Cover not available
Part of
Imagining the Peoples of Europe: Populist discourses across the political spectrum
Edited by Jan Zienkowski and Ruth Breeze
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 83] 2019
► pp. 201–228

Chapter 8
The discursive construction of the people in European political discourse

Semantics and pragmatics of a contested concept in German, French, and British parliamentary debates

Who are the people? As a semantically underspecified noun, the lexeme “people” and related terms such as “citizen(s)” or “constituent(s)” lead to various representations and are filled with competing meanings. By undertaking a cross-linguistic analysis of the semantic value of nouns denoting human referents in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, this paper investigates how the “people” (people in English, Volk in German, peuple in French) and related linguistic expressions (notably Mensch, Bürger, citoyen) are discursively staged in national parliamentary debates on Europe.

The people represent the entity Members of Parliament (MPs) speak to, about, and on behalf of. In political sciences, mentioning the people immediately raises concerns about a populist message or stance. To which extent, then, does the reference to “the people” or “a people” pertain to a populist stance?

Based on an annotated corpus of forty-four national parliamentary debates between 1998 and 2015, this paper uses mixed methods (qualitative and quantitative) to assess how the “people” are referred to across the political spectrum in the British House of Commons, the German Bundestag and the French Assemblée nationale. By taking into account a large amount of speakers across different times and cultures, the analysis shows that the reference to “the people” – partly in opposition to “a people” – is a basic component of political discourse, thus indicating that the mere mention of the “people” cannot be regarded as a feature of populist rhetoric.

Keywords: people, citizen, constituent, populism, political discourse, parliament, comparison, Germany, France, United Kingdom
Article outline
  • Introduction: Referring to the “people”: A cross-linguistic perspective
  • On the assumed relationship between people and populism
    • Populism: The impossible definition?
    • Minimum requirements to be a populist
    • Populists in the parliament: An oxymoron?
  • Semantic properties of the “people”
    • Shared semantic properties in English, German, and French
    • Whom do the lexemes people, Volk, and peuple refer to?
  • Frequency and distribution of people, Volk, and peuple in the three corpora
  • National specificities: German Volk and French peuple
    • Defending the use of the noun Volk in German contemporary political discourse: A strong stance
    • Representing le peuple in the context of the 2005 French referendum
  • Responding to people’s (assumed) expectations
    • Appealing to the people in English: Searching for French and German “equivalents”
    • Formulating questions and claims through the lens of the people
    • Making the people speak: Ventriloquizing as a resource in political discourse
  • Picking the noun denoting human referents: “Citizens” and “people” in contrast
  • Conclusion: The reference to the people, a property of political discourse
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 13 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.83.09tru
References
Baker, Paul, Andrew Hardie and Tony McEnery
2006 A Glossary of Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouillaud, Christophe
2001 “Par le peuple, pour le peuple. Le populisme et les démocraties.” Revue française de science politique 51 (1): 298–301.Google Scholar
Cappeau, Paul, and Catherine Schnedecker
2014 “Gens, personne(s), individu(s): trois saisies de l’humain.” In 4ème Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, vol. 8, ed. by Judith Meinschaefer, Franck Neveu, Peter Blumenthal, Linda Hriba, and Annette Gerstenberg: 3027–3040. Berlin. [URL]Google Scholar
Cooren, François and Sergeiy Sandler
2014 “Polyphony, Ventriloquism, and Constitution: In Dialogue with Bakhtin.” Communication Theory 24 (3): 225–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cock
, Barbara 2006 “El discurso político entre oral y escrito.” In Usos sociales del lenguaje y aspectos psicolingüísticos. Perspectivas aplicadas, ed. by Joana Salazar Noguera, Marian Amengual Pizarro, and María Juan Garau: 123–130. Palma: Universitat de les Illes Balears Servei de Publicaciones i Intercanvi Científic.Google Scholar
Dezé, Alexandre
2004 “Lectures critiques : Le populisme ou l’introuvable Cendrillon. Autour de quelques ouvrages récents.” Revue française de science politique 54 (1): 179–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Jean, and Françoise Dubois Charlier
1996 “Collectifs d’êtres vivants.” Linx 34 (1): 125–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, Susan
2012 “Text trajectories, legal discourse and gendered inequalities.” Applied Linguistics Review 3 (1). 47–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hainsworth, Paul
2006 “France Says No: The 29 May 2005 Referendum on the European Constitution.” Parliamentary Affairs 59 (1): 98–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra
2001 “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 12 (4): 451–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heiden, Serge
2010 “The TXM Platform: Building Open-Source Textual Analysis Software Compatible with the TEI Encoding Scheme.” 389–398. Institute for Digital Enhancement of Cognitive Development, Waseda University. [URL]
Hermet, Guy
2001 Les populismes dans le monde. Une histoire sociologique, XIXe-XXe siècle. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Higgins, Michael
2013 “Governmentality, Populism and Empowerment: David Cameron’s Rhetoric of the Big Society.” In The Media, Political Participation and Empowerment, ed. by Richard Scullion, Roman Gerodimos, Daniel Jackson, and Darren Lilleker: 58–70. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Lutz
1991 “Das ,Volk‘. Zur ideologischen Struktur eines unvermeidbaren Begriffs.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 20 (3): 191–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hubé, Nicolas, and Naomi Truan
2016 “France: The Reluctance to Use the Word “Populism” as a Concept.” In Populist Political Communication in Europe. A Cross-National Analysis of European Countries, ed. by Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Carsten Reinemann, Jesper Stromback, and Claes de Vreese: 181–194. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ihl, Olivier, Janine Chêne, and Eric Vial
2003 La tentation populiste au cœur de l’Europe. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Kämper, Heidrun
2005 Der Schulddiskurs in der frühen Nachkriegszeit. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des sprachlichen Umbruchs nach 1945. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhardt
1992 “Volk, Nation, Nationalismus, Masse.” In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, vol. 7, ed. by Otto Brunner, Werner Conze, and Reinhardt Koselleck: 141–431. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto
1977 Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory: Capitalism – Fascism – Populism. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Lafon, Pierre
1980 “Sur la variabilité de la fréquence des formes dans un corpus.” Mots 1 (1): 127–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lecolle, Michelle
2007 “Enjeux argumentatifs de la nomination : le cas du nom collectif communauté dans les discours publics contemporains.” In Christian Boix (ed.), Argumentation, manipulation, persuasion: 227–247. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher
1999 Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maingueneau, Dominique
2000 Analyser les textes de communication. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Mange, Jessica and Pascal Marchand
2007 “ Oui ou non à la Constitution européenne. L’éloquence du forum.” Mots (83). 121–137. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Moirand, Sophie
2004 “L’impossible clôture des corpus médiatiques. La mise au jour des observables entre catégorisation et contextualisation.” Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique (40). 71–92.Google Scholar
Retterath, Jörn
2016 ,Was ist das Volk?‘. Volks- und Gemeinschaftskonzepte der politischen Mitte in Deutschland 1917–1924. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguieff, Pierre-André
2002 L’illusion populiste. De l’archaïque au médiatique. Paris: Berg International.Google Scholar
Teubert, Wolfgang, and Anna Cermáková
2004 “Directions in corpus linguistics.” In Lexicology and Corpus Linguistics. An Introduction, ed. by Michel A. K. Halliday, Anna Cermáková, Wolfgang Teubert, and Colin Yallop: 113–166. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain, Paul Thibaud, Benjamin Stora, Jean Stengers, Odile Rudelle, Alain Besancon, Alain Bergounioux, Bertrand Badie, and Maurice Agulhon
1997 “Le populisme ?” Vingtième Siècle 56 (1): 224–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Truan, Naomi
2016a Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the Assemblée nationale (2002–2012) [Corpus]. ORTOLANG (Open Resources and TOols for LANGuage). [URL].Google Scholar
2016b Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the Deutscher Bundestag (1998–2015) [Corpus]. ORTOLANG (Open Resources and TOols for LANGuage). [URL].Google Scholar
2016c Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the House of Commons (1998–2015) [Corpus]. ORTOLANG (Open Resources and TOols for LANGuage). [URL].Google Scholar
2017 “Zwischenrufe zwischen parlamentarischer Routine und Kreativität. Bundestagsdebatten über Europa aus dem Blickwinkel von unautorisierten Unterbrechungen.” Cahiers d’Etudes Germaniques (73): 125–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Generisch, unpersönlich, indefinit? Die Pronomina man, on, one und generisches you im politischen Diskurs.” In Hélène Vinckel-Roisin, Laurent Gautier and Pierre-Yves Modicom (eds.), Diskursive Verfestigungen. Schnittstellen zwischen Morphosyntax, Phraseologie und Pragmatik im Deutschen und im Sprachvergleich: 347–363. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Richard
2008 “Well-known and influential corpora.” In Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook, vol. 1, ed. by Anke Lüdeling, and Merja Kytö: 383–457. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Salamurović, Aleksandra
2020. Metonymy and the conceptualisation of nation in political discourse. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 8:1 ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Taylor, Charlotte & Dario del Fante*
2020. Comparing across languages in corpus and discourse analysis: some issues and approaches. Meta 65:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Truan, Naomi
2019. Talking about, for, and to the People: Populism and Representation in Parliamentary Debates on Europe. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 67:3 ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Truan, Naomi
2021. Narratives of dialogue in parliamentary discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 20:4 ► pp. 563 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. The Politics of Person Reference [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 320], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 february 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.