Part of
The Conversation Frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction
Edited by Esther Pascual and Sergeiy Sandler
[Human Cognitive Processing 55] 2016
► pp. 235253
Barsalou, L.W.
(1983) Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 211–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H., & Gerrig, R.J.
(1990) Quotation as demonstration. Language, 66(4), 784–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Królak, E.
(2005) The hyphen construction as an instance of metonymy. In E. Górska & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy-metaphor collage (pp. 197–204). Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Fictive interaction: Its functions and usage in discourse. PhD Dissertation, University of Warsaw (unpublished).Google Scholar
Oakley, T.V.
(1995) Presence: The conceptual basis of rhetorical effect. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Pascual, E.
(2002) Imaginary trialogues: Conceptual blending and fictive interaction in criminal courts. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
(2006a) Fictive interaction within the sentence: A communicative type of fictivity in grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 245–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006b) Questions in legal monologues: Fictive interaction as argumentative strategy in a murder trial. Text & Talk, 26(3), 383–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascual, E., & Królak, E.
(2015) The ‘listen to characters thinking’ novel: Fictive interaction as narrative strategy in English literary bestsellers and their Spanish and Polish translations. Ms. [URL]
Pascual, E., Królak, E., & Janssen, Th.A.J.M.
(2013) Direct speech compounds: Evoking socio-cultural scenarios through fictive interaction. Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2), 345–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D.
(1986) Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narrative. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Direct and indirect speech (pp. 311–332). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1992) How is conversation like literary discourse? The role of imagery and details in creating involvement. In P. Downing, S.D. Lima, & M. Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (pp. 31–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Pascual, Esther & Emilia Królak
2018. The‘listen to characters thinking’novel. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:2  pp. 399 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.