Review published In:
Evidentiality in language and cognition
Edited by Lena Ekberg and Carita Paradis
[Functions of Language 16:1] 2009
► pp. 123134
References (32)
References
Baylyn, John Frederick. (2002). Scrambling to reduce scrambling-Part 1. Glot International 6(4): 83–90.Google Scholar
Beaugrande, Robert de. (1980). Text, discourse and process. Norwood, N.J., Ablex.Google Scholar
Birner, Betty J. and Gregory Ward. (1998). Information status and noncanonical word order in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Christopher S.. (2003). Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 2: From clause to discourse and beyond. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S. and Francisco Gonzalvez Garcia. (2005) Mapping functional-cognitive space (with particular reference to Functional Discourse Grammar). In J. Lachlan Mackenzie and María A. Gómez-González (eds.) Studies in Functional Discourse Grammar. (Linguistic Insights Series, 261.) Bern: Peter Lang. 109–158.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Charles Li (ed.) Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press. 25–55.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.. (1979) The flow of thought and the flow of language. In Talmy Givón (ed.) Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press. 159–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daneš, František. (1989) ‘Functional Sentence Perspective’ and Text Connectedness. In Maria-Elisabeth Conte, Janos S. Petöfi & and Emel Sözer (eds.) Proceedings of the conference on connexity and coherence ( Urbino July 16–21). (Studies in Language Comparison, 161.) Amsterdam: Benjamins. 23–32.
Dik, Simon C.. (1997). The theory of Functional Grammar. Part 11. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Edited by Kees Hengeveld.Google Scholar
Downing, Angela. (1991). An alternative approach to theme: A systemic-functional perspective. Word 42(2): 119–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U.. (1972). Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. (1997). The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. (2006) On the architecture of topic and focus. In Valeria Molnár and Susanne Winkler (eds.) The Architecture of Focus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 33–57.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi & Tora Rapoport (eds.) (2005). The syntax of aspect: Deriving thematic and aspectual interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. (2006) Negative theme zones in political interviews: A contrastive analysis of German and English turn-initial positions. In Cristina Mouron Figueroa Teresa I. Moralejo Garate (eds.) Studies in contrastive linguistics. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela Publications. 305–312.Google Scholar
Gelderen, Veronique van. (2003) Scrambling unscrambled. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Gómez-González, María. A. (1998). A corpus-based analysis of extended multiple themes in present-day English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 3(1): 81–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez-González, María A. (2001). The theme-topic interface: Evidence from English. (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series, 711.) Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonzálvez García, Francisco and Christopher S. Butler. (2006). Mapping functional-cognitive space. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 41: 39–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goutsos, Dionysis. (1997). Modelling discourse topic: Sequential relations and strategies of expository texts. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Gregory, Michelle L. and Laura A. Michaelis. (2001). Topicalization and left-dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 1665–1706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette. (2006) Information structure and distinctions from grammar and use: Some evidence from clefts in English and Norwegian. In Valeria Molnár and Susanne Winkler (eds.) The architecture of focus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 517–548.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Part II1. Journal of Linguistics 31: 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hannay, Mike. (1985). English Existentials in Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1994) The Theme zone. In Ronny Boogaart & Jan Noordegraaf (eds.) Nauwe betrekkingen. Voor Theo Janssen bij zijn vijftigste verjaardag. Munster: Nodus Publikationen. 107–117.Google Scholar
. (2007). Patterns of multiple theme and their role in developing English writing skills. In Christopher S. Butler, Raquel Hidalgo and Julia Lavid (eds.) Functional perspectives on grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 257–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishii, Yasuo. (2001) Presuppositional effects of scrambling reconsidered. COE International Symposium, Kanda University of International Studies.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen. (1977) On the function of left dislocation in English discourse. In Akio Kamio (ed.) Directions in Functional Linguistics. Philadelphia: Benjamins. 117–144.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. (1981). Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27(1): 53–94.Google Scholar
Vallduvi, Enric. (1992). The informational component. Ph.D. dissertation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Weiss, Daniel. 1975. Topic und ein seltsamer Comment. Linguistische Berichte 361: 24–36.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Li, Weijun, Nali Deng, Yufang Yang & Lin Wang
2018. Process focus and accentuation at different positions in dialogues: an ERP study. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 33:2  pp. 255 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.