Article published In:
Dutch Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 4:2 (2015) ► pp.241–256
The EPPM put to the test
Evaluating four basic propositions
Fear appeals are frequently used in health communication, for example in anti-smoking campaigns. Of the different theoretical models that predict and explain how fear appeals work, the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM; Witte, 1992) is probably used most often. However, most propositions of the EPPM were not explicitly tested, or received mixed empirical support (Popova, 2012). To clarify the relationships between the variables of the EPPM, four of the EPPM’s propositions were tested by performing correlational and mediation analyses. The results (n = 116) show that a large part of the relationships between the concepts of the EPPM and the outcomes of fear appeals differ from what the EPPM claims: threat and intention did not prove to be related, threat did not mediate the effect of fear on intention, and fear did not prove to influence the fear control responses. The findings from this study raise questions regarding the appropriateness of the EPPM.
References
Dillard, J.P., Plotnick, C.A., Godbold, L.C., Freimuth, V.S., & Edgar, T
(1996) The multiple affective outcomes of AIDS PSAs: Fear appeals do more than scare people. Communication Research, 23(1), 44–72. 
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I
(2010) Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press.
Goodall, C.E., & Roberto, A.J
(2008) An inconvenient truth: An application of the extended parallel process model. Communication Teacher, 22(3), 93–96.
Green, M.C., & Brock, T.C
(2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721.
Hayes, A.F
(2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420.
(2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
Hoog, N. de, Stroebe, W., & Wit, J.B.F. de
(2008) The processing of fear‐arousing communications: How biased processing leads to persuasion. Social Influence, 3(2), 84–113.
McMahan, S., Witte, K., & Meyer, J
(1998) The perception of risk messages regarding electromagnetic fields: Extending the extended parallel process model to an unknown risk. Health Communication, 10(3), 247–259.
Morman, M
(2000) The influence of fear appeals, message design, and masculinity on men’s motivation to perform the testicular self-exam. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28(2), 91–116.
Moyer-Gusé, E
(2008) Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 181, 407–425.
Popova, L
(2012) The extended parallel process model: Illuminating the gaps in research. Health Education & Behavior, 39(4), 455–473.
(2014) Scaring the snus out of smokers: Testing effects of fear, threat, and efficacy on smokers’ acceptance of novel smokeless tobacco products. Health Communication, 29(9), 924–936.
Rachman, S
(2004) Anxiety. New York: Psychology Press.
Rintamaki, L.S., & Yang, Z.J
(2013) Advancing the extended parallel process model through the inclusion of response costs measures. Journal of Health Communication, 191, 759–774.
Ruiter, R.A.C., Kessels, L.T.E., Peters, G.Y., & Kok, G
(2014) Sixty years of fear appeal research: Current state of the evidence. International Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 63–70.
Ruiter, R.A.C., Verplanken, B., Cremer, D. de, & Kok, G
(2004) Danger and fear control in response to fear appeals: The role of need for cognition. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26(1), 13–24.
So, J
(2013) A further extension of the extended parallel process model (E-EPPM): Implications of cognitive appraisal theory of emotion and dispositional coping style. Health Communication, 281, 72–83.
Spielberger, C.D
(1983) Anxiety inventory for adults (Forms Y1 and Y2). Menlo Park: Mind Garden.
Taylor, J.A
(1953) A personality scale of manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48(2), 285–290.
Witte, K
(1992) Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 591, 329–349.
(1998) Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: Using the extended parallel process model to explain fear appeal successes and failures. In P.A. Anderson & L.K. Guerrero (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 423–450). London: Academic Press.
Witte, K., Cameron, K.A., McKeon, J.K., & Berkowitz, J.M
(1996) Predicting risk behaviors: Development and validation of a diagnostic scale. Journal of Health Communication, 1(4), 317–341.
Witte, K., & Morrison, K
(2000) Examining the influence of trait anxiety/repression‐sensitization on individuals’ reactions to fear appeals. Western Journal of Communication, 64(1), 1–27.