Review published In:
Vol. 13:2 (1996) ► pp.371384
References (17)
Baxter, William H.
1995 “ ‘A Stronger Affinity … than could have been produced by accident’: A probabilistic comparison of Old Chinese and Tibeto-Burman”. The Ancestry of the Chinese Language ed. by William S.-Y. Wang (= Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monographs , 81), 1–39. Berkeley, Calif.: Project on Linguistic Analysis.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle & Marianne Mithun
eds. 1979The Languages of Native America: Historical and comparative assessment. Austin & London: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R[obert] M. W.
1980The Languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Fowkes, Robert A.
1971 “Glottochronology and Brythonic?”. Studia Celtica 61.189–194.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1987Language in the Americas. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth
1964 “Classification of Northern Paman languages, Cape York Peninsula, Australia: A preliminary report”. Oceanic Linguistics 31. 248–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamp, Eric P.
1979 “A Glance from Here on”. Campbell & Mithun 1979.1001–1015.Google Scholar
Haudricourt, André-Georges
1953 “La place du vietnamien dans les langues austroasiatiques”. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 49:1.122–128.Google Scholar
1954 “De l’origine des tons en vietnamien”. Journal Asiatique 2421.69–82.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, William H., Jr.
1979 “Hokan Inter-Branch Comparisons”. Campbell & Mithun 1979.545–591.Google Scholar
Langdon, Margaret
1979 “Some Thoughts on Hokan with Particular Reference to Pomoan and Yuman”. Campbell & Mithun 1979.592–649.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1908Introduction à l’étude comparative des langues indoeuropéennes. 2e éd. corrigée et augmentée Paris: Librairie Hachette &Cie.Google Scholar
Newman, Roxana Ma
1990An English-Hausa Dictionary. New Haven, Conn. & London: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Pokorny, Julius
1959Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: A. Francke.Google Scholar
Ringe, Donald A., Jr.
1995 “ ‘Nostratic’ and the Factor of Chance”. Diachronica 121. 55–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Alan S. C.
1950 “Philological Probability Problems”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological) 121.12–59.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1915 “The Na-Dene Languages: A preliminary report”. American Anthropologist n.s. 171.534–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by 6 other publications

Harvey, Mark & Robert Mailhammer
2017. Reconstructing remote relationships. Diachronica 34:4  pp. 470 ff. DOI logo
Galucio, Ana Vilacy, Sérgio Meira, Joshua Birchall, Denny Moore, Nilson Gabas Júnior, Sebastian Drude, Luciana Storto, Gessiane Picanço & Carmen Reis Rodrigues
2015. Genealogical relations and lexical distances within the Tupian linguistic family. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas 10:2  pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Kilani, Marwan
2015. Calculating false cognates. Diachronica 32:3  pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Croft, William
2008. Evolutionary Linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology 37:1  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Hitchcock, Christopher
1998. The Common Cause Principle in Historical Linguistics. Philosophy of Science 65:3  pp. 425 ff. DOI logo
Michalove, Peter A., Stefan Georg & Alexis Manaster Ramer
1998. CURRENT ISSUES IN LINGUISTIC TAXONOMY. Annual Review of Anthropology 27:1  pp. 451 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.