Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 2:3 (1975) ► pp.283–298

English in Latin Guise

A Note On Some Renaissance Textbooks

 | Åbo Akademi
The balance between Latin and English in 16th and 17th-century school grammars is of particular interest in the light of textbooks such as Joshua Poole’s English Accidence (1646), which could be described as a grammar of Latin entirely in English. The aim of such books was to make the study of Latin grammar easier for beginners. But the classroom procedures they reflect must also have added precision to the pupils’ views of the structural differences between Latin and English, and contributed to the pupils’ understanding of the structure of their mother tongue.
Published online: 1 January 1975
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.2.3.02enk
References (30)
References
Alexander de Villa Dei, see Reichling 1893.Google Scholar
Allen, C. G. 1954. “The Sources of Lily’s Latin Grammar: A review of the facts and some further suggestions”. The Library, 5th series, 91.85–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alston, R(obin) C(arfrae). 1965–73. A Bibliography of the English Language from the Invention of Printing to the Year 1800. Vols. I-X1. New ed. in 11 vol., with corrections and additions. Ilkley, Yorks.: Janus Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Brinsley, John (1566-C.1630). 1612. Ludus Literarius; or, The grammar schoole; … London: T. Man. (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Bullokar, William. 1906 [1586]. “Abbreuiation of his Grammar for english extracted out-of his Grammar at-larg”. Palaestra 521.340–41.Google Scholar
Card well, Edward (1787–1861). 1844. Documentary Annals of the Reformed Church of England. New ed., 21 vols. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. (1st ed., 1839.)Google Scholar
Charlton, Kenneth. 1965. Education in Renaissance England. London: Rout-ledge & Kegan Paul; Toronto; Univ. of Toronto Press. (Repr., 1968.)Google Scholar
Danes, John (d. 1639). 1643. A Light to Lilie; being an easie method for the better teaching and learning of the grounds of the Latine tongue… 2nd ed., newly corrected and enlarged. London: R. Norton. (1st ed., 1637; repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1968.)Google Scholar
Flynn, Vincent Joseph. 1943. “The Grammatical Writings of William Lily, ? 1468-? 1523”. Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 371.85–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gill, Alexander (1565–1635). 1972[1619]. Logonomia Anglica, Part. I1: Facsimiles of Gill’s presentation copy in the Bodleian Library. Ed. with notes and introductions by Bror Danielsson and Arvid Gabrielson; transl, by R. C. Alston. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell. [The printed version of 1621 (London: J. Beale) was repr. in 1968, Menston: Scolar Press.]Google Scholar
Granger, Thomas (b. 1578). 1616. Syntagma grammaticum; or, An easie, and methodologicall explanation of Lillies Grammar,… London: printed by Thomas Dawson. (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1971.)Google Scholar
Hewes, John (fl.1623–32). 1624. A Perfect Survey of the English tongue, taken according to the use and analogie of the Latine. And serueth for the more plaine exposition of the Grammatical Rules and Precepts, collected by Lillie, ….London: W. Garret. (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1972.)Google Scholar
Hume, Alexander (fl. 1550–1620). 1870[1617]. Of the Orthographie and Con-gruitie of the Britain Tongue: A treates, noe shorter then necessarie for the schooles. Ed. by Henry Benjamin Wheatley. London: Oxford Univ. Press. (2nd., 1965.)Google Scholar
Leech, John (1565-C.1650) 1605. Certaine Grammar Questions, for the better furthering of young scholars to understand the accidence, … London: J. Norton.Google Scholar
Lily, William (c.1468–1522), with the collaboration of John Colet (1467? -1519). 1549. A Shorte Introduction of Grammar, generally to be used in the Kynges Maiesties dominions,…. London: no pub. (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1970.)Google Scholar
Meech, Sanford B(rown). 1934. “John Drury and his English Writings”. Speculum 91.70–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1935. “Early Application of Latin Grammar to English”. PMLA 501. 1012–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michael, Ian. 1970. English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Miller, William E. 1968. “Double Translation in the English Humanist Education”. Studies in the Renaissance 101.163–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, William. 1952. “The Teaching of English in Tudor Grammar Schools”. SPh 491.119–43.Google Scholar
Poole, Joshua (fl. 1646–63). 1646. The English Accidence; or, A short, plaine, and easie way, for the more speedy attaining to the Latin tongue, by the help of English. London: H. Seile & R. Lowndes. (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1967.)Google Scholar
Reichling, Dietrich (1845–1921), ed. 1893. Das Doctrinale des Alexander de Villa-Dei: Kritisch-exegetische Ausgabe, …. Berlin: A. Hofmann & Co.Google Scholar
Salmon, Vivian. 1975. “John Brinsley: 17th-century pioneer in applied linguistics”. HL 2:2.175–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scaglione, Aldo. 1972. The Classical Theory of Composition; from its origins to the present: A historical survey. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Shirley, James (1596–1666). 1651. Grammatica Anglo-Latina. An English and latin grammer. The rules composed in English and Latin verse … London: R. Lowndes. (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1969.)Google Scholar
Stockwood, John (d.1610). 1590. A Plaine and Easie Laying Open of the Meaning and understanding of the Rules of Construction in the English Accidence. London: F. Flower.Google Scholar
Thurot, (François) Charles (Eugène, 1823–82). 1868. Notices et extraits de divers manuscrits latins pour servir à l’histoire des doctrines grammaticales au moyen âge. (= Notices et Extraits des Manuscrits de la Bibliothèque impériale 22:2) Paris: Impr. impériale. (Repr., Frankfurt/M.: Minerva, 1964.)Google Scholar
Tuck, J(ohn) P(hilip). 1951. “The Latin Grammar attributed to William Lily”. Durham Research Review, 33–39.Google Scholar
Vorlat, Emma. 1963. Progress in English Grammar, 1585–1735. Diss., Louvain: Catholic Univ. of Louvain. (Printed, 41 vols., Luxembourg: A. Peiffer. 1964.)Google Scholar
Wharton, Jeremiah (c.l605-c. 1655). 1654. The English Grammar; or, The institution of letters, syllables, and words in the English tongue. London: printed by William Du-Gard for the author. (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1970.)Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

WATANABE, TAKUTO
2011. ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE IMMEDIATE FUTURE USE OF BE ABOUT TO IN THE HISTORY OF ENGLISH WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO LATE MODERN ENGLISH. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 28:1 ► pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
Sarkar, Sanjay & Basudam Adhikari
2001. Synthesis and characterization of lignin–HTPB copolyurethane. European Polymer Journal 37:7 ► pp. 1391 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.