Part of
Analogy and Contrast in Language: Perspectives from Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by Karolina Krawczak, Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and Marcin Grygiel
[Human Cognitive Processing 73] 2022
► pp. 1546
Austin, J. L.
1962How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boye, K., & Harder, P.
2012A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language, 88, 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W.
1994Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Culicover, P. W., & Jackendoff, R.
2012Same-except: A domain-general cognitive relation and how language expresses it. Language, 88, 305–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W.
2014Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25, 359–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, J. A.
2006From molecule to metaphor: A neural theory of language. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press/Bradford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C.
2004An introduction to Functional Grammar. Third edition. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Harder, P.
2010Meaning in mind and society: A functional contribution to the social turn in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hebb, D. O.
1961The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K., & Michaelis, L. A.
1998On sentence accent in information questions. In J.-P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (387–402). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1984Active zones. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 10, 172–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2, Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2001What WH means. In A. Cienki, B. J. Luka, & M. B. Smith (Eds.), Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structure (137–152). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2002The control cycle: Why grammar is a matter of life and death. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association, 2, 193–220.Google Scholar
2006On the continuous debate about discreteness. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 107–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009aInvestigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009bMetonymic grammar. In K.-U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (45–71). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Elliptic coordination. Cognitive Linguistics, 23, 555–599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Modals: Striving for control. In J. I. Marín-Arrese, M. Carretero, J. Arús Hita, & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality (3–55). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015On grammatical categories. Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 44–79.Google Scholar
2016aBaseline and elaboration. Cognitive Linguistics, 27, 405–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016bNominal structure in Cognitive Grammar: The Lublin lectures. Lublin: Marie Curie-Skłodowska University Press.Google Scholar
2016cMetaphor in linguistic thought and theory. Cognitive Semantics, 2, 3–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021Functions and assemblies. In K. Kodama & T. Koyama (Eds.), The forefront of Cognitive Linguistics, 1–54. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Schmid, H.-J.
(Ed.) 2017Entrenchment, memory, and automaticity. The psychology of linguistic knowledge and language learning. Washington, DC & Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R.
1969Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. London & New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seuren, P. A. M., & D. Jaspers
2014Logico-cognitive structures in the lexicon. Language, 90, 607–643. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E.
1982Root and epistemic modals: Causality in two worlds. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 8, 484–507.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
1988Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, A.
2005Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar