Cover not available
Part of
Political Discourse in Central, Eastern and Balkan Europe
Edited by Martina Berrocal and Aleksandra Salamurović
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 84] 2019
► pp. 239–264

Chapter 10
Under One Sun?

Semiotic transformation of the cognitive model nation in the Republic of Macedonia on the occasion of the 20th Anniversary of Independence in 2011

The present chapter examines the semiotic transformation of the cognitive model nation as communicated and discursively constructed in commemorative and jubilee speeches concerning the wider context of the 20th Anniversary of Independence in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM). Theoretically, it draws on the socio-cognitive approach to collective identity and cognitive pragmatics. The methodological framework is based both on quantitative (using corpus linguistics tools) and qualitative analysis. We focused especially on the use of the metonymy “Macedonia”, which is the most frequent term in analysed speeches. Polysemous referentiality and accompanied semiotic events induce, from the point of view of cognitive pragmatics, great contextual effects of this metonymy. Furthermore, ethnonyms, syntactic structures and argumentation patterns are analysed in order to test the hypothesis of discursively erased distinction between different ethnic groups. Finally, the analysis considers possible differentiations caused by participants involved in practices around text, i.e. political figures delivering jubilee speeches.

Keywords: Macedonia, metonymy, collective identity, staatsnation , kulturnation , socio-cognitive approach, cognitive pragmatics, jubilee speeches
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
  • 3.Corpus
  • 4.Methodological framework
  • 5.United nation under one sun?
    • 5.1Quantitative findings
    • 5.2 macedonia as a cognitive concept and a pragmatic tool
    • 5.3Other social actors in speeches
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.84.10sal
References
Anderson, Benedict
1983 Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul
2006 Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London, New Delhi, New York, Sidney: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, and Tony McEnery
2013 “Sketching Muslims: A Corpus Driven Analysis of Representations Around the World ‘Muslim’ in the British Press 1998–2009.” Applied Linguistics 34 (3): 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brdar, Mario
2009 “Metonymy-induced polysemy and the role of suffixation in its resolution in some Slavic languages.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7(1): 58–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brunnbauer, Ulf
2002 “The Implementation of the Ohrid Agreement: Ethnic Macedonian Resentments.” JEMIE: Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, Available at: [URL], <Retrieved: March 2017>.
Brunnbauer, Ulf, and Christian Voss
(eds) 2008 Inklusion und Exklusion auf dem Westbalkan [Inclusion and Exclusion in the Western Balkans]: 45. Internationale Hochschulwoche der Südosteuropa-Gesellschaft in Tutzing, 9–13. 10. 2006 München: Sagner.Google Scholar
Ensink, Titus, and Christoph Sauer
2003 “A Discourse Analytic Approach to the Commemorative Speeches about the Warsaw Uprising.” In The Art of Commemoration. Fifty Years after the Warsaw Uprising, ed. by Titus Ensink, and Christoph Sauer, 19–40. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grassmann, Susanne
2013 “Word Learning by Exclusion – Pragmatics, Logic and Processing.” In Beyond Words, Content, Context, and Inference, ed. by Frank Liedtke, and Cornelia Schulze, 67–90. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher, and Piotr Cap
(eds.) 2014 Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher
2014 “Construal Operations in Online Press Reports of Political Protests.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Christopher Hart, and Piotr Cap, 167–188. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Ilievski, S. (: Илиевски, С.
2006 “Скопје – двојазичен или тројазичен град. [Skopje – Bilingual or Trilingual City]” In Јазичната политика и статусот на македонскиот јазик: зборник на трудови од научен собир, одржан на 30–31 март 2005 [Language Policy and Status of the Macedonian Language: Edited Volume with Presentations from the Conference held on March 30–31 2015], ed. by Велковска, С. 96–100. Скопје: Институт за македонски јазик „Крсте Мисирков”.Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika
2012 “How to Analyse Collective Identity in Discourse: Textual and Contextual Parameters.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 5 (2): 19–38. Available at: [URL], retrieved March 2017.
2014a „Applying Social Cognition Research to Critical Discourse Studies.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap, 147–166. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2014b “Cognitive Linguistics and Ideology.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Jeannette Littlemore and John R. Taylor, 234–252. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Liedtke, Frank, and Cornelia Schulze
(eds) 2013 Beyond Words, Content, Context, and Inference. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, Jeanette
2015 Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication. Cambridge: University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markert, Katja, and Malvina Nissim
2006 “Metonymic Proper Names: A Corpus-based Account.” In Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by Anatol Stefanowitsch, and Stefan Th. Gries, 152–174. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Maiilat, Didier, and Steve Oswald
2011 “Constraining Context: a Pragmatic Account of Cognitive Manipulation.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. by Christopher Hart, 65–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oswald, Steve
2014 “It is easy to Miss Something You are Not Looking for: A Pragmatic Account of Covert Communicative Influence for (Critical) Discourse Analysis.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Christopher Hart, and Piotr Cap, 97–120. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Pouscoulous, Nausica
2013 “Early Pragmatics with Words.” In Beyond Words, Content, Context, and Inference, ed. by Frank Liedtke, and Cornelia, Schulze, 121–146. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, Günter, and Zoltán Kövecses
1999 “Towards a Theory of Metonymy.” In Metonymy in Language and Thought, ed. by Klaus-Uwe Panther, and Günther Radden, 17–60, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin
2007 Nationale Rhetorik in Fest- und Gedenkreden [National Rhetoric in Jubilee and Commemorative Speeches]. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag Brigitte Narr GmbH.Google Scholar
2008 Rhetoric of Political Speeches. In Handbooks of Applied Linguistics Vol. 4, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Veronika Keller, 243–269. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2014 “Argumentation Analysis and the Discourse-Historical Approach: A Methological Framework.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Christopher Hart, and Piotr Cap, 67–96, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Ristovski, B.: Ристовски, Б.
2006 “Статусот на македонскиот јазик денеска [Contemporary Status of the Macedonian language]” In Јазичната политика и статусот на македонскиот јазик: зборник на трудови од научен собир, одржан на 30–31 март 2005, ed. By Велковска, С. 7–24. Скопје: Институт за македонски јазик „Крсте Мисирков”.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J., and Lorena Perez Hernandez
2003 “Cognitive Operations and Pragmatic Implication.” In Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing, ed. by Klaus-Uwe Panther, and Linda L. Thornburg, 23–49. Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J.
2014 “On the Nature and Scope of Metonymy in Linguistic Description and Explanation.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Jeannette Littlemore, and John R. Taylor, 143–166. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Salamurović, Aleksandra
2012 „Die Sprache im gegenwärtigen politischen und medialen Diskurs in Serbien und Kroatien zwischen Euroskeptizismus und Populismus [Language use in Contemporary discourse of politics and media in Serbia and Croatia between Euroscepticism and Populism]” Südosteuropa. Zeitschrift für Politik und Gesellschaft, Sonderheft “Euroskeptizismus und Populismus in Südosteuropa”, ed. by Florian, Bieber, Daniela, Mehler and Ksenija, Petrović 2: 239–263, Regensburg: Institut für Ost- und Südosteuropaforschung.Google Scholar
Schäffner, Christina
2003 “Framing the past. An analysis of John Major’s address.” In The Art of Commemoration. Fifty Years after the Warsaw Uprising, ed. by Titus Ensink, and Christoph Sauer, 116–140. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soldić, Marko
2012 “Ilinden. Linking a Macedonian Past, Present and Future.” In Transforming National Holidays. Identity Discourse in the West and South Slavic countries, 1985–2010, ed. by Ljiljana Šarić, Karen Gammelsgaard, and Kjetil Ra Hange, 191–212. Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson
1995 Relevance. Communication and Cognition. 2nd edition. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Rudolf de Cillia
2007 “Commemorating the Past: the Discursive Construction of Official Narratives about the ‘Rebirth of the Second Austrian Republic’.” Discourse & Communication 1(3): 337–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Salamurović, Aleksandra
2023. The Metonymy EUrope as a Means of Legitimizing Nations in the Western Balkans. In Konzepte der NATION im europäischen Kontext im 21. Jahrhundert [Linguistik in Empirie und Theorie/Empirical and Theoretical Linguistics, ], ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.