Chapter published in:
Political Discourse in Central, Eastern and Balkan Europe
Edited by Martina Berrocal and Aleksandra Salamurović
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 84] 2019
► pp. 3968
References

References

Boćkowski, Daniel, and Dzienkiewicz, Anna
(2007) “Katyń – zbrodnia (nadal) chroniona tajemnicą państwową [Crime still Protected as a Official Secret].” In Oprawcy z Katynia [Executioners from Katyn], ed. by Władimir Abarinow, 311–327. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.Google Scholar
Cienciala, Anna, Natalia Lebedeva, and Wojciech Materski
(eds) 2007Katyn. A Crime Without Punishment. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Duma debates
. Available at http://​transcript​.duma​.gov​.ru/, retrieved 19 June 2016.
Etkind, Alexander, Rory Finnin et al.
2012Remembering Katyn. Cambridge UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Gur’janov, Aleksandr
2015 « Dlja nas vopros o poimennoj reabilitacii ubityx v Katyni ključevoj. » Interview 10th November 2015 [The Key Question for Us is the Question of the Rehabilitation of Each and Every Person Killed in Katyn. Available at http://​award​.gaidarfund​.ru​/articles​/2443, retrieved 19 June 2016.
Komersant
2016Ольга Шкуренко, Как признавали Катынь Журнал “Коммерсантъ Власть” №15 от 19.04.2010, стр. 44. Available at: http://​www​.kommersant​.ru​/doc​/1354497, retrieved 19 June 2016.
Pol’skie politiki
2010RIA novosti 2010. Available at http://​ria​.ru​/politics​/20101126​/301258560​.html​?rubric​=archive, retrieved 19 June 2016.
Puškov
2015 Available at https://​russian​.rt​.com​/article​/84879, retrieved 19 June 2016.
Rathmayr, Renate
1996Pragmatik der Entschuldigungen [Pragmatics of Apologies]. Köln-Weimar: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Rome Statue
Sejm
2013Książka 2013: 280–292.Google Scholar
Słownik online
Tages-Anzeiger
2001Tages-Anzeiger 11.04.2001Google Scholar
Uchwała Sejmu
2005 Available at http://​wyborcza​.pl​/1,76842,2615675​.html? Disable Redirects= true, retrieved 19 June 2016.
Weiss, Daniel
2012 “Deputaty ljubjat citaty.” In Rusistika segodnja, vypusk 5: Problemy rečevogo obščenija, ed. by Nina N. Rozanova, 64–75, Moskva: Flinta-Nauka.Google Scholar
2013a “Parliamentary Communication: the Case of the Russian Gosduma.” In Approaches to Slavic Interaction, ed. by Nadine Thielemann, and Peter Kosta, 215–237. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b “Parlamentsdebatten in der russischen Gosduma: Originalton vs. Transkript [Parliamentary Debates in the Russian Duma: Original Recording vs. Electronic Transcripts].” Wiener Slawistischer Almanach 72: 103–136.Google Scholar
2015 “Chula v Gosdume [Criticism in the Russian Duma].” In Chvala i chula v jazyke i kommunikacii. Sbornik statej [Praise and Criticism in Language and Communication. Collection of Articles], ed. by Ljudmila L. Fedorova, 163–186. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo RGGU.Google Scholar
2016 “Quotations in the Russian State Duma: Types and Functions.” In: Contemporary Eastern European Political Discourse, Special issue, ed. by Daniel Weiss. Zeitschrift für Slavistik 1: 184–214.Google Scholar
2017 “Implizite Argumentation im politischen Diskurs: Metaphern, Vergleiche, intertextuelle Verweise [Implicit Argumentation in Political Discourse]”. In Im Rhythmus der Linguistik. Festschrift für S. Kempgen [In the Rhythm of Linguistics], ed. by Anna-Maria Mayer and Ljilijana Reinkowski, 465–483. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.Google Scholar
Zajavlenie
2010 Available at http://​www​.kommersant​.ru​/doc​/1547722, retrieved 19 June 2016.