Article published In:
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 8:2 (2019) ► pp.163171
References
Bohnemeyer, J., Eisenbeiss, S., Narasimhan, B.
(2006) Ways to go: Methodological considerations in Whorfian studies in motion events. Colchester: Dept. of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L.
(2001) Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C.
(Eds.) (1996) Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lucy, J. A.
(1992) Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montero-Melis, G., Eisenbeiss, S., Narasimhan, B., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kita, S., Kopecka, A., Lüpke, F., Nikitina, T., Tragel, I., Jaeger, T. F., & Bohnemeyer, J.
(2017) Satellite- vs. verb-framing underpredicts nonverbal motion categorization: Insights from a large language sample and simulations. Cognitive Semantics, 3(1), 36–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naigles, L., Eisenberg, A., Kako, E., Highter, M., & McGraw, N.
(1998) Speaking of motion: Verb use in English and Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(5), 521–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L.
(2002) Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: The representation of motion in thought and language. Cognition, 84(2), 189–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E.
(1921) Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Skordos, D., & Papafragou, A.
(2014) Lexical, syntactic, and semantic-geometric factors in the acquisition of motion predicates. Developmental Psychology, 50(7), 1985–1998. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
(1987) Thinking for speaking. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 435–445). Berkeley University of California.Google Scholar
(1996) Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani, & S. A. Thomspon (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195–219). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(2006) What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 59–81). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
(1991) Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 480–519). Berkeley University of California.Google Scholar
Trueswell, J., & Papafragou, A.
(2010) Perceiving and remembering events cross-linguistically: Evidence from dual-task paradigms. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(1), 64–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verkerk, A.
(2014) The evolutionary dynamics of motion event encoding. Enschede: Ipskamp Drukkers. [URL]
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Zaychenko, Katharina
2022. Grammatical and cognitive factors shaping the conceptualization of motion events. Languages in Contrast 22:1  pp. 136 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.