Article published In:
Demystifying New Methods in Historical Linguistics
Edited by Erich Round
[Diachronica 41:3] 2024
► pp. 330354
References (39)
References
Agee, Joshua. 2018. A glottometric subgrouping of the early Germanic languages. San Jose, CA: San Jose State University MA thesis. DOI logo
Bhavnani, Ravi, Karsten Donnay, Dan Miodownik, Maayan Mor & Dirk Helbing. 2014. Group segregation and urban violence. American Journal of Political Science 58(1). 226–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouckaert, Remco R., Claire Bowern & Quentin Atkinson. 2018. The origin and expansion of Pama-Nyungan languages across Australia. Nature Ecology & Evolution 2(4). 741–749. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowern, Claire. 1998. The case of Proto-Karnic. Canberra: Australian National University Honour’s thesis. DOI logo
Chang, Will, Chundra Cathcart, David Hall & Andrew Garrett. 2015. Ancestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the Indo-European steppe hypothesis. Language 91(1). 194–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2008. Evolutionary linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology 371. 219–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Currie, Thomas E., Andrew Meade, Myrtille Guillon & Ruth Mace. 2013. Cultural phylo-geography of the Bantu languages of sub-Saharan Africa. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280(1762).Google Scholar
François, Alexandre. 2015. Trees, waves and linkages: Models of language diversification. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics), 161–189. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gavin, Michael, Carlos Botero, Claire Bowern, Robert Colwell, Michael Dunn, Robert Dunn, Russell Gray, inter alia & Yanega Gregor. 2013. Toward a mechanistic understanding of linguistic diversity. BioScience 63(7). 524–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavin, Michael, Thiago Rangel, Claire Bowern, Robert Colwell, Kathryn Kirby, Carlos Botero, Michael Dunn, inter alia & Russell Gray. 2017. Process-based modelling shows how climate and demography shape language diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 26(5). 584–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Russell & Quentin Atkinson. 2003. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426(6965). 435–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenhill, Simon & Russell Gray. 2012. Basic vocabulary and Bayesian phylolinguistics: Issues of understanding and representation. Diachronica 29(4). 523–537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenhill, Simon, Hannah Haynie, Robert Ross, Angela Chira, Johann-Mattis List, Lyle Campbell, Carlos Botero & Russell Gray. 2023. A recent northern origin for the Uto-Aztecan family. Language preprint. 81–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harding, Rosalind M. & Robert R. Sokal. 1988. Classification of the European language families by genetic distance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 85(23). 9370–9372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Michele Gubian, Mary Stevens & Florian Schiel. 2019. Phonetic change in an Antarctic winter. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 146(5). 3327–3332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Frederik. 2023. Germanic phylogeny. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Frederik & Gerhard Jäger. 2023. Gaussian process models for geographic controls in phylogenetic trees. Open Research Europe 3(57). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heggarty, Paul, Warren Maguire & April McMahon. 2010. Splits or waves? Trees or webs? How divergence measures and network analysis can unravel language histories. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365(1559). 3829–3843. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holden, Clare & Russell Gray. 2006. Rapid radiation, borrowing and dialect continua in the Bantu languages. In Peter Forster & Colin Renfrew (eds.), Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages, 19–31. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Johann-Mattis List. 2019. Save the trees: Why we need tree models in linguistic reconstruction (and when we should apply them). Journal of Historical Linguistics 9(1). 128–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Gerhard. 2018. Global-scale phylogenetic linguistic inference from lexical resources. Scientific Data 5(1). 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Gerhard & Johannes Wahle. 2021. Phylogenetic typology. Frontiers in Psychology 121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalyan, Siva & Alexandre François. 2018. Freeing the comparative method from the tree model: A framework for historical glottometry. In Ritsuko Kikusawa & Lawrence A. Reid (eds.), Let’s talk about trees: Genetic relationships of languages and their phylogenetic representation (Senri Ethnological Studies 98), 59–89. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
. 2019. When the waves meet the trees: A response to Jacques and List. Journal of Historical Linguistics 9(1). 168–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koile, Ezequiel, Simon Greenhill, Damián Blasi, Remco Bouckaert & Russell Gray. 2022. Phylogeographic analysis of the Bantu language expansion supports a rainforest route. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119(32). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2). 344–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McElreath, Richard. 2020. Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McMahon, April & Robert McMahon. 2005. Language classification by numbers. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakhleh, Luay, Don Ringe & Tandy Warnow. 2005. Perfect phylogenetic networks: A new methodology for reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages. Language 81(2). 382–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna & Tandy Warnow. 2008. Tutorial on computational linguistic phylogeny. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(5). 760–820. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pacheco Coelho, Marco Túlio, Elisa Barreto Pereira, Hannah Haynie, Thiago Rangel, Patrick Kavanagh, Kathryn Kirby, Simon Greenhill, inter alia & Michael Gavin. 2019. Drivers of geographical patterns of North American language diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 286(1899). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ranacher, Peter, Nico Neureiter, Rik van Gijn, Barbara Sonnenhauser, Anastasia Escher, Robert Weibel, Pieter Muysken & Balthasar Bickel. 2021. Contact-tracing in cultural evolution: A Bayesian mixture model to detect geographic areas of language contact. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 18(181). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Don, Tandy Warnow & Ann Taylor. 2002. Indo-European and computational cladistics. Transactions of the Philological Society 100(1). 59–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Johannes. 1871. Zur Geschichte des indogermanischen Vocalismus. Weimar: H. Bohlau.Google Scholar
Sevenants, Anthe & Dirk Speelman. 2021. Keeping up with the neighbours – An agent-based simulation of the divergence of the standard Dutch pronunciations in the Netherlands and Belgium. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal 111. 5–26.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Takuya & Yasuo Ihara. 2023. Spatial evolution of human cultures inferred through Bayesian phylogenetic analysis. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 20(198). 20220543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1974. Linguistic change and diffusion: Description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Language in Society 3(2). 215–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weidmann, Nils B. & Idean Salehyan. 2013. Violence and ethnic segregation: A computational model applied to Baghdad. International Studies Quarterly 57(1). 52–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yanovich, Igor. 2020. Phylogenetic linguistic evidence and the Dene-Yeniseian homeland. Diachronica 37(3). 410–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar