Chapter 8
Discursive construction of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’
Analysis of commemorative speeches (2004–2016) on the Croatian Homeland War
Commemorative speeches as an annual ritual play an important role in the memory discourse of a society. They construct political and social realities, as well as a collective identity. The following paper discusses the content and the form of official remembrance of the Homeland War in Croatia, which took place from 1991 to 1995. In particular, I will focus on the constitution of the elements of national identity and collective memory of the 1990s within the selected speeches of Croatian political leaders between 2004 and 2016. Hereby, the emphasis is on the discursive presentation of Self and Others. The analysis draws on theoretical and methodological frameworks of the Discourse-Historical Approach within the Critical Discourse Analysis.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.War and memory in Croatia
- 3.Theoretical and methodological foundations
- 3.1Commemorative speeches as a part of political discourse
- 3.2Discursive construction of identity and difference
- 4.Discursive construction of ‘Us’
- 4.1The Croatian Nation: Democratic, independent, modern and European
- 4.2The Croatian Defenders: Timeless, legitimate and unqestionable heroes
- 4.2.1The Homeland War: A legitimate and legal defensive war
- 4.2.2The personification of political events: The visionary Franjo Tuđman
- 4.3Preliminary conclusions
- 5.The discursive construction of ‘Them’
- 5.1Europe and the European Union: Inspiring example and antagonist at once
- 5.2The Serbian Rebels and the Yugoslavian National Army: Anonymous enemies
- 5.3Preliminary conclusions
- 6.Conclusions and discussion
-
Notes
-
References
-
Appendix
References
Abazović, Dino
2014 “
Reconciliation, Ethnopolitics and Religion in Bosnia-Herzegovina”. In
Post-Yugoslavia. New Cultural and Political Perspectives ed. by
Abazović, Dino,
Velikonja, Mitja, 35–56. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Andrić, Gergiana, Milekić, Sven
2014 “
Serbia Mourns Victims of Croatia’s Operation Storm.”
Balkan Insight. Available at
[URL], retrieved: September 2017.
Bakić, Jovo
2009 Extreme-Right Ideology, Practice and Supporters: Case Study of the Serbian Radical Party. In
Journal of Contemporary European Studies 17 (2): 193–207.
Banjeglav, Tamara
2012 “
Memory of War or War over Memory? The Official Politics of Remembering in 1990s Croatia.” In
Re-Thinking European Politics and History, ed. by
Agnieszka Pasieka et al. IWM Junior Visiting Fellows’ Conferences. Wien. Available at
[URL], retrieved September 2017.
Barić, Nikica
2008 “
The Rise and Fall of the Republic of Serb Krajina (1990–1995)”. In
Croatia since Independence. War, Politics, Society, Foreign Relations, ed. by
Ramet, Sabrina P.,
Clewing, Konrad,
Lukić, Reneo. In
Südosteuropäische Arbeiten 131, ed. by
Edgar Hösch and
Konrad Clewing, 89–105. München: R. Oldenbourg.
Berek, Mathias
2009 Kollektives Gedächtnis und die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Eine Theorie der Erinnerungskulturen [
Collective Memory and Social Construction of Reality. A Theory of Commemorative Culture]. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz.
Bohnet, Henri, Anja Czymmeck, and Michael A. Lange et al.
2013 “
Das Haager Kriegsverbrechertribunal in den Ländern des ehemaligen Jugoslawiens [The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia].”
Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. Auslandsinformationen. Available at
[URL], retrieved September 2017.
Dafeld, Maike
2015 Editorial. In
Balkan. Perspectives. A Magazine of Dealing with the Past. Issue 01, 01/02/2015. Available at
[URL], retrieved: September 2017.
Gross, Mirjana
1993 “
Wie denkt man kroatische Geschichte? Geschichtsschreibung als Identitätsstiftung [How does the Croatian History Think?].”
Österreichische Osthefte. Zeitschrift für Mittel-Ost-und Südosteuropaforschung 1 (35): 73–99.
Höpken, Wolfgang
2007 “
Post-sozialistische Erinnerungskulturen im ehemaligen Jugoslawien.” In
Südosteuropa: Traditionen als Macht, ed. by
Emil Brix,
Arnold Suppan and
Vyslonzil, Elisabeth, 13–51. Wien: Oldenbourg.
Höpken, Wolfgang
1999 “
‘Vergangenheitsbewältigung’ in Südosteuropa – Chance oder Last? [Overcoming the Past in Southern Europe- Chance or Burden].”
Südosteuropa. Journal of Politics and Society 48: 613–628, München: De Gruyter.
Ismaili, Mefail, and Maja Vaseva
2015 “
The Fog of the Past is not Lifting from Macedonia”. In
Balkan.Perspectives. A Magazine of Dealing with the Past. Issue 01, 01/02/2015. Available at
[URL], retrieved: September 2017.
Jović, Dejan
2004 “
‘Official Memories’ in Post-authoritarianism: An Analytical Framework”.
Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 6 (2): 97–108.
Jović, Dejan
2012 “
The War That Is Not Allowed to Be Forgotten: Nationalist Discourse on the ‘Homeland War’ (1991–1995) in Contemporary Croatia.”
Südosteuropa-Mitteilungen 3: 52–69.
Kienpointer, Manfred
1992 Alltagslogik: Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.
Klein, Josef
2000 “
Textsorten im Bereich politischer Institutionen [Text Types in Political Institutions].” In
Text- und Gesprächslinguistik. Linguistics of Text and Conversation. Linguistics of Text and Conversation Vol. 1, ed. By
Klaus Brinker,
Gerd Antos, and
Wolfgang Heinemann et al., 732–755. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.
Koren, Snježana
2015 “
Twentieth-century wars in history teaching and public memory of present-day Croatia.”
Studi sulla formazione 2: 11–32.
Kuljić, Todor
2010 Umkämpfte Vergangenheiten. Die Kultur der Erinnerung im postjugoslawischen Raum [
Contested Pasts. Commemorative Culture in Post-Yugoslawia]. Berlin: Verbrecher Verlag.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnsen
1980 Metaphors We Live by. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Leutloff-Grandits, Carolin
2006 Die schwierige Rückkehr serbischer Kriegsflüchtlinge nach Kroatien (1995–2005) [The Difficult Return of Serbian War Refugee to Croatia]. In
Definitionsmacht, Utopie, Vergeltung. ‘Ethnische Säuberungen’ im östlichen Europa des 20. Jahrhunderts [
The Power of Definition, Utopia, Retaliation. ‘Ethnic Cleansing’ in Eastern Europe of the 20th Centrury], ed. by
Ulf Brunnbauer,
Michael G. Esch and
Holm Sundhaussen. Berlin: LIT Verlag.
Musolff, Andreas
2010 Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust. The Concept of the Body Politics. New York/Oxon: Routledge.
Musolff, Andreas
2012 “
The Study of Metaphor as Part of Critical Discourse Analysis.”
Critical Discourse Studies 9 (30): 301–310.
Obradović-Wochnik, Jelena
2009 “
Knowledge, Acknowledgement and Denial in Serbia’s Responses to the Srebrenica Massacre”.
Journal of Contemporary European Studies 17 (1): 61–74.
Pantovic, Milivoje
2016 “
Serbia Mourns Victims of Croatia’s Operation Storm.” Available at
[URL], retrieved September 2017.
Pavlaković, Vjeran
2005 “
Serbia Transformed? Political Dynamics in the Milošević Era and After.” In
Serbia Since 1989: Politics and Society under Milošević and After, ed. by
Sabrina Ramet and
Vjeran Pavlaković, 13–55. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Petrović, Ksenija
2012 Nationale Identität und Religion in Serbien und Kroatien im Vergleich. [
National Identity and Religion in Serbia and Croatia. A Comparative Study]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Ramet, Sabrina
2007 “
The Denial Syndrome and its Consequences: Serbian Political Culture Since 2000”.
Communist and Post-Communist Studies 40: 41–58.
Reisigl, Martin
2008 “
Rhetoric of political speeches”. In
Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, ed. by
Ruth Wodak and
Veronika. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Reisigl, Martin
2007 Nationale Rhetorik in Fest- und Gedenkreden. Eine diskursanalytische Studie zum “österreichischen Millennium” in den Jahren 1946 und 1996 [
National Rhetorics in Jubilee and Commemorative Speeches. A Discourse-Analytical Study about the “Austrian Millenium” in 1946 and 1996]. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Salamurović, Aleksandra
2012 “
Die Sprache im gegenwärtigen politischen und medialen Diskurs in Serbien und Kroatien zwischen Euroskeptizismus und Populismus [Language use in contemporary discourse of politics and media in Serbia and Croatia between Euroscepticism and Populism]”
Südosteuropa. Zeitschrift für Politik und Gesellschaft, Sonderheft “Euroskeptizismus und Populismus in Südosteuropa”, ed. by
Florian, Bieber;
Daniela, Mehler;
Ksenija, Petrović 2: 239–263, Regensburg: Institut für ost- und Südosteuropaforschung.
Subotic, Jelena
2015 “
The Mythologizing of Communist Violence”. In
Post-Communist Transitional Justice. Lessons from Twenty-Five Years of Experience, ed. by
Lavinia Stan and
Nadya Nedelsky, 188–209. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sundhaussen, Holm
1993 Experiment Jugoslawien. Von der Staatsgründung bis zum Staatszerfall [
Experient Yugoslawia. From the From The Founding of the State to its]. Mannheim/Leipzig/Wien/Zürich: BI-Taschenbuchverlag.
Volmert, Jan, and Eva Neuland
2003 “
Sprache und Politik. Linguistische und didaktische Perspektiven [Language and Politics. Linguistic and Educational Perspectives].”
Der Deutschunterricht: Beiträge Zu Seiner Praxis und Wissenschaftlichen Grundlegung 2: 2–8.
Wengeler, Martin
2005 “
Gastarbeiter sind auch Menschen. Argumentationsanalyse als diskursgeschichtliche Methode [Immigrant Workers are People too. Argumentation Analysis as a Discourse-Historical Method].” In
Sprachgeschichte als Zeitgeschichte, ed. by
Martina Wengeler, 224–246. Hildesheim/Zürich/New York: De Gruyter.
Wodak, Ruth
1998 Zur diskursiven Konstruktion nationaler Identität [
Discursive Contruction of National Identity]. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
2009 Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Wölfl, Adelheid
2013 „
Kroatien nach den ICTY-Freisprüchen im November 2012 – Ein Stimmungsbild“ (Croatia after Acquittals at the ICTY in November 2012 – Current impressions).
Südosteuropa-Mitteilungen. 02/2013: 65–72. München: Südosteuropa-Gesellschaft.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Kobielska, Maria
2021.
Ceremonial events at non-sites of memory: Seven framings of a difficult past.
International Journal of Heritage, Memory and Conflict 1
► pp. 55 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.