Book review
Charlotte Galves, Sonia Cyrino, Ruth Lopes, Filomena Sandalo & Juanito Avelar. Parameter theory and linguistic change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. 416 pp.
References (28)
References
Battye, Adrian & Roberts Ian. 1995. Introduction. In Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts (eds.), Clause structure and language change, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Biberauer, Theresa, Glenda Newton & Michelle Sheehan. 2009. Limiting synchronic and diachronic variation: The Final-over-Final Constraint. Language and Linguistics 101. 699–741.
Boeckx, Cedric. 2010. What Principles & Parameters got wrong. Ms., Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats/Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Boeckx, Cedric. 2011. Approaching parameters from below. In Ana Maria Di Sciullo & Cedric Boeckx (eds.), The biolinguistic enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty, 205–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric syntax. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris. 

Briscoe, Edward J. 2000. Evolutionary perspectives on diachronic syntax. In Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms, 75–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 361. 1–22. 

Clark, Robin & Roberts Ian. 1993. A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry 241. 299–345.
Gelderen, Elly van. 2009. Feature Economy in the linguistic cycle. In Paola Crisma & Giuseppe Longobardi (eds.), Historical syntax and linguistic theory, 93–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Gold, E. Mark. 1967. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control 101. 447–474. 

Johnson, Kent. 2004. Gold’s Theorem and cognitive science. Philosophy of Science 711. 571–592. 

Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lightfoot, David W. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lightfoot, David W. 1991. How to set parameters. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lightfoot, David W. 1995. Why UG needs a learning theory: Triggering verb movement. In Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts (eds.), Clause structure and language change, 31–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lightfoot, David W. 1999. The development of language: Acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
Longobardi, Giuseppe & Guardiano Cristina. 2009. Evidence for syntax as a sign of historical relatedness. Lingua 1191. 1679–1706. 

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2005. Possible and probable languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Niyogi, Partha & Berwick Robert. 1995. The logical problem of language change (MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Memo No. 1516, 19 pp.). Cambridge, MA. 

Roberts, Ian. 2007. Diachronic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, Ian & Roussou Anna. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Uriagereka, Juan. 2006. Towards a syntax of Proto-Basque. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca Julio de Urquijo: International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology 401. 949–968.
Yang, Charles. 2000. Internal and external forces in language change. Language Variation & Change 121. 231–250. 

Yang, Charles. 2002. Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.