Cover not available
Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 27:3 (2020) ► pp.307–339

The role of (historical) pragmatics in the use of response particles

The case of French

| The University of Manchester

This paper studies the synchronic uses and diachronic evolution of a small set of so-called “response particles” in French, viz. the contemporary forms oui ‘yes’, si ‘yes’, and non ‘no’, and their historical sources, as well as a by now largely obsolete fourth particle nenni ‘no’. Among current models of response particle usage, the leading syntactic model is argued to be fundamentally flawed, while the leading semantic model reveals itself incapable of providing an empirically accurate account of the present-day uses of the French particles. Instead, (historical) pragmatics is shown to constitute an indispensable component of such an account. This is hypothesized to be true not just for French, but across languages. In addition, analysis of the French data throws (further) doubt on the explanatory power of the concept of synchronic functional paradigms.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Response particles: A general overview
  • 3.The two basic systems of response particle usage
    • 3.1 Holmberg (2016): The use of response particles is syntactically determined
    • 3.2 Roelofsen & Farkas (2015): The use of response particles is semantically determined
  • 4.The system of response particles in Modern and Contemporary French
  • 5.The diachronic evolution of the French response particles
    • 5.1Etymological sources of the French response particles
    • 5.2Data used
    • 5.3Classification of response particle uses
    • 5.4Findings
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Databases
  • References
Published online: 30 June 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.18024.mos
References

Databases

Corpus CLAPI
[URL]
Frantext
[URL]
Perseus Digital Library
[URL]
Cole, Peter & Jerry L. Morgan
eds. Syntax and semantics vol. 31 New York Academic Press
Cruse, David Alan
1986 Lexical semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fretheim, Thorstein
2017 The pragmatics of yes and no . In Stavros Assimakopoulos (ed.), Pragmatics and its interfaces, 175–200. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gordon, David & George Lakoff
1975 Conversational postulates. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), 83–106.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975 Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58.Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
2008 Particles at the semantics/pragmatics interface: Synchronic and diachronic issues. A study with special reference to the French phasal adverbs. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2011 On the evolution of temporal n-words in Medieval French. Language Sciences 34(1). 76–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 The grammaticalization of negative indefinites: The case of the temporal/aspectual n-words plus and mais in Medieval French. In Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds.), The diachrony of negation, 185–212. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
2018 The expression of clause negation: From Latin to early French. In Anne Carlier & Céline Guillot-Barbance (eds.), Latin tardif, français: Continuïtés et ruptures, 267–295. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002 On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heinz, Sieglinde
1976 Bejahung und Verneinung. Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur 86(4). 289–316.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2016 The syntax of yes and no. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Høybye, Poul
1939  Oui, si et non . Le français moderne 71. 47–51.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
2001  Oui, non, si: Un trio célèbre et méconnu. Marges linguistiques 21. 95–119.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund
2007 Speech act distinctions in grammar. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), 276–324.Google Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre
2011 The role of pragmatics in grammatical change: The case of French preverbal non . Journal of Pragmatics 431. 1987–1996. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
1985 Dire le vrai: L’adverbe si en français médiéval. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Martinet, André
1952 Function, structure, and sound change. Word 81. 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plantin, Christian
1982  Oui et non sont-ils des pro-phrases? Le français moderne 501. 252–265.Google Scholar
Pohl, Jacques
1976 Matériaux pour l’histoire du système oui-non-si . Kwartalnik neofilologiiczny 231. 197–208.Google Scholar
Pope, Emily Norwood
1972 Questions and answers in English. Harvard, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas Bertram Wallace
1939  Non, nen, and ne with finite verbs in French. In Studies in French language and Mediaeval literature: Presented to Professor Mildred K. Pope by pupils, colleagues and friends, 305–313. Manchester: MUP.Google Scholar
Roelofsen, Floris & Donka Farkas
2015 Polarity particle responses as a window on the interpretation of questions and assertions. Language 91(2). 359–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roulet, Eddy, Antoine Auchlin, Jacques Moeschler, Christian Rubattel & Marianne Schelling
1987 L’articulation du discours en français contemporain, 2nd edn. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. & Arnold M. Zwicky
1985 Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Timothy Shopen, (ed.), 155–196.Google Scholar
Shopen, Timothy
(ed.) 1985 Language typology and syntactic description. Volume 1: Clause structure. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Thesleff, Holger
1960 Yes and no in Plautus and Terence. Helsingfors: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Wallage, Phillip & Win van der Wurff
2013 On saying yes in early Anglo-Saxon England. Anglo-Saxon England 421. 183–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilmet, Marc
1976  Oui, si et non en français moderne. Le français moderne 441, 229–251.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.