Article published In:
English World-WideVol. 36:2 (2015) ► pp.198–227
The rise of the going to future in Tyneside English
Evidence for further grammaticalisation
This paper investigates the relative frequencies of the two major syntactic markers of future time expression (FTE), be going to and will in the Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English (DECTE). In particular, the rise in the frequency of be going to will be examined in the light of current theories of grammaticalisation. The various grammatical constraints that have been identified in the literature as determining the distribution of will versus be going to will be investigated. It will be shown that a number of interesting changes have occurred within the fifty-year period covered by the data-set. In specific areas of grammar, contrasts have been maintained (e.g. first person versus the other persons in the favouring of will), strengthened (e.g. subordinate clauses versus main clauses in the favouring of going to), weakened (e.g. the dominance of will in contexts of distal future reference) or even introduced (e.g. the apodoses of if-clauses emerging as a syntactic niche for the favouring of will).
Keywords: diachronic, English, Tyneside, variation, future, grammaticalisation, frequency
References (43)
The Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English (DECTE). <[URL]>
Allen, Will, Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan, Warren Maguire, and Hermann L. Moisl. 2007. “The Newcastle Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English
”. In Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan, and Herman L. Moisl, eds. Creating and Digitising Language Corpora. Vol. 2: Diachronic Databases. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 16–48. 
Beal, Joan C. 1993. “The Grammar of Tyneside and Northumbrian English”. In James Milroy and Lesley Milroy, eds. Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. London: Longman, 187–213.
Beal, Joan C., and Karen P. Corrigan. 2005. “
No, Nay, Never: Negation in Tyneside English”. In Yoko Iyeiri, ed. Aspects of English Negation. Tokyo: Yushodo University Press, and Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 139–156.
Berglund, Ylva. 1997. “Future in Present-Day English: Corpus-Based Evidence on the Rivalry of Expressions”. ICAME Journal 211: 7–19.
. 2000. “Utilising Present-Day English Corpora: A Case Study Concerning Expressions of Future Time”. ICAME Journal 241: 25–63.
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1991. “Back to the Future”. In Elizabeth C. Traugott, and Bernd Heine, eds. Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17–58.
. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Corrigan, Karen P., Isabelle Buchstaller, Adam J. Mearns, and Hermann L. Moisl. 2012. The Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English. <[URL]> (accessed July 30, 2013).
Corrigan, Karen P., Adam Mearns, and Hermann L. Moisl. 2014. “Feature-Based Versus Aggregate Analyses of the DECTE Corpus: Phonological and Morphological Variability in Tyneside English”. In Benedikt Szmrecsanyi and Bernhard Wälchli, eds. Aggregating Dialectology, Typology and Feature Analysis: Linguistic Variation in Text and Speech. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 113–149.
Danchev, Andrei, and Merja Kytö. 1994. “The Construction Be Going to + Infinitive in Early Modern English”. In Dieter Kastovsky, ed. Studies in Early Modern English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 59–77.
Denison, David. 1998. “Syntax”. In Suzanne Romaine, ed. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. 41: 1776–1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 92–329.
Dollinger, Stefan. 2008. New-Dialect Formation in Canada: Evidence from the English Modal Auxiliaries. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fischer, Olga. 1992. “Syntax”. In Norman Blake, ed. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. 21: 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 207–408.
Gotti, Maurizio. 2003. “
Shall and Will in Contemporary English: A Comparison with Past Uses”. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug, and Frank Palmer, eds. Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 267–300.
Harris, John. 1993. “The Grammar of Irish English”. In James Milroy, and Lesley Milroy, eds. Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. London: Longman, 139–186.
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. “On Some Principles of Grammaticization”. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott, ed. Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17–36.
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, Dan E. 2009. “Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed Effects Variable Rule Analysis”. Language and Linguistics Compass 31: 359–383.
Krug, Manfred. 2000. Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Leech, Geoffrey. 2003. “Modality on the Move: The English Modal Auxiliaries 1961–1992”. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug, and Frank Palmer, eds. Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 223–240.
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mair, Christian. 1997. “The Spread of the Going to Future in Written English: A Corpus-Based Investigation into Language Change in Progress”. In Raymond Hickey, and Stanislaw Puppel, eds. Language History and Linguistic Modelling. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1537–1543.
. 2006. Twentieth-Century English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mair, Christian, and Geoffrey Leech. 2006. “Current Changes in English Syntax”. In Bas Aarts, and April McMahon, eds. The Handbook of English Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 318–342.
McDonald, Christine. 1981. “Variation in the Use of the Modal Verbs with Special Reference to Tyneside English”. Ph.D. dissertation, Newcastle University.
Miller, Jim. 1993. “The Grammar of Scottish English”. In James Milroy, and Lesley Milroy, eds. Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. London: Longman, 99–138.
Myhill, John. 1995. “Change and Continuity in the Functions of the American English Modals”. Linguistics 331: 175–211.
Nesselhauf, Nadja. 2010. “The Development of Future Time Expressions in Late Modern English: Redistribution of Forms or Change in Discourse?” English Language and Linguistics 141: 163–186.
. 2012. “Mechanisms of Language Change in a Functional System: The Recent Semantic Evolution of English Future Time Expressions”. Journal of Historical Linguistics 21: 83–132.
. 2014. “From Contraction to Construction? The Recent Life of ’ll
”. In Marianne Hundt, ed. Late Modern English Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 77–89.
Nicolle, Steve. 1997. “A Relevance-Theoretic Account of Be Going to
”. Journal of Linguistics 331: 355–377.
Poplack, Shana, and Sali Tagliamonte. 2000. “The Grammaticalization of Going to in (African American) English”. Language Variation and Change 111: 315–342.
Royster, Jane F., and John M. Steadman. 1923 [1968]. “The Going-to Future”. In Manly Anniversary Studies in Languages and Literature. Freeport: Books for Libraries Press, 394–403.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Sankoff, David. 1988. “Problems of Representativeness”. In Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, and Klaus J. Mattheier, eds. An International Handbook of Language and Society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 899–903.
Sankoff, David, Sali A. Tagliamonte, and Jennifer Smith. 2005. “GoldVarb X”. Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. <[URL]>.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2003. “Be Going to Versus Will/Shall. Does Syntax Matter?” Journal of English Linguistics 311: 295–323.
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2012. Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
. 2013. Roots of English. Exploring the History of Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Torres-Cacoullos, Rena, and James A. Walker. 2009. “The Present of the English Future: Grammatical Variation and Collocations in Discourse”. Language 851: 321–354.
Trousdale, Graeme. 2003. “Modal Verbs in Tyneside English: Evidence for (Socio)Linguistic Theory”. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug, and Frank Palmer, eds. Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 373–388.
Warner, Anthony. 1993. English Auxiliaries: Structure and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Bartels, Birgit & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2024. Future temporal reference in spoken world Englishes. World Englishes 
Bohmann, Axel
2024. Future‐time reference in world Englishes. World Englishes 43:1 ► pp. 2 ff.
Britain, David
2024. Grammatical Variation in England. In Language in Britain and Ireland, ► pp. 98 ff.
Dubois, Tanguy, Magali Paquot & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
Engel, Alexandra & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2022. Variable grammars are variable across registers: future temporal reference in English. Language Variation and Change 34:3 ► pp. 355 ff.
Meierkord, Christiane & Bebwa Isingoma
2022. Between first language influence, exonormative orientation and migration. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 43:2 ► pp. 220 ff.
Hundt, Marianne & Adina Staicov
2018. Identity in the London Indian diaspora: Towards the quantification of qualitative data. World Englishes 37:2 ► pp. 166 ff.
Corrigan, Karen P.
2017. Corpora for Regional and Social Analysis. In Language and a Sense of Place, ► pp. 107 ff.
[no author supplied]
2024. English. In Language in Britain and Ireland, ► pp. 9 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.