Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 10:1 (1993) ► pp.131134
References
Ambrosini, Ricardo
1986Review of Hock (1986). Linguistica e letteratura 111.213–219.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo
1972An Introduction to Comparative and Historical Linguis-tics. New York: Macmillan. (2nd ed., Comparative and Historical Linguis-tics, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1989.)Google Scholar
Bammesberger, Alfred
1986Review of Hock (1986). Zeitschrift für verglei-chende Sprachforschung 991.318.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry
1987An Introduction to Historical Linguistics. (= Linguis-tics series , 11.) Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea: Univ. of Papua New Guinea Press; Suva, Fiji: Institute of Pacific Studies, Univ. of the South Pacific. (2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press 1993.)Google Scholar
Embleton, Sheila
1986Review of Hock (1986). Diachronica 31.203–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich
1986Principles of Historical Linguistics. Berlin-New York-Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian D.
1989Review of Hock (1986). Language 651.162–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Alan S. & Angela Delia Volpe
1988Review of Hock (1986). Studies in Language 121.457–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1962Historical Linguistics: An Introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (2nd ed., ibid. 1973; 3rd ed., London & New York: Routledge 1993.)Google Scholar
van der Wurff, Wim
1989 “One Thousand and One Principles of Historical Linguistics”. English Studies 701.441–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

MAKINO, Kenji
2016. A Study on the Therapeutic Effect of <i>Jumihaidokuto</i> in Patients with Acne Vulgaris with Inflammatory Lesions. Nishi Nihon Hifuka 78:3  pp. 270 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.