Review published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 16:2 (2009) ► pp.290297
References (12)
References
Bolinger, Dwight. 1961. Generality, gradience and the all-or-none. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1984. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. 21 vols. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1961. Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17(2). 241–92. Reprinted in Halliday, M. A. K. 2002. On grammar (The collected works of M. A. K. Halliday 11 – ed. by Jonathan Webster), 37–94. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobsson, Bengt. 1977. Adverbs, prepositions and conjunctions in English: a study in gradience. Studia Linguistica 311. 38–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2004. A new Gray’s Anatomy of English grammar: A review of Huddleston and Pullum (2002). English Language and Linguistics 8(1). 121–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph. 1965. Descriptive statement and serial relationship. Language 41(2). 205–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1041. 192–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R. 1973. A fake NP squish. In Charles J. Bailey & Roger W. Shuy (eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English, 96–140. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Zadeh, Lotfi A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 81. 338–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar