. Berlin: Aufbau.Google Scholar
Keller, Reiner
2011Wissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse: Grundlegung eines Forschungsprogramms. 3. Aufl. Interdisziplinäre Diskursforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verl. für Sozialwissenschaften.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Julie T.
2010 “A Taxonomy of Interdisciplinarity.” In The Oxford handbook of Interdisciplinarity, ed. by Robert Frodeman. Oxford handbooks. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klemperer, Victor
1946LTI: Notizbuch eines Philologen. Leipzig: Reclam.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas
2000The Reality of the Mass Media. Cultural memory in the present. Stanford, Calif. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lusoli, Wainer, Stephen Ward, and Rachel Gibson
2005 “(Re)connecting Politics? Parliament, the Public and the Internet.” Parliamentary Affairs 59 (1): 24–42.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcinkowski, Frank
2014 “Mediatization of Politics: Reflections on the State of The Concept.” Javnost – The Public 21 (2): 5–22.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marks, Michael P.
2016Metaphors in International Relations Theory. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Martin, James
2014Politics and Rhetoric: A Critical Introduction. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mazzoleni, Gianpietro, and Winfried Schulz
1999 “”Mediatization” of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy?Political Communication 16 (3): 247–261.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miskimmon, Alister, Ben O’Loughlin, and Laura Roselle
2013Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal
2013Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Niehr, Thomas
2014Einführung in die Politolinguistik: Gegenstände und Methoden. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2009 “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Wodak and Meyer 2009, 87–121.Google Scholar
Renkema, Jan
2004Introduction to Discourse Studies. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäffner, Christina
2004 “Political Discourse Analysis from the Point of View of Translation Studies.” Journal of Language and Politics 3 (1): 117–150.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schalk, Helge
1999 “Diskurs: Zwischen Allerweltswort und philosophischem Begriff.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 40: 56–104.Google Scholar
Schröter, Melani, and Björn Carius
2009Vom politischen Gebrauch der Sprache: Wort, Text, Diskurs. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Lang. Eine Einführung.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Gerhard
1986Der politische Wortschatz: Zur Kommunikations- und Textsortenspezifik. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
1993 “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society 4 (2): 249–283.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
2005 “Three Models of Interdisciplinarity.” In A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Paul Chilton, 3–18. Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture v. 13. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warnke, Ingo H., and Jürgen Spitzmüller
2008 “Methoden und Methodologie der Diskurslinguistik-: Grundlagen und Verfahren einer Sprachwissenschaft jenseits textueller Grenzen.” In Methoden Der Diskurslinguistik: Sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge Zur Transtextuellen Ebene, ed. by Ingo H. Warnke, and Jürgen Spitzmüller, 3–54. Linguistik, Impulse & Tendenzen, 1612–8702 31. Berlin: de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wengeler, Martin
2011 “Linguistische Diskursanalysen – deskriptiv, kritisch oder kritisch durch Deskription?” In Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur: Konzepte und Impulse für Wissenschaft und Öffentlichkeit, ed. by Jürgen Schiewe, 35–48. Greifswalder Beiträge zur Linguistik 6.Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G.
1995 “Discourse Analysis: A Critical View.” Language and Literature 4 (3): 157–172.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2004 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Qualitative Research Practice, ed. by Clive Seale, 197–213. London: SAGE.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2014 “Political Discourse Analysis – Distinguishing Frontstage and Backstage Contexts: A Discourse-Historical Approach.” In Flowerdew 2014, 321–345.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Rolf de Cillia
2007 “Commemorating the Past: The Discursive Construction of Official Narratives about the ‘Rebirth of the Second Austrian Republic’.” Discourse & Communication 1 (3): 337–363.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
1998Zur diskursiven Konstruktion nationaler Identität. 1. Aufl. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft 1349. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
(eds) 2009Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd edn. Introducing qualitative methods. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
(eds) 2016Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. 3rd edn. London, Thousand Oaks California: SAGE.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2018 ““We have the character of an island nation”: A discourse-historical analysis of David Cameron’s “Bloomberg speech” on the European Union.” In Doing Politics. Discursivity, performativity and mediation in political discourse, edited by Michael Kranert and Geraldine Horan, 27–58. Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture (DAPSAC) 80. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Weizman, Elda & Zohar Livnat
2022. Dialogic meaning-making in political settings. Pragmatics and Society 13:5  pp. 731 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.