Article published In:
English World-Wide
Vol. 35:3 (2014) ► pp.277305
References
Bernaisch, Tobias, Stefan Th. Gries, and Joybrato Mukherjee
Biewer, Carolin
2011“Modal Auxiliaries in Second Language Varieties: A Learner’s Perspective”. In Joybrato Mukherjee and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 7–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina, and R. Harald Baayen
2007“Predicting the Dative Alternation”. In Gerlof Bouma, Irene Krämer, and Joost Zwarts, eds. Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, 69–94.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Jennifer Hay
2008“Gradient Grammar: An Effect of Animacy on the Syntax of Give in New Zeland and American English”. Lingua 1181: 245–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter
1995“The Indirect Object Construction in English: An Informational Approach”. Linguistics 331: 35–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutler, Richard
2010Tree-based Methods for Classification and Regression. NESCent Workshop on Tree-based methods for Classification and regression. [URL] (accessed June 13, 2013)
Deshors, Sandra C., and Stefan Th. Gries
2014 “A Case for the Multifactorial Assessment of Learner Language: The Uses of ‘May’ and ‘Can’ in French-English Interlanguage”. In Dylan Glynn and Justyna Robinson eds. Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy Amsterdam John Benjamins 179 204
Divjak, Dagmar S., and Stefan Th. Gries
2006“Ways of Trying in Russian: Clustering Behavioral Profiles”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 21: 23–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009“Corpus-Based Cognitive Semantics: A Contrastive Study of Phasal Verbs in English and Russian”. In Katarzyna Dziwirek and Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, eds. Studies in Cognitive Corpus Linguistics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 273–296.Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2011“Corpus Linguistics to Bridge the Gap between World Englishes and Learner Englishes”. In L. Ruiz Miyares and M.R. Álvarez Silva, eds. Comunicación social en el siglo XXI, Vol. II1. Santiago de Cuba: Centro de Lingüística Aplicada, 638–642.Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, and Sylviane Granger
2011“From EFL to ESL: Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English” . In Joybrato Mukherjee and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes: Bridging the paradigm gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 55–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Götz, Sandra and Marco Schilk
2011“Formulaic Sequences in Spoken ENL, ESL and EFL: Focus on British English, Indian English and Learner English”. In Joybrato Mukherjee and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 79–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane, Estelle Dagneaux, Fanny Meunier, and Magali Paquot
2009International Corpus of Learner English. Handbook and CD-ROM. Version 2. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Green, Georgia M
1974Semantic and Syntactic Irregularity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney
ed. 1996Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th
2003aMultifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2003b“Towards a Corpus-Based Identification of Prototypical Instances of Constructions”. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11: 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009BehavioralProfiles 1.01. A program for R 2.7.1 and higher.
Gries, Stefan Th, and Allison S. Adelman
2014. “Subject Realization in Japanese Conversation by Native and Non-Native Speakers: Exemplifying a New Paradigm for Learner Corpus Research”. Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014: New Empirical and Methodological Paradigms. Cham: Springer, 35–54.
Gries, Stefan Th, and Sandra C. Deshors
2014. “Using Regressions to Explore Deviations between Corpus Data and a Standard/Target: Two Suggestions”. Corpora 91: 109–136. DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th, and Anatol Stefanowitsch
2004“Extending Collostructional Analysis: A Corpus-Based Perspective on ‘Alternations’”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 91: 97–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th, and Stefanie Wulff
2013Differences in Prenominal Adjective Order by Native Speakers and Learners: A Two-Step Regression-Analytic Procedure. Paper presented at the 2013 conference of the American Association for Corpus Linguistics, California State University, San Diego, January 18, 2013.
2013. “The Genitive Alternation in Chinese and German ESL Learners: Towards a Multifactorial Notion of Context in Learner Corpus Research”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics.
Groves, Julie
2010“Error or Feature? The Issue of Interlanguage Deviations in Non-Native Varieties of English”. Hong Kong Baptist University Papers in Applied Language Studies 141: 108–129.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, and Joybrato Mukherjee
2011a“Discussion Forum: New Englishes and Learner Englishes – Quo Vadis?”. In Joybrato Mukherjee and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 209–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b“Introduction: Bridging a Paradigm Gap”. In Joybrato Mukherjee and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Braj B
ed 1982The Other Tongue: English across Cultures. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
1991“Liberation linguistics and the Quirk concern”. English Today 251: 3–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laporte, Samantha
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Sebastian Hoffman
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Marianne Hundt
Nam, Christopher, Sach Mukherjee, Marco Schilk, and Joybrato Mukherjee
2013“Statistical analysis of varieties of English”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1761: 777–793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team
2010R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. [URL] (accessed January 1, 2010)Google Scholar
Ransom, Elizabeth
1979“Definiteness and Animacy Constraints on Passives and Double Object Constructions in English”. Glossa 131: 215–240.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter
1996“Cognitive Complexity and Increased Grammatical Explicitness in English”. Cognitive Linguistics 71: 149–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schilk, Marco, Joybrato Mukherjee, Christopher Nam, and Sach Mukherjee
2013 “Complementation of Ditransitive Verbs in South Asian Englishes: A Multifactorial Analysis”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 01: 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W
2003“The Dynamics of New Englishes: From Identity Construction to Dialect Birth”. Language 791: 233–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sridhar, Kamal K., and S.N. Sridhar
1986“Bridging the Paradigm Gap: Second language Acquistion Theory and Indigenized Varieties of English”. World Englishes 51: 3–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Ryota, and Hidetoshi Shimodaira
2011Hierarchical Clustering with P-Values via Multiscale Bootstrap Resampling. [URL] (accessed October 4, 2013).Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, and Bernd Kortmann
2009“The Morphosyntax of Varieties of English Worldwide: A Quantitative Perspective”. Lingua 1191: 1643–1663. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011“Typological Profiling: Learner Englishes versus L2 Varieties of English”. In Joybrato Mukherjee and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap . Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 167–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Rooy, B
2011“A Principled Distinction between Error and Conventionalized Innovation in African Englishes”. In Joybrato Mukherjee and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap.Amsterdam:John Benjamins, 189–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Jean Carletta, Gregory Gerretson, Joan Bresnan, Andrew Koontz-Garboden, Tatiana Nikitina, M. Catherine O’Connor, and Tom Wasow
2004 “Animacy encoding in English: why and how”. Proceedings of the 2004 ACL Workshop on Discourse Annotation . Barcelona: 118–125.
Cited by

Cited by 24 other publications

Brunner, Marie-Louise, Stefan Diemer & Selina Schmidt
2016. “It’s always different when you look something from the inside”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2  pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C.
Deshors, Sandra C.
2018. Modeling World Englishes in the 21st century. In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Gaëtanelle Gilquin
2018. Modeling World Englishes in the 21st century. In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61],  pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Stefan Th. Gries
2016. Profiling verb complementation constructions across New Englishes. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:2  pp. 192 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C., Sandra Götz & Samantha Laporte
2016. Linguistic innovations in EFL and ESL. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Dubois, Tanguy, Magali Paquot & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2023. Alternation phenomena and language proficiency: the genitive alternation in the spoken language of EFL learners. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 19:3  pp. 427 ff. DOI logo
Edwards, Alison & Rutger-Jan Lange
2016. In case ofinnovation. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2  pp. 252 ff. DOI logo
Flowerdew, John
2022. Models of English for research publication purposes. World Englishes 41:4  pp. 571 ff. DOI logo
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
Gries, Stefan Th., Santa Barbara, Justus Liebig & Sandra C. Deshors
2020. There’s more to alternations than the main diagonal of a 2×2 confusion matrix: Improvements of MuPDAR and other classificatory alternation studies. ICAME Journal 44:1  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th. & Sandra C. Deshors
2015. EFL and/vs. ESL?. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1:1  pp. 130 ff. DOI logo
Hall, Christopher J., Jack Joyce & Chris Robson
2017. Investigating the lexico-grammatical resources of a non-native user of English: The case of can and could in email requests . Applied Linguistics Review 8:1  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Horch, Stephanie
2016. Innovative conversions in South-East Asian Englishes. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2  pp. 278 ff. DOI logo
Koch, Christopher, Claudia Lange & Sven Leuckert
2016. “This hair-style called as ‘duck tail’”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Kruger, Haidee & Bertus van Rooy
2018. Register variation in written contact varieties of English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 39:2  pp. 214 ff. DOI logo
KRUGER, HAIDEE & BERTUS VAN ROOY
2017. Editorial practice and the progressive in Black South African English. World Englishes 36:1  pp. 20 ff. DOI logo
MERILÄINEN, LEA
2017. The progressive form in learner Englishes: Examining variation across corpora. World Englishes 36:4  pp. 760 ff. DOI logo
Meriläinen, Lea
2018. The progressive form and its functions in spoken learner English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2  pp. 164 ff. DOI logo
Meriläinen, Lea
2020. The progressive form and its functions in spoken learner English. In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108],  pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
ONYSKO, ALEXANDER
2016. Modeling world Englishes from the perspective of language contact. World Englishes 35:2  pp. 196 ff. DOI logo
Rautionaho, Paula, Sandra C. Deshors & Lea Meriläinen
2018. Revisiting the ENL-ESL-EFL continuum: A multifactorial approach to grammatical aspect in spoken Englishes. ICAME Journal 42:1  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Rosen, Anna
2016. The fate of linguistic innovations. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2  pp. 302 ff. DOI logo
Yao, Xinyue
2016. Cleft constructions in Hong Kong English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 37:2  pp. 197 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.