Article published In:
The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause
Edited by Ben Clarke and Jorge Arús-Hita
[English Text Construction 9:1] 2016
► pp. 99114
Barthes, Roland
1966Introduction à l’analyse structurale des récits. Communications 81: 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Chatman, Seymour
1969New ways of analysing narrative structure. Language and Style 21: 3–36.Google Scholar
1978Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Ben P
2012Do patterns of ellipsis in text support systemic functional linguistics’ ‘context-metafunction hook-up’ hypothesis? A corpus-based approach. Ph.D. dissertation, Cardiff University.
2016Cohesion in Systemic Functional Linguistics in the 21st century: A theoretical reflection. In The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds). Oxford: Routledge, n.a.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Further semantics of ellipsis: The increased textual pace construed by consecutive Subject ellipsis. Submitted to Word.
Cloran, Carmel
1994Rhetorical Units and Decontextualisation: An Enquiry into some Relations of Context, Meaning and Grammar. Nottingham: Monographs in Systemic Linguistics.Google Scholar
Daneš, František
1974Functional sentence perspective and the organisation of the text. In Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, František Daneš (ed.). The Hague: Mouton, 106–128.Google Scholar
Fawcett, Robin P
2000A Theory of Syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics through the Cardiff Grammar: An Extension and Simplification of Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar, 3rd edition. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan
1971On the concept of communicative dynamism in the theory of functional sentence perspective. Sbornik prací filosofické fakulti brnenské university 19 (71): 135–144.Google Scholar
1992Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, John R
1951Modes of meaning. Essays and Studies of the English Association 41: 123–149.Google Scholar
Genette, Gerard
1980Narrative Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1985Iconicity, isomorphism and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In Iconicity in Syntax, John Haiman (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 187–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Michael J
2002Phasal analysis within communication linguistics: Two contrastive discourses. In Relations and Functions within and around Language, Peter Fries, Michael Cummings, David Lockwood & William Spruiell (eds). London: Continuum, 316–345.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
1961Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 171: 241–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1967aNotes on transitivity and theme in English, part 1. Journal of Linguistics 3 (1): 37–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1967bNotes on transitivity and theme in English, part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3 (2): 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1968Notes on transitivity and theme in English, part 3. Journal of Linguistics 4 (2): 179–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1979Modes of meaning and modes of expression: Types of grammatical structure, and their determination by different semantic functions. In Function and Context in Linguistic Analysis: Essays Offered to William Haas, David J. Allerton, Edward Carney & David Holdcroft (eds). London: Cambridge University Press, 57–79.Google Scholar
1985Systemic background. In Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, James D. Benson & William S. Greaves (eds). Norwood: Ablex, 1–15.Google Scholar
1993Systemic theory. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Ron E. Asher (ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press, 4505–4508.Google Scholar
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K
1996On grammar and grammatics. In Functional Descriptions: Theory in Practice, Ruqaiya Hasan, Carmel Cloran & David G. Butt (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1985Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M
2002Lexicogrammar in discourse development: Logogenetic patterns of wording. In Discourse and Language Functions, Guo Huang & Zong Wang (eds). Shanghai: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2–25.Google Scholar
Miller, George A
1956The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 631: 81–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noordman, Leo & Wietske Vonk
1994Text processing and its relevance for literacy. In Functional Literacy: Theoretical Issues and Educational Implications, Ludo Verhoeven (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 75–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakes, Michael
1998Statistics for Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Simpson, Paul
2014Just what is narrative urgency? Language and Literature 23 (1): 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John
1991Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Xueyan, Yang
2013Modelling ellipsis in EFL classroom discourse. In Developing Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and Application, Fang Yan & Jonathan J. Webster (eds). Sheffield: Equinox, 227–240.Google Scholar