Chapter 7
Communicating risks of an Anti-COVID-19 vaccine in Poland
A comparative case study of content, style and advocacy of three media outlets
This study explores how three influential Polish media outlets covered the controversy around AstraZeneca vaccine in mid-March 2021, when some EU countries (though not Poland) decided to suspend this vaccine after reports of incidents of adverse side-effects related to pulmonary embolism and thrombosis. We find that the coverage was focused on risk reporting and a relatively high level of sensationalism, which is confirmed through a content analysis and a news values discourse analysis. Given the outlets’ different editorial lines, we also trace the advocacy behind each coverage of vaccinations, and the degree to which it was politicized (as opposed to science-topicalized). We present these findings in the context of media panic theory, which is in line with research on media generated “health scares” and other crises. We interpret the results of news values analysis, pointing to high Negativity and Impact, as compatible with the risks-oriented science communication typical of the profit-seeking media companies. We conclude that journalistic practices that thrive on exaggerating risk and uncertainty may well lead to public health crises, especially when such frames get later amplified by social media.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Risk and science communication in mainstream media
- Theoretical frame and empirical research on media panics
- Design of the study
- Results
- Gazeta wyborcza
- TVP info
- Onet.pl
- Discussion and conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
-
Appendix
References (38)
References
Agora. 2021. “Wyniki finansowe Grupy Agora w 1. kwartale 2021 r. [Financial results of Agora Group in the first quartile of 2021].” Agora, May 21, 2021. Retrieved on July 19, 2021 from: [URL]
Badenschier, Franziska, and Holger Wormer. 2012. “Issue Selection in Science Journalism: Towards a Special Theory of News Values for Science News?” Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook: The Sciences’ Media Connection – Public Communication and its Repercussions 28: 59–85.
Bauer, Martin W. 2000. “Classical Content Analysis: A Review.” In Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound: A Practical Handbook, ed. by Martin W. Bauer, and George Gaskell, 131–151. London: Sage.
Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Translated by Mark Ritter. London: Sage Publications.
Bednarek, Monika, and Helen Caple. 2012. News Discourse. London: Continuum.
Bednarek, Monika, and Helen Caple. 2017. The Discourse of News Values. How News Organizations Create Newsworthiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bennett, W. Lance, and Barbara Pfetsch. 2018. “Rethinking Political Communication in a Time of Disrupted Public Spheres.” Journal of Communication 68: 243–253.
Blumler, Jay G., and Michael Gurevitch. 1995. The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2006. “Britain as a Container: Immigration Metaphors in the 2005 Election Campaign.” Discourse & Society 17 (5): 563–581.
Cohen, Stanley. 2002. Folk Devils and Moral Panics. London, New York: Routledge.
Conboy, Martin. 2006. Tabloid Britain: Constructing a Community Through Language. London: Routledge.
Critcher, Chas. 2002. “Media, Government and Moral Panic: The Politics of Paedophilia in Britain 2000–1.” Journalism Studies 3 (4): 521–535.
Davis, Aeron. 2019. Political Communication: A New Introduction for Crisis Times. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Depoux, Anneliese, Sam Martin, Emilie Karafillakis, Raman Preet, Annelies Wilder-Smith, and Heidi Larson. 2020. “The Pandemic of Social Media Panic Travels Faster than the COVID-19 Outbreak.” Journal of Travel Medicine 27 (3).
Dew, Kevin, John Gardner, Elaine H. Morrato, Pauline Norris, Kerry Chamberlain, Darrin Hodgetts, and Jonathan Gabe. 2018. “Public Engagement and the Role of the Media in Post-marketing Drug Safety: The Case of Eltroxin® (levothyroxine) in New Zealand.” Critical Public Health 28 (4): 380–401.
European Medicines Agency. 2021, March 18. “COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca: benefits still outweigh the risks despite possible link to rare blood clots with low blood platelets.” EMA, 18 March, 2021. Retrieved on June 19, 2021 from: [URL]
Garfin, Dana R., Roxane C. Silver, and E. Alison Holman. 2020. “The Novel Coronavirus (COVID-2019) Outbreak: Amplification of Public Health Consequences by Media Exposure.” Health Psychology 39 (5): 355–357.
Gorczyca, Anna. 2021. “‘AstraZeneca? To nie chcę’. Pacjenci boją się szczepionki AstraZeneca i rezygnują ze szczepienia [‘AstraZeneca? Then I don’t want it’ Patients are afraid of AstraZeneca and resign from getting a shot].” Wyborcza. pl. 15 March, 2021. Retrieved on July 20, 2021 from: [URL]
Hilton, Shona, and Emily Smith. 2010. “Public Views of the UK Media and Government Reaction to the 2009 Swine Flu Pandemic.” BMC Public Health 10, 697: 1–10.
Jemielniak, Dariusz, and Yaroslav Krempovych. 2021. “#AstraZeneca Vaccine Disinformation on Twitter.” MedRxiv preprint. ; version posted April 16, 2021.
Jensen, Eric. 2012. “Scientific Sensationalism in American and British Press Coverage of Therapeutic Cloning.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 89 (1): 40–54.
Kilgo, Danielle K., Joseph Yoo, and Thomas J. Johnson. 2019. “Spreading Ebola Panic: Newspaper and Social Media Coverage of the 2014 Ebola Health Crisis.” Health Communication 34 (8): 811–817.
Kitzinger, Jenny. 2009. The Media and Public Risk. [Project Report]. URN 09/14, Cardiff University.
KRRiT [Krajowa Rada Radiofonii i Telewizji]. 2021. “Sprawozdanie Krajowej Rady Radiofonii i Telewizji z działalności w 2020 roku [Annual report of the State Committee for Radio and Television for 2020].” Retrieved on July 20, 2021 from: [URL]
Lupton, Deborah. 2013. Risk. London: Routledge.
McNair, Brian. 2018. Fake News: Falsehood, Fabrication and Fiction in Journalism. London: Routledge.
Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna. 2013. “Towards a Pragma-linguistic Framework for the Study of Sensationalism in News Headlines.” Discourse & Communication 7 (2): 173–197.
Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna. 2017. “Communicating Environmental Science beyond Academia: Stylistic Patterns of Newsworthiness in Popular Science Journalism.” Discourse & Communication 11 (1): 69–88.
Napoli, Philip M. 2019. Social Media and the Public Interest: Media Regulation in the Disinformation Age. New York: Columbia University Press.
Onet.pl. 2021. “Wątpliwa skuteczność szczepionki AstraZeneca? Coraz więcej krajów rezygnuje ze stosowania preparatu. [Dubious effectiveness of AstraZeneca vaccine? Even more countries give up the substance]” Onet.pl., 11 March, 2021. Retrieved on July 20, 2021 from: [URL]
Pieri, Elisa. 2018. “Media Framing and the Threat of Global Pandemics: The Ebola Crisis in UK Media and Policy Response.” Sociological Research Online 24 (1): 73–92.
Porter Abbott, H. 2014. The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, John E. 2007. Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Bloomsbury.
Thompson, John B. 2020. “Mediated Interaction in the Digital Age.” Theory, Culture & Society 37 (1): 3–28.
Völker, Carolin, Johanna Kramm, and Martin Wagner. 2020. “On the Creation of Risk: Framing of Microplastics Risks in Science and Media.” Global Challenges 4, 1900010: 1–12.
Walsh, James. 2020. “Social Media and Moral Panics: Assessing the Effects of Technological Change on Societal Reaction.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 23 (6): 840–859.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna
2024.
Story-ing AI – mini-narrative patterns of contemporary online science journalism.
Discourse & Communication
Zabielska, Magdalena
2024.
„Leczenie COVID-19 u pacjenta” a „Nie lekceważmy zagrożenia 'koronką'".
Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium 8:2
► pp. 31 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.